Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

The Cost of War, or Proof of Success?

3 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
One year ago, if you had told me that the focus of the anti-war critics would be the dollar cost of the war in Iraq, I would have answered that we had won. And in fact, that is where we are. The ABC headline today trumpets the cost of the war over the next year as being projected at $12 billion per month. That is, no doubt, a lot of money.

The subtext of the report is not especially subtle. It boils down to this: we are winning this war -- a war that the MSM and the American left have committed to lose -- and if we don't do something quick, this thing will get out of control and the history books will lack the moral clarity [Bush Evil!] that they are all counting on.
Make no mistake. There are many, many on the American Left for whom the worst possible outcome in this would be an American victory and a stable, prosperous -- and moderate -- Iraq. They are no more cheering for success in Iraq than they are cheering for a robust economic recovery at home prior to the 2008 election.

But where we go with this war from here is a totally separate question from how we got into it. And anyone who can't parse this distinction has no business in the dialogue.

There are four basic positions for people on this war, outlined in the graph above. Looking back, I'm with those who opposed the war at the outset. But knowing what we thought we knew at the time -- and everyone on both sides at the highest levels had access to the same information -- it looked like the right thing at the time.

But how we got into the war if immaterial to where we are now. I had debates with a colleague prior to the war. He fiercely opposed it, but argued that once we were in, we were morally obligated to do it right -- that is, to give the Iraqi people time to heal and stabilize before we pull the plug and run.

The funny thing is that many of the same people now pushing Cost Benefit Analysis in Iraq are the same people who fiercely opposed CBA when applied to obscure little critters on the Endangered Species list. I'm more than a little more concerned about the Iraqi children than I am about those obscure little critters.

I guess we all have our priorities.
Filed Under: Bush Administration, Iraq

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>