Inside Politics Daily

The Hillary Papers

Posted:
03/20/08

Now that news organizations have had some time to scour the 11,000-plus pages of Hillary Clinton's datebook from her time as first lady, more than a few stories are popping up questioning the credibility of Clinton's claim that her time in the White House should be looked upon in the best possible light as the nation contemplates her bid to return there.

From Reuters we have, "First lady records show Clinton promoted NAFTA." Salient bit:

Demorcatic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton now argues that the North American Free Trade Agreement needs to be renegotiated, but newly released records showed on Wednesday she promoted its passage.

From The Atlantic's Matthew Yglesias comes "Hillary and FMLA." Here's the intro:

Dana Goldstein notes the collapse of Hillary Clinton's argument that she played some kind of key role in passing the Family and Medical Leave Act.

The Associated Press chimes in with, "Clinton Schedules Show Drop in Policy Role":

Hillary Clinton's daily schedules show that her formal policy role in the presidency of her husband, Bill Clinton, shrunk once Congress shelved the health-care plan she helped craft in the administration's first two years.

The British paper The Telegraph adds, "Hillary Clinton papers sink experience claims":

Hillary Clinton's boasts that she gained major foreign policy experience as First Lady have been undermined after 11,046 pages of her White House schedules provided scant evidence to back up her claims.

From The Washington Post comes, "In HIllary Clinton's Datebook, A Shift":

HIllary Rodham Clinton arrived in the White House with a schedule befitting a president, packed with policy sessions, meetings with senators and trips to promote an ambitious political agenda. But after the collapse of her health-care plan in 1994, she retreated to a more traditional first lady's calendar of school visits, hospital tours, photo ops and speeches on a narrower set of issues.

And rounding-out this little round-up is The New York Times which reminds us that the documents themselves were "released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request and a lawsuit." More analysis:

The documents offer no support for her assertions on the campaign trail that she helped negotiate the Irish peace accords or facilitated the flow of refugees in the Balkans, but neither do they disprove them. There is no evidence to back up her assertion that she helped pass the Family and Medical Leave Act, the first legislation Mr. Clinton signed as president in February 1993.

Now, I know what you Clinton supporters are already saying. "Media conspiracy!" My point with this post isn't to say that Hillary Clinton is not qualified to be president, just that maybe not as qualified as she so often claims on the campaign trail.

David Knowles

A journalist, musician and novelist, David Knowles has covered politics at AOL for the past two and a half years...more

Contact David Knowles

subscribe to: RSS email: David Knowles

Related Articles

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Avoid hate speech, foul language or a disrespectful tone in your comments. Unwanted comments will be deleted at the discretion of the moderator.

DAILY QUOTE


"What I did to you was wrong. I was completely self-centered and only thinking of myself."
  • Happening Right Now

     

News From Trusted Politics Daily Partners