Well this is no surprise - science proves that female brains are at least 12% smaller than males and more than half the women in this country are on welfare. They're right at home with the rest of the degenerates in the Democrap party. They should enjoy their exploitation of working White males while they can, because after the dollar collapses, there will be no one left for them to live off of.

To the contrary studies show that women are smarter than men, we mature fastera and we live longer. Just because you are disgruntled doesn't mean that you can distort facts to make a point. The real issue is that the women in this country are the ones who are making intelligent informed choices while the men are going with the old party line. But look whose being more successful!

Women have been 'falling in line' with the Democratic party for decades, and female candidates are tolerated as long as they shut up and do as they are told. If the Democratic party was so into women, why is the ERA still in limbo? Why did the DNC trash Hillary in order to stand by their man? Women have a long way to go to prove they can think for themselves, without the need for men to lead them. Which is why most are Democrats.

It's Obama's fault.

I don't know if I should vomit on my computer screen or laugh at what I see on it....


omg...its no wonder, women have been held back in this country, along with other minorities...


some of you are beyond confused...

These polls are done using democrats and not the general public. Everyone I know, democrats, republicans, and independents, are already sick of the tax and spend President and Congress we have now. We're all ready for REAL CHANGE. We didn't get it with this election!...False promises were given.

So sorry to remind you folks, but emotions control female thought process, if you don't believe this, pay attention to their 'common sense' when it comes to their kids--they don't have any. I don't want a woman in control of anything that has a direct effect on MY life, no offense to my female comrades. Women are definitely better at other things. If you consider their lust for money and power, along with the disadvantage of emotional distraction, a female in charge is a scary thought. Sorry, but to hear that women are 'just not into the GOP' says to me that they are just not into fairness and sensibility....go figure.

George, so with today's just 20% Reps remaining your plan is... uhh more of the lame same shoot the messenger stuff?

Women always vote in greater numbers since the 20th century allowed them to, per my Mom, PCL & Michelle's comments as well.

Here are some conservative Gallup scientific poll links verifying your extinction, not very curious George... http://www.sodahead.com/question/244874/answers/gallup-poll-shows-twenty-nine-democratic-states-with-only-five-republican-states-what-do-you-think/

President Obama's post 100 day 4/30-5/2/09 68% Job approval bests everyone since JFK: Both Bush's, Clinton, Regan, Carter, Nixon & LBJ! ttp://www.gallup.com/poll/118054/100-Days-Obama-Approval-Broad-Deep.aspx

President Obama's 2:1 Job approval today of 66% with 28% Disapproval ttp://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Job-Approval.aspx

President Obama Averages 63% Approval in His First Quarter besting both Bush's, Clinton & Regan! http://www.gallup.com/poll/117598/Obama-Averages-Approval-First-Quarter.aspx

From a broad perspective, Republicans face a huge deficit among Americans of all ages, While Dems enjoy the 2:1 Independent support of all ages!

At no single age does the percent Republican exceed the percent Democrat.

Still, the range of this Democratic advantage (% Democrat minus % Republican) is quite large, extending from an 18 percentage point Democratic advantage among those 21, 23, and 25, down to just a to 3-point edge among those 39, 43, and 69. http://www.gallup.com/poll/118285/Democrats-Best-Among-Generation-Baby-Boomers.aspx?CSTS=alert

Even if ONLY the GOP's Best Demographic of 39, 43 & 69 year old's voted, President Obama still Wins!

Especially in light of Murdoch's the WSJ 4/29/09 results proving just 13% 'Solid voting' Reps remain, plus the remaining 7% of 'Not very reliable voting Reps' LOL

So let's see now, first the new administration brings race into the political forefront...about 150 years worth of progress shot all to hell, now it's the gender gap. What's next?

US President Barack Obama's cap and trade proposal is in trouble with Democrats in Congress

US Democrats backing away from cap and trade

By Troy Media Monday, May 11, 2009
- Dr. Stephen Murgatroyd, Columnist, Troy Media Corporation

US President Barack Obama’s cap and trade proposal is in trouble with Democrats in Congress

The most recent Democratic deserter is the Chairman of the powerful Agriculture Committee, Colin Peterson (D: Minn). Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.) called cap-and-trade “the most significant revenue-generating proposal of our time.”

Even scientists like James Hansen and John Lovelock – the leading climate alarmists in the world – oppose the cap and trade legislation. In their view, the cap-and-trade approach is both “ineffectual” and “verging on a gigantic scam.”

Several technical analysis of the potential impact of the cap and trade legislation in the US suggest that a full implementation and adherence to the emissions restrictions provisions described in the Waxman-Markey Climate Bill would only result in setting back the projected rise in global temperatures by a few years - a scientifically meaningless prospect. But even this insignificant result assumes a reduction of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions of greater than 80%, as envisioned in the Waxman-Markey bill. If implemented, cap and trade would produce a global temperature “savings,” during the next 50 years, of about 0.05ºC, assuming India and China also started to cut emissions.

Senator Jim Inhofe – the Senate’s resident climate change skeptic, believes that the cap and trade will raise $400 billion for the US treasury, but also increase energy costs for each family by approximately. $3,000 a year and lead to some 800,000 job losses. Pointing out that the vote on this part of the Obama’s budget secured just 39 votes in the Senate – 60 are needed for the legislation to become law – Inhofe makes clear that he thinks that the cap and trade scheme is “dead in the water.”