Mad Hatter Holds Tea Party

Key definitions:

Chicken brain
A small brain
Chicken pecker
A negative person
Pecker brain
A negative person pecking at only negatives
Peckerhead
A negative person pecking negatives that are known to be false.

You earned points here Caleb. Put 'em in your pocket, they're yours.



Thank you Tom. I'm not sure what the question was but that was definitely the definitive answer.

What's really amazing is how people believe it just could not be possible, no it just could not happen in a million years...that an otherwise heterosexual man had sex with another man in the back of a limo and stopped for some drugs along the way.

It happens every day. Prominent men. Men you would never believe it about. Yes, men like Barack Obama.

If Sinclair is lying, fine, but everyone is acting as if he's claiming Barack arrived in a flying saucer and took him to the home planet where they were farming captive earthlings for food.

I got news for you guys, the "down-low" is extremely common in the black community.

Why does Sinclair have no credibility? Is it because he is unattractive (drugs, alchohol and cancer will do that to a person). Is it because he dares to utter a negative about Black Jesus? Is it because Obama is black that it can't be said?

Would you be this outraged if this were John Edwards or any other candidate? I just don't understand what is so outrageous.

Oh and if it's true, and it's common knowledge in the gay community of Chicago, more will come out. LS won't be the only person who will talk.

Please, someone explain what exactly is so unbelieveable and why.

Oh and Caleb, so glad you find the gay person "amusing".

We do after all exist for your amusement...well it's better than when we used to be here as your victims.

I think it's strange that he was arrested today. It's not like he was impossible to contact if there was a warrant. That seems a little orchestrated.

--
Oh, and the weird thing is that the "wild wild west" of the internet does give him attention. I found Larry's website today, and he had hundreds of posts...all giving him encouragement, and calling him a hero, etc. I think he has a little bit of a cult following. Strange.

Well, I still haven't looked up anything about any of this yet. Since you say there is a video...I'll go look it up. C'mon. I gotta see this. lol.

Davidg, I know...I have no idea whether or not Larry is telling the truth, or if he is delusional--or telling the truth and ill at the same time, etc.

But of COURSE it's possible. People do all sorts of things in private and some people DO lead dual lifestyles. They just do.

Katherine, We are adults so we know and understand these things.

Thanks for rescuing me from the Twilight Zone once again!

I just cannot believe the blogs and comments sometimes. It's like everybody is 12!

Oh and PS if anybody has dual lifestyle written all over them it's Barack Obama.

He's hiding something. I don't know what it is that he is hiding, but we all may be wishing it was something as simple as bisexuality by the time he's done with us!

This guy is an obvious serial liar, he even comes complete with a rap sheet spanning 27 years and a wanted poster. He is wanted in Colorado for forging an acquaintance's signature and stealing her tax refunds.

Why would anybody of sound mind give credence to anything such a man has to say?

http://www.co.pueblo.co.us/cgi-bin/webpurbroker.wsc/mostoff.html?name=135062

Michelle Obama is a racist, separatist, angry black panther wanna be. Cindy McCain has more class in her little finger than Obama does in her entire hate-filled body!!!

Michelle Obama was prompted before her appearance on "The View". The members of "the View" were kinder to her. They were more pleasant and down-home with her. They treated Cindy McCain as if they were on a job interview --- much cooler.

Michelle Obama has not acted like a supporting spouse of a candidate. She overstepped the boundaries by focusing on how she feels about America! Her remarks were anti-American. Read her college thesis. She wrote radical, racial, anti-white statements throughout. She and Obama had their children in a so-called church of God with Wright spewing hatred against Americans and shouting “God Damn America”.

Obama can't have it both ways. Michelle Obama needs to choose her words more wisely. If she is going out and speaking as a surrogate for her husband then she will be fair game.

Laura Bush was careful where she went and what she said. Obama's wife cannot be treated differently just because her husband says so.

The DNC opened the door with their attack on Mrs. McCain. Politics is a two way street ,sadly it gets nasty but its been that way for all of civilization. If Obama is going to send her out on the campaign trail, expect the controversy when she makes controversial statements.

What a cry baby he is --- he sure wasn’t defending Bill Clinton when comments were made --- or Chelsea.

MAYBE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA SHOULD VOTE FOR JOHN McCAIN IF HE WANTS JOHN McCAIN TO “PROTECT” HIS WIFE!

Say no to Barack Hussein Obama.

McCain 2008.

I was just about to concede that no chicken awards deserve to be4 given out when I read the coment by HO Obama. But after studying what he is saying, I do think he is a replublican, at least one of those kind that devolve from chicken brained peckerheads.

Davidg,

Here's the deal: Larry has admitted that he's gay, that he has been in jail, that he's been on drugs, that he's, you know, broken the law, and that he's been wild.

In the day and life of Larry, is it REALLY that outlandish that he would meet with a guy--use drugs and give head?

NO. It would just be a party night. A night of many, right? Hmmm, well, if Obama is on the down low, maybe more people will come out. Who knows. I still didn't look into the whole press club thing today, and so I don't know if Donald Young was mentioned.
----------
OT, but I've heard rumors that Frank Marshall Davis was bi or gay, and Obama seemed to admire him a great deal as a mentor. It did make me wonder...you know, sometimes people look for their father figures / mother figures in ways that manifest into a sexual connection. I think Obama must have abandonment issues.

--I watched a small bit of Larry's press interview today, and I don't know him well enough to know if he is lying or not. I'm not sure that he is after watching it though.

Ho Hum Caleb. If the event was so ludicrous why is the media not reporting Sinclairs statements verbatim? Instead you and Tommy boy parading as journalists denigrate Sinclair. A true journalist would remain objective and report on the statement, present that very statement and disseminate the allegations against probability. A true journalist would report and present an unbiased stance with an open opinion and allow the reader to conclude and accept the trash of Sinclair or the objectivity of the reporter. You are one in a mass of Sheeple.

No matter how they try to RE-PACKAGE that nasty piece of Michelle Obama, she will never be an honorable patriotic American. Michelle and Barak are the anti-American racist bigots with committment to Africa.

The Obamas are pretending to be "picture perfect" but its only an act, new packaging, media spin, pretence and an act, its far from the truth.

As per Dr. Phil, a good indication of future behaviour is past behaviour. If we look at the Obamas past behaviour, especially their radical friends and 20 years of Jeremiah Wright mentoring.... NO THANKS ! Send them packing, send the Obamas home to corrupt Chicago where they belong.

I want to see REAL PEOPLE, REAL PATRIOTIC AMERICANS, REAL HEROS. VOTE HILLARY OR MCCAIN. WE WONT BE GUESSING WHERE THEIR ALLIEGENCE IS.

Other Obama "friends" tied to this story???????

Polygraph Operator "Dr." Edward I. Gelb Exposed as a Phony Ph.D.
Past President of the American Polygraph Association Obtained Degree from an Unaccredited Diploma Mill
by George W. Maschke
16 June 2003
Why would one of the most prominent polygraph operators in America falsely pass himself off as a Ph.D.? Edward I. Gelb of Los Angeles isn't saying.

No, the "LaSalle University" that awarded Gelb his "doctorate" turns out to be a defunct, unaccredited diploma mill in Mandeville, Louisiana that was owned and operated by one Thomas James Kirk, A.K.A. Thomas McPherson. In 1996, LaSalle was raided by the FBI, and in 1997 Kirk pled guilty to federal fraud charges

======================================================Dan Parisi INTERNET PORN KING
(May 2004)

Ethics turns up in the strangest places (and is often absent in the places where it belongs.

Certainly we were not expecting to find an ethics hero at the address www.whitehouse.com, the infamous seven year old pornography site that has snagged government employees, schoolchildren researching essays, and unsuspecting web surfers of all stripes who thought they were headed to treasure trove of information about 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, and got, uh, something else. (Note: the real White House site is www.whitehouse.gov. www.whitehouse.org is also worth visiting: it's a satire site.)

Katherine..don't try to google LC, Obama has seen that any negative stories have been removed..Now AOL search still have some info. Wonder why?

Caleb,
according to huffpo, the lawyer says he wears the kilt because his junk is too massive for pants. Don't know how that came up.

Kat, DavidG,
the issue isn't whether it is possible, or even true. The issue is whether it is news, as described in my piece. The minute this gets covered, you'll have every loser with a wet dream on TV, and maybe it will be your candidate.

Davidg -- You seem to come down hard on people who don't want this story to be true. Why is that?

People are allowed their opinions. You clearly want it to be true (I refer to your "He's hiding something. I don't know what" line). That is OK also. So if you are allowed your opinions, why so negative to other people for their opinions?

And you are correct when you say "It happens every day. Prominent men. Men you would never believe it about." Very true. But what you don't mention is for every "prominent man" that hides this sort of scandal there are countless thousands who are exactly what they seem to be.

It is also true that there are lots of people make up lies (or pass on obvious lies) about "prominent men" they don't like. Just read these boards for proof of that. And for some reason, a lot of people will believe whatever lie they read that seems to fit their world-view, no mater how easily disproved it is (again, just read these boards).

Fortunately while there are plenty of people who will give credit to lies because they want it to be true (or discredit truth because they want it to be false), there are even more honest people who will look at the facts and make a reasonable conclusion. Most of the "media" fall into this category. They pride themselves on that virtue. Yes they have opinions and biases, but they are honest enough to report the facts along with their personal slant. (Yes, I know there are exceptions, but I am talking about "most of the time")

So my opinion is that until some credible new organization, or even honest bloggers like Tommy Christopher or Caleb Howe, tells me there is something there to pay attention to -- I'm just going to assume this story is no more credible then your flying saucer example or any other fantasy.

Thanks Tommy Christopher for the slam against McCain the "wet dream" thing...you just can't help yourself can you...you with your great journalistic airs.

When I first heard about Larry Sinclair I went to You Tube and watched the video. My first thought was "no way" for a lot of reasons. I just didn't think it seemed credible. He does not look like a credible person.

Okay, then like everything else with Obama, it starts making sense. Why, if it's such a outrage and such a blatant like, do they not just ignore him? Why did Obama's robotic attack dogs attack him? It's like the birth certificate...why not just produce a certified copy instead of this "certificate of live birth thing"? It's just one more piece in the Obama puzzle.

I think deep down every gay person wants things like this to be true. There's just always that part that says "of course Tom Cruise or fillintheblank" is gay. In that sense, sure, I want it to be true.

Personally, I believe the "down-low" is the least of our worries about Obama (which by the way a good down-low service provider NEVER mentions with regard to the man being serviced...ever, it's the unwritten, universally understood code, another reason I don't believe Sinclair, although he says it's about drugs. In fact, it's kind of against the rules to even mention that the downlow exists. After all these men are "conquests"...they are the men that "don't do that". It's the ultimate mind-f*** to have sex with them).

My "hiding something" statement is easy to explain. I believe that what Obama is hiding is that he is the epitome of what is becoming known as a "liberal fascist". It's liberalism taken to the degree of fascism, don't you dare say that, don't you dare believe that, how dare you express that opinion. You see it every day with his followers. That is what scares me about Obama and what I know in my heart and mind to be true. He will take this country into the gutter.

Again, what's so hard to believe that a man, who in 1999 was what in his 30's, had a night on the town that involved drugs and a bj? It happens millions of times all over the place. Big deal. Again, I say if it were not about "Black Jesus" nobody would be this outraged about Larry Sinclair.

But TC's hissy fit was fun to watch.

OMG I guess Larry Sinclair..( I have never even put his name to paper), I thought it would have given him credence, instead of jail I hope he gets the treatment he most certainly requires! Visions of grandeur.

It would not hurt for his Lawyer?? to seek help as well.
I have never looked at the site or believed any of this but a lot of bloggers sure kept it going.. maybe this will put an end to it once and for all.

yuck I feel dirty...

OK, so has everyone put this "whitey" tape to rest? I remember that was the rally call not too long ago. Sinclair is in jail, "whitey" is back on the Jeffersons, what is gonna be next?