I had been planning to write this anyway, but after seeing Lee Stranahan's video "Segregation" I wanted to wait to see if I could get a comment from the White House on this first.
President Obama's decision to block the release of detainee abuse photographs on the grounds that their release might endanger US troops is a controversial one but one with which I ultimately agree. However, it has also been pointed out that his failure to stop discharges of gay soldiers also carries some risk. I asked Press Secretary Robert Gibbs about it at today's briefing:
I didn't really expect Gibbs to say, "OK, Tommy, we'll do it if you think it's a good idea." I also didn't ask as a way to make the President the bad guy here.
While I wish the President would put an immediate stop to this, I recognize the political calculus here. A unilateral action now could hamper a more lasting legislative solution later. While the President has demonstrated superb instincts in the past on "keeping the powder dry," I think people are ready for this, and it is worth the political risk.
I mainly asked about it in hopes of re-framing this issue in the public conversation.
Gibbs' point is that the detainee photo issue has no legislative remedy, whereas the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy does. Unsaid, but also true, is the fact that the harm caused by the photos would be much more immediate and direct, hence the urgency.
In an interview before Super Bowl XLIV on Sunday, President Obama said he plans to convene a televised bipartisan summit to decide on a way forward for health care reform, the New York Times reports ....
Nearly two-thirds of Republicans believe that President Obama is a socialist, about four in 10 say he should be impeached, and a majority believe Sarah Palin is more qualified to lead the country,...
President Obama is not happy with the turn of events in the Bay State that have led to the possibility the Democrats could lose the Senate seat held by the late Ted Kennedy for more than 47 years,...
The army should fire all of the gays they would proably give the enemy a blow job, todays army is a joke.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-6)
HEYTHATSRIGHT
3:56AM May 16th 2009
wouldn't that effect your mother's paycheck?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
DIANA
11:24PM May 15th 2009
Excellent article and great performance today at the briefing! I know that I retweeted Lee Stranahan's video as soon as he posted it on Twitter today, but I also want to give him another shout-out by saying "well-done!" to him now.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (8)
kkkcarlin
11:41PM May 15th 2009
Gays in the ARM FORCES is a joke.They go against the bible and should not be allowed to serve. Its a conflict of interest.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-8)
Cube
11:33AM May 16th 2009
Did you hurt your brain when the doctor dropped you on your ass at birth?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
Cube
10:22PM May 16th 2009
Tommy Christopher Live Tonight On Unusable Signal With Cube! 11:00 PM EST
I think you are correct. The right used this issue to go after Bill Clinton in the early days of his administration. "Don't ask, don't tell" was a foolish policy, one Clinton was forced into and wanted to tackle much later in his Presidency. Obama knows it is still a political hot potato, although I think much has changed in this country regarding gay people since 1993. The issue for any new President is he knows he only has so much political clout and never knows how long that will last. I think Obama knows issue number 1 with most Americans is the economy. As to "don't ask, don't tell" he needs to listen to his military advisers closely on the issue and proceed from there.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (5)
Miss Woman
3:53AM May 16th 2009
Equal rights for black people only occurred when white people made other white people stop discrimination through the American judicial system.
Equal rights for gay people will only occur when straight people make other straight people stop discrimination through the American judicial system.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
webguyster
5:51AM May 16th 2009
There are so many gays in the military, that truth be told, the minority are the heterosexuals. Every man is gay at one point in his life, or has a man crush.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (2)
bob
9:20AM May 16th 2009
Your rationalization for waking up after a drunken night out with semen on your breath has nothing to do with whether or not Obama should make it a priority to put an end to the practice of discharging (no pun intended) gays from the military.
For the record, who cares? We've got an economy that's no where near bottoming out and we're worried about pictures of detainees and this issue?
6 months from now we're going to be praying for "problems" like this instead of the ones we'll be experiencing.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (3)
to bob the douche
4:23PM May 16th 2009
That ain't semen on his breath, douche! If there's any essence at all, it's of the female variety....not that it should matter.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
John
12:10PM May 18th 2009
to bob: You have referred to "semen-breath" more than once, bob. Fantasizing again? Did the aversion therapy not work? Still checking out guys in the locker room? Come on out of the closet, bob.
John in Philadelphia
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
Ruth
9:42AM May 16th 2009
What they should do this time is change the uniform code of military justice which is the actual law in question. It hasn't done any good this don't ask don't tell because it never changed the law that governs the military.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (2)
stpso726
10:02AM May 16th 2009
There are already Gays in the military and they serve proudly. Don't ask Don't tell is not a Presidential policy it is a law that the President has no authority to ignore. The constitution specifically allows for the Congress to pass laws and the President must enforce them. The military is held to a higher standard which is codified in the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The analogy of the gays to persons of color is flawed. People of color and of different races cannot control who they are, they are born black or white or Hispanic. It is and should have always been wrong to discriminate against someone because of their parent’s heritage. Homosexuality is a behavior, just like, insubordination, marital infidelity, drug use and driving while intoxicated; all of which are not suitable for military life and will result in a discharge. Furthermore Christians are prevented from openly discussing their beliefs in military life. The military is charged to protect and defend the US and cannot afford to allow every alternative life style to force it’s acceptance on others. If it is wrong for Christians it is wrong for homosexuals. Oh and by the way, homosexuality is a choice.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-4)
cumo01
10:43AM May 16th 2009
How would you know if it is a choice, unless you are gay. You are sadly mistaken. The choice is to live a lie and pretend.Be hard to satisfy your mate if your dick went limp everytime you look at her vagina. WHAT CHOICE?Get a clue and get educated. How many gay people do you know?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
twisterjoe
11:01AM May 16th 2009
LOL Homosexuality is a choice?!?! I love the rationale behind that, especially from what my church would call Pharisee Christians.They say that gays hate Christianity and God. Really folks, think about it! A straight man wakes up one morning and realizes he hates God and wants to annoy god, and thinks to himself,"I know what I will do! I'll go out and start giving BJs. And maybe even bend over. I don't care if it hurts, or the idea of a man's zipper that close to my face makes me sick, as long as it pisses God off and offends Christians, I am going to do it!" YUCK!!!!! LOL If it were a choice, you would puke before you could do more than a minute!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
S321Saint
10:03AM May 16th 2009
First, Gibbs is the president's mouthpiece. NOONE CARES what he thinks about anything. Gibbs should NEVER USE the word I when he talks. If the president doesnt have a stand on an issue (usually the ones his neoliberals handlers want him to do while everyone is watching), then Gibbs should say so. Second, the president didnt do anything hard by not releasing photos that could endanger our troops abroad, for one of the few times as president he did the right thing for the right reason. The only ones complaining are his neoliberal handlers. Third, Neoliberal handlers and liberal "reporters" who think gays in the military is a "civil right" is foolish and ignorant of public opinion and logic, but that is par for the course. In their weird world, logic, reason, honesty, integrity arent used... Fourth, for you non military idiots (most of the democrat party and neoliberals), the focus should be on having our military be the best trained, best equipped and best housed in the world. We dont need to be the biggest, just the best. If gay hairdressers want to join the military then they should learn to control themselves....
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-4)
David
10:49AM May 16th 2009
Just like the straight hairdressers should learn to control themselves. Up-do's onthe frontlines is against Christian doctrine!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
brigittepj
11:08AM May 16th 2009
Some people are so naive. Gays always have and always will serve in the military. The question is, in order to serve their country, should they be forced to live a lie in constant fear of losing their career? Put yourself in that place.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
thrdpstnrmy
11:49AM May 16th 2009
The larger question is not why gays should not be allowed in the military, but whey any gay person would WANT to serve in the military? America's armed forces serve as puppets for corrupt capitalist politicians who have destroyed the economy to weaken the masses, and are now making increasingly oppressive moves. Join us in taking back America and restoring our lost liberties!