Download the Politics Daily Toolbar
Our new toolbar integrates the latest news and analysis into your Web browser and installs in seconds. Download it now!

Politics DailyPolitics Daily

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • COLUMNISTS
  • TOPICS
  • THE CAPITOLIST
  • WOMAN UP
  • DAILY FLOTUS
  • JUST IN
  • THE CRAM
  • CONTACT

    Stay in Touch

  • Inside Politics Daily

    Maliki's Actual Words

    Posted:
    07/21/08
    Much has been made as to what, exactly, Nuri Al-Maliki said, or didn't say regarding Barack Obama's plan for a 16-month withdrawal from Iraq. Yes, indeed, this is a story with a few twists and turns. First came the story in Germany's Der Spiegel. Then came a wave of stories about that story. Then came a "clarification" issued by an Iraqi government spokesman. Then came a wave of stories about the clarification. Then came word that the Bush Administration had put pressure on the Maliki government to produce the "clarification." Then came a wave of stories on the pressure applied to get the clarification.

    Well, today The New York Times has been provided a copy of the actual interview audio from Der Speigel. Noting that "the interpreter for the interview works for Mr. Maliki's office, not the magazine" (Der Spiegel), The Times included the disputed section in a story today. It reads:

    "Obama's remarks that-if he takes office-in 16 months he would withdraw the forces, we think that this period could increase or decrease a little, but that it could be suitable to end the presence of the forces in Iraq."

    He continued: "Who wants to exit in a quicker way has a better assessment of the situation in Iraq."

    So what's the long and short of all of this? First, Maliki did endorse Obama's withdrawal plan as being the one closest to what he'd like to see implemented. Second, the damage control story put forth by the White House, and the Iraqi government spokesperson-stating that the tape was not translated correctly, and that Maliki's words had been taken out of context-is false. The translator of Maliki's remarks works for Maliki, not Der Spiegel.

    Bottom line: Iraq's Prime Minister thinks Obama has a better timetable, and a "better assessment of the situation in Iraq" than does John McCain.

    Should foreign governments offer opinions on which candidate they prefer? No. And that's partially why Iraq has tried to dial back the story a bit. But even today, they continue to put out the signal that they want a speedy exit of U.S. troops that is closer to Obama's vision. Given that Maliki has moved in Obama's direction, and that even George W, Bush has now endorsed the "Time Horizon" for withdrawing troops, some wonder if John McCain isn't suddenly the "odd man out."

    Maliki and Obama are meeting today in Iraq. I wonder if this matter will happen to come up in conversation.
    Get the new
    PD toolbar!



    Follow PoliticsDaily On Facebook and Twitter,
    and download the new Politics Daily toolbar!

    David Knowles

    A journalist, musician and novelist, David Knowles has covered politics at AOL for the past two and a half years...more

    Contact David Knowles

    subscribe to: RSS email: David Knowles

    Add your comments

    Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

    When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

    To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

    Avoid hate speech, foul language or a disrespectful tone in your comments. Unwanted comments will be deleted at the discretion of the moderator.

    • Happening Right Now

       
    Politics Daily on Facebook

    Other News

     
    News Logo