I mean, after all, this isn't a windmill or another transmission line. We're talking about terror suspect currently housed at Guantanamo Bay. President Obama wants to close the prison, so the detainees have to go somewhere - few countries are volunteering to take them. And who wants a bunch of Al Qaeda-types near their home? Anyone? Maybe Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pa. Anyone else? A lot of Republicans certainly don't, either.
Top House Republicans today introduced a bill that would block the transfer or release into the United States of any Gitmo detainees. It requires pre-approval from governors and state legislatures to transfer or release any terrorist detainee into their respective state at least 60 days before the transfer. And if any detainee is sent to Kansas, Virginia, or anywhere else there's a sufficient prison - certain criteria and certification standards must be met. The bill also mandates that Obama detail the possible impact of transferring the detainee to U.S. soil on their ability to win a federal court's order for their release.
"This bill has a straightforward but vital purpose: To ensure that the terrorists held in the Guantanamo Bay prison are not imported into the United States," said House Republican Minority Leader John Boehner.
House Republican Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., has signed on. He's also an original co-sponsor of H.R. 1186, which seeks to prohibit Gitmo prisoners from being transferred to federal prisons or military bases in Virginia. There are two Virginia facilities on the list of potential sites for detainee relocation - Naval Base Norfolk and around Quantico.
"This is the one area where I'm going to take a protectionist stance-protection from terrorists. If there's ever a time for protectionism, this is it," Cantor said today. "I am particularly passionate about making sure that the President's desire, and some in this congress, to bring these enemy combatants to the soil of the United States does not happen. "
"Obviously, the Guantanamo Bay I'm speaking of houses 'terrorists.' I've been there and there are 'terrorists' at Gitmo! Not 'enemy combatants' fighting in an 'Overseas Contingency Operation' – but terrorists, against whom we must wage a War on Terror because they continually plan to launch attacks against us. ...We have seen a change in how those who are incarcerated at Gitmo are now being defined and described both by the media, by the Administration and, as a consequence, by some Americans. I understand that there is a poor perception of Guantanamo Bay. But to say there are no terrorists there, to say there are not even 'enemy combatants there,' is doing a disservice to us all by trivializing the crimes committed by the men at Guantanamo Bay. Mr. President, I ask you: When did we start making terror politically correct? And why?"
Republicans have blasted Obama for closing Gitmo without a clear plan on where the inmates would go. As of today, it seems no such plan yet exists, and Obama wants it shut down by January 2010. House Appropriations Committee Chairman Dave Obey, D-Wis., said the administration hasn't yet submitted a "concrete" plan on how to handle the detainees, so it's request for hasn't been met. Obama wants $50 million for the Defense Department and $30 million for the Justice Department to help close the camp.
This does not seem to be a partisan issue, merely that Republicans have more freedom to criticize any plans to bring possible terrorists to their states than Democrats do. Complaining about the president when he's one of yours isn't a politically popular thing to do around Washington. But still, Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., voiced her doubts today as Attorney General Eric Holder tried to assuage concerns that terrorists would just be "released" into the U.S. Mikulski, who chaired the subcommittee hearing today at which Holder testified, said she and other lawmakers "would be very concerned" about not being consulted on what the plans are for detainees brought to the U.S.
"We have to make sure that streets and neighborhoods don't think that they're going to be the repository of Guantanamo prisoners," she said.
Liza Porteus Viana has been a political journalist for almost 10 years, both in Washington and New York. She loves politics - the smell of it, the sport of it...more
The last thing we need in our prison system is a bunch of anti-American nuts. Prisons are a networking system for many career criminals, thanks to our legal system. A group of Al Qaeda radicals could grow cells from our prison system. If you don't believe that is possible, look at some of the Mexican gangs that have grown in that environment. There are criminals in prison that could adopt the extreme Islamic identity and give the US more trouble the Tim McVeigh ever could. Keep them out of the US!!!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (3)
spikeritz
5:52PM May 7th 2009
It will just encourage our soldiers to shoot more of them on the battlefield. Which does have pluses. My team and I in Afghanistan personally encountered a former GITMO prisoner setting an IED. Needless to say he will never set another. The folks in GITMO are not non-combatants, they are the worst of the worst. Closing GITMO is a bad idea, letting them loose on our soil is even worse. This administration does not know what National Security is or what it takes to achieve it. It is only a matter of time before we are attacked again by these nuts.... God help us.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
greatgoog3
10:35PM May 7th 2009
Yeah, they are the worst of the worst. What you don't mention is that they weren't that way when they were falsely accused by others and sold to the idiots in the U.S. military who decided to pay large amounts of money to anyone who turned in a "terrorist," no questions asked and no proof required. If someone offered you $10,000 for turning in a "terrorist sympathizer," no proof required, can you think of someone you could live without? Of course, after seven years of torture, what was done at Gitmo being nothing compared to the horrors they suffered at Bagram, they are pretty eager to kill some Americans at this point. Can you blame them?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
ADA
6:00PM May 7th 2009
ARE BUSH AND CHENEY IN?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-3)
Peggy
6:02PM May 7th 2009
At the least, if they are released in the U.S., the detainees should be required to register with a state or local law enforcement agency. The list should be available to the public on request. Amercans have the right to know when suspected terrorists who are known to the government live next door to them.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
youngturkssuck
7:59PM May 7th 2009
I have never heard such a stupid response. We can register all the "suspected terrorists" and they can move next door to you.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
kguy
7:29PM May 7th 2009
Thanks for writing on an important and complicated issue. The 17 Uighurs, chinese Islamist have been freed to go for years. The problem appears to be that their Counrty, China, does not sanction reneged merceniary activity, punishable by death. So please Mr President, tell us what you propose for the Uighurs? (pronounced "wee gers". Perhaps a boat and bus ride to San Fransico?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-2)
kguy
7:31PM May 7th 2009
Thats works well for sexual offenders ??
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
greatgoog3
10:45PM May 7th 2009
You have a point, only because they'd be run the same way though. When a fifteen year old girl who is charged with "sexting" would be put on the list if convicted and you can't get off the list, no wonder the system is so ineffective. I think those lists are the worst idea, okay maybe not worst but they are up there... And, in a perfect parallel, what better way to make a former terrorist freak out and decide to relapse than making sure all his paranoid, bible-thumping, intolerant neighbors know to harass him and spread rumors. This world has lost its collective mind...
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
DD8V92
8:08PM May 7th 2009
They could let them stay with Pelosi for 30 days, then go over to Barney Franks place for the next 30 days. Ole Barney could show them some unique hospitality.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
greatgoog3
8:21PM May 7th 2009
Guys, what on earth is wrong with all of you? McVeigh's conspirator is a terrorist and Terry Nichols seems to be doing just fine in the U.S. prison system. Child rapists, mass murders, cartel members and mob bosses are all held perfectly well by our prisons. Bush and Cheney really brainwashed you guys, huh? Do you think Islamic extremists have super powers of some sort? Able to fly, bend steel, and mezmerize guards: how could our prisons hold such people? They can read the koran until their guards are literally bored to death, then snatch the keys and flee, using their extreme Islam-powers to turn water into nitroglycerine? Wow. I never realized conservatives were actually retarded - I always thought it was just an act to generate empathy in their constituents.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-2)
kunzsp
8:21PM May 7th 2009
I do not understand where President Obama is coming from. His position to close G.Bay strikes me as Unamerican and a risk to our national security. Can we take 4 more years of him. I don't think so.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
greatgoog3
8:26PM May 7th 2009
Are you serious? Most Islamic prisoners are black, the non-prisoner black community has a large Islamic subsection, and we don't have problems from them now. Why would they suddenly turn extremist?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
greatgoog3
8:31PM May 7th 2009
This is hilarious. I can't wait till the Repubs start whining and picking apart Obama's plan to cut wasteful spending. Soon they'll be calling fiscal responsibility unamerican just because Obama is for it. I can't believe this is even an issue.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
jparchery02
5:40PM May 8th 2009
cut wasteful spending ???? you dumb ass this idiot just spent more of our money than every president in the history of this country combined and you think he is going to cut wasteful spending.... I have to ask you one question.......... does being stupid hurt ? your messiah chairman obama has destroyed this country in under 100 days you pinheads cried about bushs spending for 8 years but think obama is great for spending three times as much as bush did in 8 years in under 100 days oh and you cried about bush listening in on your phone calls and said you lost your freedoms and chairman obama said he would put a stop to that but he hasn't and he aint going to but not a word about it from you liberal hypocrites ....fvck chairman obama and the camel he rode in on
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
Michelle
9:25PM May 7th 2009
like its contagious or something...
just like a bunch of girlygirls...sissy, whinning, sniffling babies...
I say, bring them to Texas, we'll handle them...since the rest of the country is all wigged out over it, let the state with the balls take care of it...