Mike Gravel was next to answer on 10Questions.com. For those of you unfamiliar with this debate format, you can see my previous coverage here, with a rundown of the questions, my answers, and the candidates' answers to date.
Here are Mike Gravel's answers. After the jump, I'll run through his answers, and let you know how I think he did.
So, why is it you never see any coverage of Mike Gravel's candidacy? He seems like a...
1. Net Neutrality - Oh. That's why. Gravel sees Kucinich's Net Neutrality, and raises him one media conglomerate bust-up. He says only 5 companies control information in this country. I wonder who he means?
2. Is America an Unofficial Theocracy? - Um, no. Actually, I think the questioner was hinting at a de facto theocracy, where only lip service is paid to the non-believer, rather than an explicit enunciation of seperation of church and state. That's why his other question was better.
3. Medical Marijuana - Got bud? He kinda went broad here, urging an end to the "War on Drugs" and equating marijuana use with alcohol, but never specifically addressing medical marijuana. That's cool, nobody ever asks what to do about "medical aloe vera." His position, while sensible and supported by fact, is about 20 years too early for any politician to say out loud.
4. Warrantless Wiretapping - Again, he goes for the broader issue of the government using fear to control us, promising security in exchange for liberty, and delivering neither. So I guess he's against it.
5. Fair Elections - Mike is for public campaign financing, correctly observing the corrupting influence of money on the process, and the explicit nature of the influence of campaign cash. I wish one of these guys had provided a cost analysis of public vs. private financing of elections.
6. Why Won't You Abolish Corporate Personhood? - Again, he will so abolish corporate personhood, but he also rightly calls you out for not giving politicians what they need to walk away from that type of influence.
7. Transparency - Mike seems to advocate legislation through national referenda. I guess we can then set our own transparency level?
8. Is Our Voting System Broken? - Hey! he backed up my point about election fraud being nothing new! And, again with the referenda. I get where he's coming from, but I gotta say, Winston Churchill had a point when he said, "The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
9. Shrink Government - Referenda again.
10. Two Party System - Mike Gravel loves the two-party system, and thinks, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just kidding. Referenda.
I can't fault the guy for believing strongly in the referendum as a tool for democracy, so I'd have to say he gets high marks for completeness. A referendum is a shortcut to progress in Gravel's eyes, but he fails to note that that kind of responsiveness in legislation can cut both ways. What laws do you think the Popular Will would have passed on 9/12/2001?
"He says only 5 companies control information in this country. I wonder who he means?"
Answer:
Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -- now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric's NBC is a close sixth.
Please tell us, Tommy Christopher, you really did already know that.
I like your Winston Churchill quote and the question about popular will on 9/12/2001. I think it is important not to trust ourselves but so much, which is why the National Initiative (look it up, daggonit!) keeps the established branches of government, and gives said elected officials a chance to weigh in on the initiatives up for vote. On top of that, Supreme Court gets to decide if an initiative is constitutional. I would suggest, although I can't say for sure if it's already established by law, that military action be kept in check by Congress and the president.
OK, so yes, voters are stupid. Thats why they elect scum and then whine about it later. Good news is, if they vote in bad legislation, who do they whine about? They whine about their own stupidity, and with a little luck, they correct it, and then correct the bad legislation. I think Americans should feel responsible for their government's actions instead of at odds with them. Then we can start "talking with the man in the mirror."
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
DebbieKat
12:44AM Feb 12th 2008
I've recently become a Mike Gravel supporter. I had been supporting Kucinich until he ended his candidacy. I had liked what I heard of Gravel during the few debates and chances he was given to speak. I think it's horrendous what our media has done to the presidency. We need to change how we go about choosing our candidates in this country. Too many people rely on the media and, as Mike states in his answer, it IS owned by only 5 corporations. This is a fact. And it's getting worse. Between corporate ownership and advertising dollars, the networks are beholden to their shareholders, owners and advertisers. The citizens are the ones who lose out. Luckily we have the internet, and it seems that at least there is more availability of information on these candidates available this way than any other. But, unfortunately, a majority of Americans only get their news from TV and newspapers. We need to devise a better grassroots way of getting these great candidates like Mike Gravel noticed. I wish I had known more about him sooner. I had no idea what an amazing resume he has until very recently. I happily supported him during my state's caucus. Most folks were there for Obama and a good portion for Clinton. Most people didn't know who Mike was. I don't even know if those running our caucus knew there was a third candidate running because I had to speak up to get my minute to ensure people knew it. It's a sad, sad state this country is in right now. Especially when, even at the caucus, people were going back and forth about who had more experience... Hillary or Obama. And there's Mike Gravel with this extraordinary background and they don't even know he exists.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
DAILY QUOTE
"What I did to you was wrong. I was completely self-centered and only thinking of myself."