Inside Politics Daily

What Lott's Resignation Says About America

Posted:
11/26/07
Filed Under:Senate
It's a sad day in America. Not because Trent Lott is stepping down from the U.S. Senate -- if I offered up grief, it would be in the form of crocodile tears. The bad news isn't that the Minority Whip in the U.S. Senate is leaving, but when and why he is leaving.

Think about it. Put aside the political angling for a second (who will be appointed, who will line up to run, which cushy K Street job has Lott lined up) and let's think about what this man is doing. A single year into his current six year term in the U.S. Senate, he is resigning in order to pursue other opportunities, a euphemism already considered to be a polite way of saying he wants to avoid a law that would place a longer restriction on his ability to lobby Wall Street.
It's been a long time since most of us out here in America felt like we had too many people back in Washington, D.C., for whom we generally felt admiration. This decision by Trent Lott is a reminder of why that feeling is so widespread. Again, forget the ideological disagreements -- and I had plenty with Trent Lott -- who spends so many years angling for power inside Washington just to ultimately send a simple lesson: service and commitment matter, but only until a better paycheck comes along.

Are the voters in Mississippi, the ones who just recently re-upped Trent's contract, upset? I have no idea. Some probably are. Some probably aren't. And those feelings exist for every reason under the sun. But the fact of the matter is Lott's decision means they'll be represented for the next year by someone appointed by their Governor, leaving the citizens the meager choice in 2008 of rubber-stamping someone else's pick or giving up some seniority -- always a concern in cash-strapped states (I'd know, I'm from the equally poor Montana).

Enough rambling for now. I felt the need to write this, though, after a friend asked -- with all these mid-term resignations, when is anyone going to stop looking at the political implications and start asking about the ethical ones? It's a fair point -- and one that I hope goes a few steps further.

Matt Singer

At the ripe age of 24, Matt Singer dabbles in online writing and offline organizing, running a progressive non-profit in his home state of Montana. When not politically engaged, Matt can be found cooking, reading, playing guitar, hiking, and skiing.

Contact Matt Singer

subscribe to: RSS email: Matt Singer

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Avoid hate speech, foul language or a disrespectful tone in your comments. Unwanted comments will be deleted at the discretion of the moderator.

DAILY QUOTE


"What I did to you was wrong. I was completely self-centered and only thinking of myself."
  • Happening Right Now

     

News From Trusted Politics Daily Partners