Barackula!

The Tyranny of Senators Kennedy and Obama

In the annals of history when one reads about the Democratic Race of 2008, they will not read about ideals and glory of the moment, but the back room deals and the fear that manipulated a party to abdicate all that it once stood for, and that is equality.

It is not equal that two legacy families run by an old man, Ted Kennedy, and the son of Richard Daley Sr chooses their pawn, a black junior senator from Illinois, in order to secure the White House, a White House that Kennedy has coveted since the 1960s. Ted Kennedy and Richard Daley have divided the democratic party in a manner that is more than despicable, but shameful to any man or woman of ideals and hope.

In the annals of history when one reads about the Democratic Race of 2008, one will read about the lack of equality by one race to many. Obama’s victories lie within the caucus framework, where congressmen/senators/political leaders are held captive by a plurality of African Americans who are at war with the freedom of the secret ballot. Without question, the only strength of the Obama/Kennedy Faction is the inner cities and political leadership who that machine supports. Historians will write how Sen. Obama used the speeches of great leaders (faith, hope, charity…Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Paul Douglas, Fulbright, etc) as his own, plagiarized those true and breathless words in order to perpetrate upon the public, and youth, that those words were original to his thoughts. Obama does not create his own speeches – he rewrites old speeches that historically reverberated around the world.

It is not equal that a candidate, due to race, claims victory in caucus states because of threats to Caucasian, Asian, Latino politicos. That is not integration: that is the creation of an oligarchy in the Democratic process, where the party is run by a few, not the many.
It is not equal that Obama and “his SS troops of African Americans” as one Caucasian legislator whispered in Idaho hold captive the majority and all other minorities by their cannon of votes. Historians will write how the Obama campaign used its black constituency to subtly and openly threaten democratic leadership of those of Caucasian, Asian, Middle Eastern descent – their black bullet, their refusal to support a sitting legislator or new candidate if they fail to vote Obama. Sen. Obama’s wife Michelle and Oprah Winfrey will be written as the worst offender of the deadly black bullet of coercion.

Historians will write how in the cold fields of Iowa and the river streets of St. Louis how thousands of Chicago precinct workers descended upon Iowa and Missouri and forced the nation’s first caucus/SuperTuesday primary to play by their rules, not the people’s rules. These advance troops did the unthinkable – they wrote down names of those who opposed Obama, and whispered that if they continued to oppose Obama, their careers as public servants was finished or limited. And historians will write how in the western part of the state, true patriots of equality refused to cavel to the black bullet and stated equivocally to the Chicago Machine, we are men and women of decent and moral fiber, and we will judge as to the issues, not as to false words, or veiled threats. The rest caved in to their fear of being unelectable.

The Tyranny of Senators Kennedy and Obama

It is not equal that this 2008 Democratic election will be written by historians as the ’08 Presidential Race engendered not by race, but by one race, African Americans manipulated by a dying legacy created by Ted Kennedy, a man whose thirst for power is well documented, and whose moral behavior is without question disreputable. Ted premise was not that of his brothers, Jack or Bobby. Ted’s solution to the impoverishment of heart and soul to the African American was to dress them, feed them, and provide them housing – all style and no substance. And thus in the inner cities, the African American languishes amidst poverty, resistant to education, carving a living from petty crime and drugs, sexually permissive, and when prosecuted, Ted Kennedy allowed the African American community to use “race” as a means to escape justice all paid by US taxdollars.

It will be written that under President Bill Clinton, who made tough choices, who provided the inner city with the resources to climb out of that hole - but put limits (3 years) on welfare, increased police within the inner city, prohibited the baby manufacturing by African American women – an industry that was manipulated by the African American male in order to produce higher returns on the welfare money – and provided education and the opportunity in order that a man or woman, irregardless of race, gender, etc would be enabled to leave a corrupt and immoral environment. At the same time, by doing the right thing, Clinton empowered the DEA to shut down and prosecute drug dealers in the cities, in the rurals, and in Central and South America. And it is that environment, the inner cities, who most strongly supports Sen. Obama and his promoters – Ted Kennedy and Richard Daley - and who most strongly resist the campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton.

History will write about the manipulations of the ’08 elections, and how Sen. Ted Kennedy formed with Sen. Obama an agreement, and that come the Democratic Convention in ’08, Ted will be named the Vice Presidential candidate, and if not him, then Kerry, or Richard Daley. And in Massachusetts, the people voted loud and clear they did not want Ted Kennedy/Obama manipulations. Why? Because they know the Chicago Machine and the city patronage system. Who will control the White House? It won’t be anyone from, say, St Louis or Seattle, it will be filled with the Chicago patronage system.

Historians will write of the overt manipulations by the media to influence an election – CNN in favor of an independent candidate or Sen Obama, FOX in favor Romney, and of an assortment of BLOG authors that have no real understanding of history nor political consequence but full of soap box convictions and bully pulpit bragging rights.

History will write many things – not always favorable to Sen. Obama – but one thing is certain – historians will not write kindly of the election of 2008.

Wow, Susan Nation's post was a bull's eye hit on the Democratic battle between Obama and Clinton. As an independent, upon researching the Obama history, and the Clinton history, I think the above is quite appropriate. Obama is part of the Chicago machine, and votes on special interest for the city of Chicago.

At the same time, I would like to point out that the precincts around the univerisities of UC Berkley, Fullerton, San Diego, Stanford, Scripps, and out east, the U of Columbia, MIT, Boston U, Harvard, and Yale voted strongly for Clinton in fact outvoting Obama. I find this a contradiction of the Obama campaign rhetoric.

This campaign is more than confusing - I am beginning to think that we are all back to the same old same old.