Ron Paul Wins 24% in Idaho, Best Yet

Very intrestine.....at the beginning of the republican party nominations, both MCcain and Ron Paul were not even predicted to be in the presidential race, and now, here we are, with the two candidates who were not even supposed to be in it, running for the president of the United States......go figure

>>>THIS #3 ARTICLE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT COULD BE USED AGAINST OBAMA FOR HIS LINKS TO WRIGHT, REZKO, AYRES, FARAKAN ETC WHICH WOULD DISQUALIFY HIM FROM THIS PRESIDENTIAL RACE!!!!
Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights
3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Why wasn't Ron Paul EVER really in the media?

I don't know enough about that man because of it.

Ron Paul for President !!

Darn, as an Idaho voter I spend the night on the Ron Paul blog, giving them the Sec'y of State's election results hyperlink and cheering them on.

I SO wanted to give TOMMY his tatoo in spite of the fact I have no training, no experience, would probably develop some sort of palsy and had a couple of designs in mind that did not say RP.

For some strange reason the Obama boy did not win by nearly the margin of 79% he got in the caucus as a result of the AK 47 invasion of MoveOn. He got 56% when people actually voted..and those were the ones that heard him speak. Of course a primary win in this Red state and others is meaningless. Republicans outnumber democrats 4/1

TC I am so disappointed, I even went to the hospital where they gave me some used spinal tap needles.

Alas

NEWS FLASH!!!!!!

NEW YORK POST

In an unprecedented move the DNC tried to set a precedent by thwarting the efforts, and cutting off the left leg

off their own Rules committee who favor seating all of the Florida and Michigan voters. They have issued a

press release stating that unnamed lawyers (BO and John Whatshisname). who are afraid of their wives, have

pre-empted the rules committee as part of OPERATION WE DON'T WANT A WOMAN. Of course there are

no rules or laws upon which they based their opinion.

As there are no precedents of course these lawyers took turns stating reasons why the Democratic party
can't afford to nominate a winner for the next Presidential election. The House, the Senate and the Presidency

would be just too much to handle. Party wisdom suggests another McGovern or Dukakis would ease the strain

of having to make Presidential choices which a rookie would surely screw up.

In another unprecedented move these lawyers had a moment of prayer hoping that the electorate does not find

about the illegal activities of MoveOn in the caucus states. A comparison of delegate votes based on

primaries rather than caucus votes surely must be illegal as well because Hillary would win?

These lawyers also suspended the rules requiring that super-delegates vote for the "most electable" as that
would eliminate their candidate

The DNC is praying that no one even thinks of the Supreme Court to resolve this issue.

A statement by Howard Dean. "Well, if this doesn't work...we will think up some other dastardly dead."

=============
Of course this story is a spoof with a lot of truth and plenty of sarcasm.The media consider the New York Post a credible source who;s headlines include "Headless Man found in Strip Bar", whether their stories are true or not..why can't we
.

Electoral Vote Projection.. The only vote that really matters. (as of May 27)

Clinton 327 McCain 194 Tied 17
Obama 266 McCain 248 Tied 24

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Clinton/Maps/

Clinton picked up 8 more electoral votes since the report of 5/24

and those numbers do not include the Hillary supporters that will vote McCain should the need arise:-)


Obama is NOT electable.

For some reason the Obama Pimp Machine does not want to talk about these numbers. Wonder why?

I'm still trying to figure out why I can't do a 'write-in' during the General Election.

TC I never kid except when I am trying to make fun of you using the New York Post as a source for your Clinton/Kennedy farce.

I actually googled images for appropriate snake-in-the grass and pimp pictures that would do honor to your bicep

Yes there were 3 or 4 of us Dems who actually voted but it was the Bush appointed Supreme Court judge who got people out. That race ended up 50/50. Suppose it will go to....the Supreme Court?

I am a Dem, But if Ron Paul get's VP, He has my vote

For some strange reason the Obama boy did not win by nearly the margin of 79% he got in the caucus as a result of the AK 47 invasion of MoveOn. He got 56% when people actually voted..and those were the ones that heard him speak. Of course a primary win in this Red state and others is meaningless. Republicans outnumber democrats 4/1

__________________________________________________
DUH......4-1 Republicans over Democrats. The same or close to it can be said of other Red States Mr. Obama claims to be his in November. I think it's time we all own up to the fact that at this point in time, Hillary Clinton is winning the electoral race in November. Would someone please inform the Hillary haters in the Media. They seem to stuck zero for (O)Bama. Go Hillary, all the way to Denver for justice to served.

Desperate times call for desperate measures. A dig here and a dig there. Why say something nice about Ron Paul?
You know he has no chance to win, so you throw him a bone. Done in order to try and make McCain look bad?
Why not address issues of importance concerning Mr. Obama? Oh that's right, you think if you are a good trooper he will make you maybe press secretary or?

Crystal, I think it's because each state is different, and the candidate has to sign up to be a write-in choice, and some other states only the candidate running for the party would get the vote--so it's like voting for that person who is running.

I don't know I'm pretty confused about it.

But, don't worry, if Hill is not the dem nom, we will all come together to make an organized plan or two that will suit everyone.

Ron Paul is the only canidate thats going to keep us from the North American Union, the amero, the real i.d. card, he is the only one that wants to keep the constitution, Bush, Mccain,Hillary, Obama and the cfr want to do away with it, and all this trouble is going to take place unless we elect Ron Paul as the next president, so stop and think people!!

oh really..........I just checked out that blog on the electoral vote projection, and I am now more confused then ever. If this were true (of which ) I now believe it is, why doesn't the DNC snap about this.... no resume, empty suit, sermon leading hypocrite that he does not have a chance in hell to win the presidential nomination...I will vote for MCcain if Hillary is not the nominee

Katherine:

Thanks for responding. I came across this web site which looks like it may give the answer!

http://mfoster.com/misc/write-in_rules_2008.html

tommy..........point taken.....it almost sounded to good to be true, although it does seem to have some merit, especially if your a Hillary supporter

OK, what does this mean. Republicans still run the winner take all formula so RP has no delegates,right?
I think he's angling for a prime spot to address the convention but I have no idea how his showing in the popular vote gets him any juice. Anybody know?