Jimmy Carter Nearly Endorses Obama

Given Carter - who I generally think of fondly - in his latest book went bazook and off the wall anti Israel (to the point his top staff at his foundation quit in protest) ----- I am not surprised he sides with Obama - who despite his public comments is very distrusted if push came to shove about the continued existence of the one democracy in the ME

If you want to learn more about Obama go to www.WorldNetDaily.com/

Here's more on Obama lie!

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/03/30/aide_says_obama_erred_on_kennedy_tie?p1=email_to_a_friend
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/03/28/clinton_and_family_leave?p1=email_to_a_friend

elizabeth santilli 10:24
world net daily is a super conservative website the Ann coulter type of news, who cares what they have to say. Do you know where you get your information, or you do not care?
Or maybe that is your type of news, not mine thanks..

LOL How desperate for Obama material can these guys get "Nearly endorses"? That is journalism at its best ROFL

Now Jimmy?? What is it that is sucking these people in? I don't get it. I have totally missed this charisma that Obama reportedly has. In my view, he seems self-absorbed, only doing and saying what will get voters. His campaign is for Obama, not our country. I am saddened that my home state of Georgia has been duped and Carter is mindlessly following.

remember the people he left behind in iran. that was the beginning of our middle east problems.

Hello!!! I'm from Georgia and I know a lot of people that cannot stand Obama. Please Jimmy! I used to like you. Obama is not going to win in November. Mc Cain will win Georgia and also the elections.

The Clintons are all about a laundered image, they don't want you to look in the shadows for fear that you'll see them as they truly are!

Why do people fall for Hillary's Lies?

I never knew how dumb New Yorkers were until they voted in Hillary after Sen. Moynihan retired.

The only reason she moved to New York was for that open senate seat in a Blue State, so she didn't have to face an incumbent – the only way she could win.

Hillary is running on "experience". What Experience?

She was First Lady in the most indicted, scandalous administration in history and a Corporate Lawyer making money for Fat Cats like WalMart and Tyson's Foods, shipping jobs overseas and closing down small to mid-sized rural merchants. That's it!

And as a Senator, she did absolutely nothing.

Hillary came to NY solely as a springboard for a Presidential run.

It's also why she didn't leave Bill for messing around with all those women.

She wants to be President so badly that she'll lie, cheat & steal to get elected. She's been caught in outright lies about TravelGate, Vince Foster, Peter Paul, Norman Hsu, Cattle Futures, her trip to Bosnia, and on and on.

When she releases her tax returns, people will see she's also a cheat and thief. The reason why she's not releasing her tax returns right now, 5 weeks after she said she would, is because of the PA primary - she wants people to vote without knowing the truth.

The Clinton's are nothing more then smooth talking Con Artists and the people that believe them are inexcusably STUPID!

Of course, that is exactly what the Clintons have always counted on!

Urge Hillary to quit NOW! FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY! - http://www.petitiononline.com/ACUDP2/petition-sign.html?

Top 10 Myths Keeping Hillary in the Race

I have noted a number of myths amongst the comments here as to why Hillary should stay in the race.

#1 Myth: This race is tied

No, actually, it's not. Obama has the lead in number of states won, in pledged delegates and in overall delegates. Nothing will happen in the remaining primaries to substantially change that. As to the one thing Hillary does lead in, superdelegates, her quickly shrinking margin is among DNC personnel only. When you look at the elected superdelegates, Congressman, Senators and Governors (i.e. people who actually work with both Obama and Clinton) Obama leads there, too.

#2 Myth: Okay, the popular vote is tied.

There are people who claim that because of the 3% separation, that Obama's lead in the popular vote is a "statistical tie." This is a myth because, when you can actually count things, there's no need of statistics and no such thing as a margin of error. The popular vote is not an estimate based on a sampling, like a poll. Like the general election, there are winners and losers and, so far, Obama is the winner.

#3 Myth: Fine, but what if we count electoral votes? NOW Hillary is ahead!

Not so much. The proportions of electoral votes to population versus delegates to population are pretty comparable. So if you allocated electors proportionally in the same manner that you allocate delegates, Obama is still ahead. If you allocate them on a winner-take-all basis, then that would be the same as allocating the delegates on a winner-take-all basis, so why bring electors into it?

#4 Myth: But if we did do it like the Electoral College, that proves Hillary is more electable than Obama, because of states like California.

This is perhaps the saddest little myth of all. It's ridiculous to suggest that Obama will lose New York and California to McCain because Clinton won them in the primaries. No, come November, those states will join with Obama's Illinois to provide 40% of the electors necessary for him to win.

#5 Myth: Very well, then. But if we counted Michigan and Florida, THEN Hillary would be winning!

Nooo, she wouldn't. The margin would depend on how you allocate the delegates, but Obama would still be ahead. And he'd still be about 100,000 ahead in the popular vote, too, despite not even being on the ballot in Michigan. However, it would enhance Hillary's chances of catching up in the remaining races.

#6 Myth: Ah HA! So Dean is keeping them out just to help Obama! And Obama is keeping them out.

That's two myths, but I'll treat it like one. The only people who can come up with a solution to this problem are the states themselves, to be presented to the Rules and Regulations Committee of the DNC for ratification. It was Rules and Regs, not Howard Dean, who ruled that Florida and Michigan were breaking the rules when they presented their original primary plans. If the two states cannot come up with a plan to reselect delegates, they can try to seat whatever delegates were chosen in the discounted primaries by appealing to the Democratic Convention's Credentialing Committee, which includes many members from Rules and Bylaws.

#7 Myth: If they don't get seated until the convention but a nominee is selected before these poor people get counted then these states are disenfranchised.

There are two ways to debunk this myth: semantically and practically. The first is based on the word "disenfranchised:" these people have not been deprived of their right to vote. Through the actions of their states, their votes don't impact the outcome. Now, you may say that that is specious semantics (Myth: I do say that!) but practically speaking, this is the usual effect of the nominating process, anyway. All of the Republican primaries since McCain clinched the nomination have been meaningless, but those voters are not disenfranchised.
Florida and Michigan tried to become more relevant in the process by breaking the rules. They risked becoming irrelevant instead.

#8 Myth: Well, I say they are disenfranchised, and Hillary Clinton is their champion.

Only when it suits her. Last fall, when the decision was first made to flush 100% of Michigan and Florida delegates, Clinton firmly ratified it. That was because the typical punishment of only 50% representation also kept the candidates from raising money in those states. Figuring that she would wrap up the nomination handily anyway, the clear front-runner agreed with all the other candidates - including Obama - to completely "disenfranchise" those two states.

#9 Myth: Well, never mind 2007. She's doing more now to bring them in.

Not really. Recent stories in the St. Petersburg Times political blog said that 1) the Obama camp has reached out to the Florida Democratic party about a compromise and that 2) the Clinton camp will discuss nothing else but re-votes, which are legally, practically and politically dead.

#10 Myth: Whatever! Hillary can still win! I know she can! She and her 37% positive rating will sweep through the remaining primaries and Michigan and Florida, winning 70% of everything and superdelegates will flock to her banner and Barack Obama will personally nominate her at the Convention and John McCain will give up and George Bush will even quit early so she can take over and... and... and...

This is how you Hillary losers sound...


Urge Hillary to quit NOW! FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY! - http://www.petitiononline.com/ACUDP2/petition-sign.html?

The worst enemy to male control is a woman. Therefore a male is far better for other males even if the male doesn't fit the desirable traits of white males. The violence in the family, community, countries are mostly male driven. If this election had anything to do with common sense, peace, safety for you as an individual, family, community and country you would know where to put your vote. Look at history and the history of men. When did they ever do anything for others than other men or fight other men. Men are about control and to control women and offspring. By making election rules as complicated as possible so that votes don't count.... or fake votes like Cuba and former Soviet Union then control can be maintained without it being to obvious. Who controls the media??? It is not women... so therefore you see this panic that the males display on TV and their endless discussions to create a false sense of the election outcome by asking if the election should not be over now? Before everyone has voted since the media interpretation of the polls are pretty much where they want them to be. The election will give men the ultimate control again and again and again.....

OBAMA and his angry voters are in DENIAL. They are the racist voters and they blame everything on race.

The fact that 25% of black men are in jail, is because of : a) many of them come from ONE PARENT HOMES, b) born OUT OF WEDLOCK, c) have NO SUPERVISION, d) Many of them dont know who their DADDY is.

Making BAD choices, living irresponsibly HAVE CONSEQUENCES. These are the consequences. Dont blame other people for your immorality.

The institution of MARRIAGE was invented thousands of years ago, to provide, safe, secure, nurturing environment for the children and prosperity of the whole family. A family requires input from all its members, and they are supportive of all its members. Look at a family from India or China. They are hard working people and have some of the smartest students and most prosperous happy families. Learn from them.

Put some good old fashioned "moral standards" back in your life, get married first, then have the kids, live an honorable way, show good example to your kids, be good mentors and role models, put FAITH and decency back in your life and all this blaming others will go away.

With other words TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR ACTIONS and be productive citizens of this GREAT COUNTRY.

GOD BLESS AMERICA.
HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT 2008

Carter may have been not that great of a President, but since he has left he has become a better and better American, now even more so with his evident support for Obama!

Jimmy Carter Nearly Endorses Obama

HOW PATHETIC IS OBAMA

I FOR ONE WOULD NOT CONSIDER GETTING CARTERS BACKING GOOD. HE HAS SHOWN HIS DILIKE FOR AMERICA FOR YEARS, SPEAKING IN OTHER COUNTRIES BAD MOUTHING OUR PRESIDENT AND OUR GREAT COUNTRY, HE IS WITHOUT A DOUBT THE WORSE PRESIDENT WE EVER HAD. HE SHOULD JUST SHUT HIS STUPID MOUTH AND GO PICK SOME PEANUTS OR HIS NOSE

Meatrix you must be an absolute perfect person!!!! What a pity!!!!

Urge Hillary to quit NOW! FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY! - http://www.petitiononline.com/ACUDP2/petition-sign.html?

Bill & Chelsea Clinton = Super delegates, both of them!

That ain't right - they're both on Salary to the Clinton Campaign.

Yea, the Democratic Farmer-Labor Party is the Party of the People all right!

We have seen what a cocky and vengeful man can do; Look at Bush. He tried to avenge the battle of his father. Look what happened. VENGENCE IS MINE SAYS THE LORD.

Now you want to replace him with a racist, vengeful muslim bigot like Obama??? I don't think so!!! His non-negotiable commitment is to Africa and his muslim brothers.

My fellow Americans, DON'T COMPROMISE our beloved country. It will have long term effects. Some things can't get "undone".

VOTE HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT. OUR BEST CHOICE. Hillary is a true patriotic American, hard working, intelligent, wise, she knows what needs to be done and how to do it. Hillary can restore America and help us build a prosperous future for our kids and our old age. Help Hillary to work for us, to do the best for us. God Bless Hillary, and God Bless America.

the democrats are getting desperate now and
feel like they have to support obama or risk
losing in november. WAKE UP! there is no
way democrats are going to win in november.
obama has cost the democrats the presidency.

i as a democrat will never vote for that lying
hypocrital bigot and millions of others feel the
same way. i will vote for john mccain in november.
obama cannot win!!!!!! the upside of that is that
hopefully he will slither away for good.

Ah, Jim, how 'rational' you make your argument sound! But your male angst is showing! In your view, ANY man would be better than a woman! Be careful, life is passing you by! Obama is UNELECTABLE, and no amount of hemming and hawing can get around that fact! Carter 'almost' endorsing Obama doesn't surprise me, since I see Obama as being very similar to him. And we (US voters) won't make that mistake again! Carter was a complete 'fish out of water', just as Obama would be, IF he miraculously won (which he won't). But keep flogging the numbers and the polls, if it makes you feel better. The superdelegates have been given 'permission' to vote their 'consciences', which means that they had better use their brains!
HILLARY (OR 'OTHER') IN JANUARY!!!!!!!!