Download the Politics Daily Toolbar
Our new toolbar integrates the latest news and analysis into your Web browser and installs in seconds. Download it now!

Politics DailyPolitics Daily

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • COLUMNISTS
  • TOPICS
  • THE CAPITOLIST
  • WOMAN UP
  • DAILY FLOTUS
  • JUST IN
  • THE CRAM
  • CONTACT
  • Inside Politics Daily

    Obama: No Originalist Judges

    Posted:
    10/30/08
    In an interview with NBC News, Sen. Barack Obama provided a glimpse into how he would select judges for the Supreme Court if he was elected president. Obama indicated that he would have a litmus test for judges; namely, they must believe in a right to "privacy," which Obama said is "implied by the structure of the Constitution."
    "Well, look, I think that you -- what you can ask a judge is about their judicial philosophy. And as somebody who taught constitutional law for ten years, who actually knows a lot of the potential candidates for Supreme Court on the right as well as on the left 'cause I've taught with them or interacted with them in some way -- I can tell you that how a Justice approaches their job, how they describe the path of interpreting the Constitution, I think can tell you a lot.

    And so my criteria, for example, would be -- if a Justice tells me that they only believe the strict letter of the Constitution -- that means that they possibly don't mean -- believe in -- a right to privacy that may not be perfectly enumerated in the Constitution but, you know, that I think is there."
    No originalist judges need apply.

    The right to privacy is a code word for abortion rights. The focus of liberal jurisprudence since Roe v. Wade first conferred the right to an abortion has been the protection of that "right," which draws from the "right to privacy" enumerated not in the Constitution, but in the 1965 Griswold v. Connecticut decision of the Supreme Court. In that decision, the Court famously held that the rights in the Constitution have, "penumbras formed by emanations from those guarantees that give them life and substance." In other words, the text of the Constitution does not have the plain meaning that the words would otherwise imply. It is a formulation that allows liberal jurists to find any "right" that they can think of in the Constitution. And one with which Sen. Obama appears to agree.
    Get the new
    PD toolbar!



    Follow PoliticsDaily On Facebook and Twitter,
    and download the new Politics Daily toolbar!

    Mark Impomeni

    Mark Impomeni is not a journalist, or a pundit, but a citizen with a keen interest in national issues. Skeptical and argumentative...more

    Contact Mark Impomeni

    subscribe to: RSS email: Mark Impomeni

    Add your comments

    Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

    When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

    To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

    Avoid hate speech, foul language or a disrespectful tone in your comments. Unwanted comments will be deleted at the discretion of the moderator.

    • Happening Right Now

       

    Other News

     
    News Logo