Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Vitter's Porn Star Rival Might Not Want Pay Cut to Senator

3 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Adult Entertainer Stormy Daniels seems to be on a regular media blitz. When I initially reported on Daniels, she was a bystander in her own Senate race. Today, though, she's already spoken to The Daily Beast, and now she tells CNN that the tough economy might keep her out of the Senate:



Of course, there are ways to supplement your income as a public servant. Just ask Rod Blagojevich.

Stormy, however, seems too dignified for the Senate, let alone Blago-style antics.
Given a choice, would you vote for Stormy Daniels or David Vitter for Senate?
David Vitter29 (18.1%)
Stormy Daniels131 (81.9%)




Tommy on: BlogTalkRadio I Digg! I Facebook I Twitter
Order The Audacity of Democracy Starring Tommy Christopher
Filed Under: Senate, Republicans

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>