Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Wanted: Fresh Perspective on the Supreme Court

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Since U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter announced his intention to resign, my hope has been that President Obama would enrich the bench by appointing a woman -- and that he would select one with tremendous legal skills who reflected the nation's ethnic, racial or cultural diversity.
U.S. Judge Sonia Sontomayor of the U.S. Court of Appeals, the Second Circuit, is one of the names being mentioned as a potential appointee to replace Souter. The 55-year-old judge may not be Obama's final choice, but I like the cultural narrative she represents -- the daughter of Puerto Rican parents in the South Bronx -- her father a laborer and her mom a nurse. Sontomayor said in a story for the American Bar Association that at age nine or 10, she wanted to be a detective like the mystery book character Nancy Drew, but figured she couldn't because she contracted diabetes at age eight. Then she discovered TV's Perry Mason.

Sontomayor also is a woman with Ivy League roots, having attended Princeton University and Yale Law School. She has worked as an assistant district attorney in the New York County District Attorney's office and in private practice. On being a judge, here's a quote from the American Bar Association:

"The practice of law is perhaps the most diverse, eclectic exposure to life that you can receive," she explained. "People come to you with their problems, and their cases cover a wide range of issues. For you to be able to practice law with the vision it requires, you have to be a very well-rounded person because whatever happens out in the real world, whether it involves business or family or technology, usually finds its way into the courtroom."

Sontomayor, and other candidates like her, could bring a fresh perspective, as well as extensive legal experience, that widens the cultural depth of the court. That's imperative for whomever the appointee is. Male or female. For if the court does not more closely represent the country it governs, it runs the risk of leading with a hollow voice in a nation with swiftly changing demographics, needs and challenges.

The law must be applied, but the heart of the law must not be neglected. Can a court fully lead with wisdom and sensitivity if its intellectual reach is limited because it lacks a larger collective of cultural insight?
Filed Under: Woman Up

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>