The paramour of presidential candidate John Edwards has a little girl, about whose paternity, his wife Elizabeth tells Oprah in an exclusive interview airing Thursday, she has "no idea." (Patricia Murphy has an excerpt here) Oprah could ask Elizabeth about the child, and she agreed to answer, because Elizabeth is promoting a memoir about her personal humiliation and devastating illness titled Resilience.
I, for one, am in awe of Mrs. Edwards' resilience. She has weathered a number of blows and currently is battling incurable cancer. Mrs. Edwards' appearance on Oprah's show will guarantee her book a large audience, but Elizabeth made one condition as a fig leaf to her privacy. The name of that little girl's mother, Rielle Hunter, was not to be mentioned during the interview. The publisher, Random House, inserted language forbidding the host to specifically say the name of the filmmaker with whom the author's husband had a rather complicated illicit affair, into their appearance agreement. I can't imagine what it must be like to be in Elizabeth Edwards' unique situation, let alone want to share that experience. Ms. Winfrey's program is the kick off event for this sharing which, as an example of its title, Elizabeth mustered the fortitude to write. (The contract did not prohibit the topic of her husband's lover, as Oprah's ratings will no doubt soon bear out.) Mrs. Edwards calls the other woman "pathetic" and describes her as a groupie. I'm sure she has much more to say in her book which I certainly plan to read.
I have to agree with the wife here that the other woman behaved despicably in the pursuit of an unavailable man in the public spotlight. It must be sweet revenge for his 59-year-old wife to trash her so publicly and to keep her philandering husband on his best behavior, to boot. But there are a couple things that bother me. One is the name thing seems needlessly pissy. We all know it. Rielle Hunter. Besides, Rielle Hunter is writing her own version of her great love match with John Edwards (speaking of "pathetic") so if we forget her name, she'll remind us.
The other thing is more personal to the Edwards. Nobody knows what goes on inside a marriage except the two people in it, no matter how public the betrayal. But since Elizabeth is sharing, I just want to ask about the daughter who, let's face it, may be a sibling to her three living children and to Wade, the son she buried. Mrs. Edwards understands mortality. If the medical predictions are correct, she will be facing her own before long, but that little girl is only one year old. The child's name is Frances but she reminds me of Pearl, the blameless child of Hester Prynne and conflicted preacher Arthur Dimmesdale in Nathanial Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter. When Elizabeth Edwards learns the child's paternity, and we can trust the National Enquirer to help her find out, won't she want to explain to her children, if it turns out to be so, that they have a little sister?
John Edwards allegedly struck his wife, Elizabeth, around the Christmas holidays, in what the National Enquirer on Wednesday called "a horrific marriage-ending fight." This is the first time physical...
In a statement given to NBC News , former Democratic senator John Edwards admitted Thursday that he fathered a child with a campaign videographer during his 2008 presidential run. Edwards had...
With all due respect, I could not disagree more with the notion that Elizabeth Edwards has her priorities straight .
It's not that I'm not sympathetic to her situation. (If you're not up on the...
Wow! someone who finally had the guts to say the only and right thing to say: Little Francis is the innocent here. Let us hope that Mrs. Edwards, who has weathered so many storms, will grab this final and the hardest of task by the horns and make the way for Francis in the event that Francis is her children's sister. What a beautiful last lesson to teach one's children-forgiveness and the importance of kin.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (7)
sandsnnydz
8:42PM May 5th 2009
Really enjoyed the article Elizabeth Edwards is a women of great resilience the best choice of words for her book title.
I still do not understand her backing her husbands run for President (and will never understand what he was thinking) considering all that was actually going on in their life but thats her business....
the other women (I have already forgotten her name is) .... scum, I think it was...is the worst kind of evil I can't believe she has the gall to write a book about the affair ...this proves she was in it for the money and nothing else ....no one could be that cruel.... could they?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (5)
fell
9:29PM May 5th 2009
omg/ John Edwards is a confirmed whore,and now we find Elizabeth is willing to be another whore (a venal or unscrupulous person) in her family, so she can drag out this story for money. John was in it for sex; Elizabth is now in it for money. Which is the whore?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-2)
jajemmell
9:53PM May 5th 2009
this whole thing is sad. here is a woman who was betrayed by her husband. she is stillkeeping him? why? he was CAUGHT in a lie after a lie and was busted in a stake out visiting this woman and her/his daughter, then he was forced to confessed because he was busted. i don't understand why Eliot Spitzer-former Dem gov of NY who paid thousands for prosittues and his wife is still w/him. both of these men are political whores, it is all about them (power, money, adoring fans) Elizabeth has many supportors and John knows he will be crucified merciless if he leaves her. what is sad is this little girl who is innocent and her father is refusing to acknowledge her.
i feel sorry for Elizabeth Edwards, to be publicity humiliated again and again and at the same time i admire her courage, i would admire her even more if she acknowledges what we all already know, that Frances is her Husband's daughter.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
helena
12:57AM May 6th 2009
I truly feel sorry for what she has gone through & publicly at that. But,why didn't she see the train coming? In this age of 24 hr. news how could they both think that this story could be hidden especially since he chose to run for president? She stood by him when he talked of being accountable & looking for truth etc. with a straight face. How arrogant! knowing what he already knew. She is not a victim,she is an enabler.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
Norm
8:59AM May 6th 2009
Leave Elizabeth alone for goodness sake. She has Cancer and her husband had an affair that may have produced a child. She has enough on her plate without the public questioning her reasons for staying with John.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
katedefr
11:18AM May 6th 2009
I'm truly amazed at Elizabeth Edwards. Resilience? Give me a break. I understand why she stays with Pretty Boy, given that she has terminal cancer. But, I have NEVER encountered a woman so thoroughly committed to capitalize on one personal tragedy after another. Now she's doing it again. I admit that it is very hard to imagine how I - or anyone else - learns to cope with the fact that are dying and dying soon. But, this tendency of hers predates the recurrence of her cancer. I don't admire her. For those who say they do, I wonder if they would want their daughters to be like her. I most certainly would not.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
lindablaba
11:39AM May 6th 2009
I agree with the one post that questions why Elizabeth would spend what limited time she has left, shilling her book and dredging up the pain for her AND her children of their father's betrayal instead of being a loving Mom to her children for as long as she can.
As far as Rielle being scum, no, John is the scum. He's the one who betrayed and lied to his wife and family and to all of America. Rielle is single and made no promises to anyone. Elizabeth is just kidding herself if she thinks John was a victim. She's supposed to be such an intelligent woman, but evidently that's clearly not the case.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (3)
sandsnnydz
1:21PM May 7th 2009
SCUM IS just as much to blame as John Pond Scum Edwards is to blame it took TWO PEOPLE TO MAKE THAT BABY ..... Ms. Scum KNEW Edwards was married and Edwards WIFE had cancer at the time yet she went after him she waited for him outside a hotel she knew exactly what she wanted and exactly what she was doing totally... with intent .... women like this are their own worst enemies again her name IS "SCUM" ..... and will remain so in my book
RATE THIS COMMENT: (8)
BonBon
12:30PM May 6th 2009
I agree, when you are terminally ill, you've lost a son and your husband has cheated on you while ill, the last thing I would want to do in my dying days is rehash this whole thing, I almost think this is her last dig at John for the whole thing without totally leaving him. Rielle is a loser also, jumping into bed with a
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
Marital Musings
2:54PM May 6th 2009
I do feel sorry for Elizabeth Edwards, particularly if her cancer is terminal. I can't imagine facing leaving your young children. However I was very disappointed to hear her suggest that the other woman "seduced" her husband. He is responsible for his own actions, even if someone tells him he is "hot".
John Edwards is a disgusting person. He should be kissing his wifes behind. He will have to live with the knowledge that his disgusting behavior hastened his wife's death.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (3)
sweetbabi3
9:21PM May 6th 2009
Elizabeth needs to grow up. This has happened to many of us, and the child is an innocent. Calling the mistress a groupie is so lame. It happens. She may not like it, but she does not seem to be putting any blame on Edwards. I never cared for the man, and he was living a lie. For Elizabeth to go along with his run for President knowing he had an affair is disgusting. I do not find Elizabeth the Victim. She needs to get a grip. She may not live, and her children will need a father and mother. The mistress will do just fine in that department. Don't poison the kids minds.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
laddie4563
10:45AM May 7th 2009
Take a cue from Jackie Kennedy who kept her private life to herself. That is why they call it private!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
lelapin53
12:43PM May 8th 2009
I must comment on some facts that I believe have been ignored. Tragically the Edwards family lost their teenaged and only son several years ago. When Mrs. Edwards was approaching menopause and in her late forties or early fifties, she began hormone therapy in an effort to again ovulate and conceive. I believe this was done in large part for her husband to have a son. She became pregnant with a daughter, and a year or two later became pregnant again, finally bearing a son. Some years after that she was diagnosed with cancer, I believe a direct result of the intensive hormone therapy. How does her husband show his gratitude; he has an affair with a campaign worker. When one examines all that went on prior to his indiscretion it seems even more despicable.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (5)
amom
11:06AM May 10th 2009
Affairs take two people. John Edwards, as good a man and as good a dad as he was in the past. allowed himself to give in to the "person" who sought him out and made sure she was around. There are no perfect people. There's also no accounting for personal taste. Even ill, Elizabeth Edwards is three times the person "the other woman" will ever be----which is true in most cases of long marriages experiencing the same fate. Husbands forget what their wives do---maintaining the home, pumping the male ego, the millions of "mom" duties, cooking favorite meals, errands, etc,. etc. as well as holding a job! Of course a footloose---a loose in many ways---younger woman looks good---but she couldn't carry the wife's dirty laundry. It's a sad fact of American life, it seems, that this happens to many families. Should she kick him out? Yes, but then she also ends up alone as she fights a losing fight with cancer. For other women, if they kick "him" out, they end up poor and starting over after a lifetime of work. There is no easy answer--unless you are on the outside looking in. John Edwards needs to shower Elizabeth with love and thank God for her everyday. Their family life will NEVER be the same. There's already been 2 deaths in their family: Wade and trust. But he owes her as "happy" an ending as he can give her.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (4)
clane64076
1:23PM May 10th 2009
John Edwards has shown his true colors. He is a snake, a man who doesn't care about his wife or family's feelings, only for his own. Americans always seem to favor the good looking, rich, political candidate who gives off the movie star image filled with charisma and charm. It's hard to imagine how John looks at himself in the mirror each day after hurting so many people. Rielle (what a horrible name, how do you pronounce it?)is a scheming, manipulating whore. They always seem to have babies so when it ends they can sue for child support. Soon we will see a nudie of her on Penthouse. I plan to use it to house my birdcage
RATE THIS COMMENT: (3)
sesnsible1
2:55PM May 10th 2009
I do agree with most of the comments here....I believe if Elizabeth Edwards were a well woman, her response/reaction may be very different. She most likely wrote this book, not for the money, but so she could put her feelings down on paper and have "closure". She is teaching her children a remarable lesson, as this is a Remarkable person herself! Perhaps it seems she maybe in a little bit of denial, but she wants her remaining days to be as positive for herself and her family, that includes John.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
lorrainetalsma
4:59PM May 10th 2009
If she left him and she walked in and took over , she would end up alone and broke in the best part of there life together, Like me .And it not funny. Theree is no one to be thee for you as much as you can'stand him. He would be a help MABEY
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-2)
mollystarbucks
7:36PM May 10th 2009
I saw the interview and felt like slapping Mrs. Edwards during the entire interview. Why was it necessary to drag this entire episode once again in front of her children? Haven't they been humiliated enough. As to not acknowledging the woman who obviously held quite a fancy for her husband including the possibility of a child makes me wonder why is Joh Edwards with this insipid woman. If this was my man I would demand a paternity test to get this entire sordid affair out in the open and help an innocent child. I have more respect for the mistress then I have for Mrs. Edwards...what was her purpose? was it to finally put the final nail in the coffin to make sure her husband's chances of ever redeeming himnself would never come true. She doesn't love this man and I dare say never has for some time. He is a good looking guy. she on the other hand was a heavy, dowdy looking woman who smiled from ear to ear without much credibility. If he stayed it was her fault for letting herself become so fat. I feel sorry for her cancer trust me, but that is no excuse to continue to humiliate a man who obviously has stood by even after he met someone I dare say he loves. I think the winner in this one is the mistress who has kept her silence and I hope for the sake of her child. She has shown a little class . I don't care much for Mrs Edward at this point