Over the Transom in the SCOTUS Justice Search

2 years ago

0 Comments Say Something »

Text Size

Woman Up Editor

The Washington Post's Dan Eggen makes the point today that the battle of the interest groups will be a deeply lopsided fight in the run up to SCOTUS confirmation hearings because "Republicans are in the political wilderness."

Compared to 2006, when the now defunct Progress for America had $18 million to support the John Roberts and Samuel Alito nominations, there is only "a smattering of opposition groups to make the conservative case against whomever President Obama chooses."

During the 1991 Clarence Thomas confirmation, the folksy Wyoming Republican Alan Simpson described the anonymous unsolicited outpouring of scorn that had arrived in his Judiciary Committee office regarding hearing witness Anita Hill, "I've got letters hanging out of my pocket. I've got faxes. I've got statements from her former law professors, statements from people that know her, statements from Tulsa, Okla., saying, 'Watch out for this woman.'"

I guess the current characterizations of Sonia Sotomayor as dumb (spoofed on Letterman!), LGBT speculation, and general diversity bashing of various female candidates is emanating from some spontaneous, agenda-less force, kinda like what Senator Simpson once called "over the transom."

Filed Under: Supreme Court, Woman Up

Tagged: Alan Simpson, AlanSimpson, gender bashing, GenderBashing, sonia sotomayor, SoniaSotomayor, special interest group, SpecialInterestGroup, supreme court, supreme court justice, SupremeCourt, SupremeCourtJustice

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.