AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
Much has been made as to what, exactly, Nuri Al-Maliki said, or didn't say regarding Barack Obama's plan for a 16-month withdrawal from Iraq. Yes, indeed, this is a story with a few twists and turns. First came the story in Germany's Der Spiegel. Then came a wave of stories about that story. Then came a "clarification" issued by an Iraqi government spokesman. Then came a wave of stories about the clarification. Then came word that the Bush Administration had put pressure on the Maliki government to produce the "clarification." Then came a wave of stories on the pressure applied to get the clarification.So what's the long and short of all of this? First, Maliki did endorse Obama's withdrawal plan as being the one closest to what he'd like to see implemented. Second, the damage control story put forth by the White House, and the Iraqi government spokesperson-stating that the tape was not translated correctly, and that Maliki's words had been taken out of context-is false. The translator of Maliki's remarks works for Maliki, not Der Spiegel.
"Obama's remarks that-if he takes office-in 16 months he would withdraw the forces, we think that this period could increase or decrease a little, but that it could be suitable to end the presence of the forces in Iraq."
He continued: "Who wants to exit in a quicker way has a better assessment of the situation in Iraq."
Follow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners






Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services