Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

The Case for Arlen Specter to Replace David Souter (Not as Absurd as You Think)

6 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Vanity Fair's Nell Scovell has written a piece advocating for Anita Hill to replace Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court. I figured I would play along with a less absurd choice -- and suggest Senator Arlen Specter.

Considering the likely prospects of Obama nominating a young liberal who might be around for decades, conservatives would probably jump at the chance to support Specter. Republicans probably can't block an Obama nominee, but for public relations purposes, it's always good to have a smooth confirmation -- and Republicans would see Specter as the best choice they option they could hope for.

And what would Barack Obama get out of it? More than you think ...

First, he could honestly say he picked a highly-qualified (aside from being a U.S. Senator, Specter is a lawyer and former District Attorney) and experienced leader who is -- by definition -- bi-partisan.

Specter would also be confirmed without a fight, which would allow Obama to expend energy on other fights, such as health care. Specter's likely smooth confirmation might make him even more desirable as a second choice -- if Obama's first nominee were to run into problems (just as Harriet Miers did).

A Specter appointment would also clear the way for a real Democrat to be appointed by Governor Ed Rendell. (Remember, Arlen Specter is an iconoclast and cannot be counted on as a reliable liberal vote. Having a reliable liberal in his seat might come in handy when it comes time to fill the next vacated Supreme Court seat.)

Perhaps most important reason Obama should consider this is to avoid angering Democratic Senators -- who have already voiced concern that Specter -- who outranks almost everybody in terms of tenure -- might hurt their chances of chairing committees. As The Hill reported this week,

"I won't be happy if I don't get to chair something because of Arlen Specter," said Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), who sits on the Appropriations Committee with Specter and is fifth in seniority among Democrats ...

Lastly, picking Arlen Specter allows Obama to avoid offending any one identity group within the liberal coalition. Picking a woman might anger some liberal Hispanics. Picking a Hispanic might anger some African-American liberals. A Specter selection would allow Obama to avoid picking and choosing between liberal identity groups, all under the guise of making a statesmanlike bipartisan selection.

Arlen Specter for Supreme Court Justice. ... Not as absurd an idea as you thought, huh?

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>