Today, Christian Broadcasting's David Brody says "the Bibles were burned because the rules on the base say that all garbage is burned at the end of the day. But just asking here; if the U.S. Military seized a stack full of Korans, would they be burned? You think that might cause a little outrage in the Muslim world?"
The crux of the original story was the allegation that the soldiers were violating General Order 1, which forbids proselytizing. The Pentagon denies this, but when you've got video of a Chaplain urging his men to be bounty hunters for Jesus, that's a tough argument to make:
Still, did they have to burn them?I mean, it's not like with flags, is it? There doesn't seem to be a right way to destroy a Bible.
Brody's point is well taken. Couldn't the Army have sold the Bibles to a local bookstore?
While I am firmly in the camp that says religion has intruded too far into government (as evidenced by the brouhaha surrounding the President's speech at a merely tangentially religious institution), I also think religious texts ought to be respected, even if their owners don't always extend that respect to others.
Surely, there's a middle-ground between being soul-snipers for Christ and burning stacks of Bible?
In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.