The only similarity between the two stories is a cross in the dirt, but it is hardly an unlikely coincidence that there were practicing Christians in both Russia and Vietnam, or that in the prisons of those two Communist countries the only crosses to be found were etched in the dirt, as easily disappeared as the Christians who drew them.
But those desperate to discredit Senator McCain's record will have to impugn his fellow prisoners as well. Orson Swindle, who was held as a prisoner of war along with McCain, tells the McCain Report that he heard this particular story from McCain "when we first moved in together." That was in the summer of 1971, Swindle said, though "time blurred" and he couldn't be sure. He said it was some time around then that the Vietnamese moved all "36 troublemakers" into the same quarters, where they "talked about everything under the sun."
Checkmate. And apologies I'm sure are welcome, but likely not forthcoming from the usual suspects. In fact Andrew Sullivan, who started this mess, doubled down earlier today and offered up a stirring oratory in defense of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth:
And why are we not allowed to ask these questions, when they relate to one of the most important questions anyone can ask about a president: the question of integrity?
Oops, that wasn't about SBVT, it was about the McCain cross in the dirt stories, but it still works as a defense for a tactic that the left and even McCain himself decries as underhanded and below the belt.
On the earlier threads a couple of commenters accused me of whining against Swiftboat tactics now that "my guy" is the target. Please. I've been consistent... calling in character witnesses for or against a presidential candidate is a perfectly legitimate thing to do in almost all cases. Andrew Sullivan has the perfect right to question McCain's story all he wants. It's a free country and he's free to make a fool of himself.
The main point I'm making is that the left believes that first hand character witnesses killed their guy in 2004 (and it might well have) and they were worried about the same thing happening again. To that end they labeled any kind of investigative research as "swiftboating" in order to have it dismissed in popular media. I have problems with that as I've said, but I'm going to have an even bigger problem with that, if that very same left then goes and uses the exact same tactics against John McCain, but this time without even witnesses! It's beyond brazen, and it's beyond hypocritical and they should be called on it.

