At least two of the Big 3 auto executives will be driving themselves to Washington this week to ask for a $25 billion loan.
I told you last week that the CEOs of Ford, Chrysler and GM were pondering how to orchestrate a giant carpool from Detroit to Washington. Well, today there's news that Ford CEO Alan Mulally will in fact drive the nine hours to the nation's capital in a Ford Escape hybrid. GM CEO Rick Wagoner reportedly will be driving a hybrid Chevrolet Malibu. Citing security reasons, Chrysler won't comment the travel plans of its CEO, Robert Nardelli.
The Big 3 will be testifying Thursday and Friday before Congress. They were told after their November hearing to go back to Detroit and come up with an actual plan of what they would do with the loan if they got it - and how they would cut costs on their own.
The companies each submitted their own plan today. A common theme is that all the CEOs may be getting a future salary of only $1 a year. Part of GM's strategy includes that salary for Wagoner. He made $1.65 million in 2007, and $2.2 million in 2008. Ford's plan also calls for Mulally to get that measly salary (he made $21 million last year), and for selling its five corporate jets. That company wants a $9 billion loan. while Chrysler's Nardelli told Congress last month he would agree to a $1-a-year salary.
Meanwhile, in order to tell the world that Ford does in fact have quality hybrid cars worthy of American dollars (many of which are going to Toyota for those fabulous Priuses), the company has launched "The Ford Story." It includes details about its business plan, profit targets, and electric car strategy.
"At Ford, we are headed in a new direction," the site says. "After turning a profit this year in the first quarter and making significant progress on cost reductions, we were hit by a spike in gas prices followed by the current credit crisis. But instead of belaboring that, we'd like you to know how very far Ford has come and how bright our future is."
Ford said today it expects to break even or be profitable in 2011 and wants the $9 billion bridge loans to support its restructuring. The news sent Ford's shares soaring about 13 percent in morning trading. Mulally called the loan "a critical backstop" Ford may not have to access.
Here's Mulally telling us why Ford is a company to believe in:
Liza Porteus Viana has been a political journalist for almost 10 years, both in Washington and New York. She loves politics - the smell of it, the sport of it...more
TOO LITTLE TOO LATE < THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE FED UP WITH THESE SO CALLED LEADERS OF THE CAR COMPANIES> THEY ARE NOTHING MORE THAN GREEDY CROOKS> LETS SEE THEM PUT UP THEIR MILLIONS ALONG WITH OUR TAXPAYER MONIES>>> NEVER HAPPEN! THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAY ( NO ) BAILOUT. LET THEM START FROM SCRATCH JUST LIKE WE HAVE TO !!!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
Clif Kuplen
3:22PM Dec 2nd 2008
It's funny how right wingers have no problem whatsoever when six or seven thousand multimillionaire/billionaire investors (the Bear Stearns hedge fund) come to the government saying they blew their money trading on margin and want thirty billion more from the poor people's taxes or borrowed from the Chinese communists so they can throw that away too, but when an industry vital not only to American defense and national security but the well being of the entire American middle class is in danger of shutting down, they no speak english.
What is it about fascism that makes you both suicidal and psychotic?
Why is the well being of some putz that makes dividend money on his investments in enemy nations and preemptive wars while lying around the pool waiting for you to pay his infrastructure bill important and your next door neighbor who pays twice as much in taxes expendable?
That's just plain nuts.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
DebP
3:30PM Dec 2nd 2008
I am bothered by all the companies, states and industries begging for money to cover up their mismanagement...so Clif your blanket generalizations are inaccurate at best.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
Ruby
3:53PM Dec 2nd 2008
There should be no bailouts for GM, Ford, and Chrysler; no bailouts for investment companies or banks; no bailouts for mortgage companies including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; no bailouts for state or city governments. (Did I leave anyone out?)
Let them rewrite their labor contracts and salaries so they can compete on their dime, and not put the government and the taxpayers deeper in debt.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
Clif Kuplen
4:30PM Dec 2nd 2008
I am bothered by all the companies, states and industries begging for money to cover up their mismanagement...so Clif your blanket generalizations are inaccurate at best.
xxxx
I gave you no blanket generalization but instead iterated specifics. Your reply was indeed an attempt to do what you accuse me of, about the only strategy the wing has ever had.
Nobody's impressed with that kind of half swipe any more since it means their educations, their jobs, their homes and their futures and they get nothing but chin music and gimme from the right wing.
You know capital gains is taxed at half the rate that a person with a job is taxed and Obama promised to do something about that. Why is that a problem for you?
You know or ought to that since Bush the redistribution of wealth to the wealthy is the worst in our history. The three hundred wealthiest individuals in this country earn more in capital gains than the poorest one hundred fifty million American wage earners since Bush. You probably don't know that this was all unlawful, but it was and still is. There may be some changes back to corporate law and order in the coming years.
Like in teddy Roosevelt's time, it's time for trust busting. We've had thirty years of restraint of domestic trade in favor of corporatism and it's way past time to do something about that.