WASHINGTON--When President Obama announced his nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court on Tuesday, the East Room of the White House was packed.
Besides Sotomayor's family members, White House staffers and Attorney General Eric Holder, there were others guests who were carefully selected by the White House.
Most of the chosen live in the Washington area. They were summoned with a hurried call at about 8 a.m. from a White House aide who told them to rush over for an important announcement sometime near 10 a.m. Some realized what was up, because news that Obama would pick Sotomayor, a federal appeals judge in New York, for the Supreme Court was all over the morning shows. The list of attendees, obtained by PoliticsDaily.com, is at the end of this post.
In all, the White House pulled together 62 leaders of organizations. When I read the list of attendees, provided by the White House Office of Public Engagement (the recently renamed Office of Public Liaison), the common thread jumped out.
Most of the groups will be counted on by the White House to rally their very different constituencies on behalf of Sotomayor. The White House leveraged the announcement by getting Sotomayor's chief defenders together.
Among those present were leaders of Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America, because abortion is always an issue when it comes to a Supreme Court nominee, as well as heavyweights from Democratic-allied (official or unofficial) ethnic, labor and religious organizations.
Another point of the invite was to let the White House folks pay their props to this very important network, and to start the process of sending out a unified set of messages about Sotomayor.
Shortly after the Sotomayor announcement, the White House tried to cement the message by distributing talking points in a memo headlined "TOPLINE POINTS ON SCOTUS ANNOUNCEMENT** Not for Distribution**"
Have you heard Sotomayor has more federal experience than any nominee in 100 years? It seems I heard it about 100 times just on Wednesday.
"If confirmed for the Supreme Court, Judge Sotomayor would bring more federal judicial experience to the Supreme Court than any justice in 100 years, and more overall judicial experience than anyone confirmed for the Court in the past 70 years."
The talking points are circulated to Democratic operatives, Democratic press secretaries, and Democrats known as "talkers" who are the regulars on talk shows.
To underline the message, the White House organized a set of briefing calls on Wednesday: 12:30 p.m. for "talkers;' then White House Senior Advisor David Axelrod briefed Democratic Senate press secretaries at 2 p.m., mainly to run through the talking points.
Later Wednesday afternoon, on another messaging front, the Obama team was activating the vast e-mail network accumulated during the presidential campaign to work grassroots and netroots for Sotomayor. The list is now managed by the Democratic National Committee under its "Organizing for America" department.
Obama, in an e-mail video, said:
" I am proud to announce my nominee for the next Justice of the United States Supreme Court: Judge Sonia Sotomayor.
This decision affects us all -- and so it must involve us all. I've recorded a special message to personally introduce Judge Sotomayor and explain why I'm so confident she will make an excellent Justice."
Get the message?
LEADERS OF OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS AT THE SOTOMAYOR ANNOUNCEMENT
SOURCE: The White House.
Alliance for Justice, Nan Aron
American Association of People with Disabilities, Andy Imparato
American Association for Justice, Linda Lipsen
American Bar Association, Tom Susman
AFL-CIO, John Sweeney
American Jewish Committee, Richard Foltin
Anti-Defamation League, Jess Hordes
Asian American Justice Center, Karen Narasaki
Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, Robert Bernstein
Business Forward, Jim Doyle
Business Roundtable, Larry Burton
Catholics United, James Salt
Change to Win, Anna Burger
Children's Defense Fund, Marian Wright Edelman
Church of God in Christ, Inc., Rev. Eugene Rivers
Citizens' Commission on Civil Rights, William Taylor
Common Purpose Project, Miti Sathe
Constitutional Accountability Center, Doug Kendall
Faith in Public Life, Jennifer Butler
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Greg Lukianoff
Gay and Lesbian Task Force, D'Arcy Kemnitz
Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, David Ferreira
Hispanic National Bar Association, Liz Lopez
Human Rights Campaign, Joe Solmonese
Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, Ralph Everett
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Barbara Arnwine
Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, Nancy Zirkin
Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, Wade Henderson
League of United Latin American Citizens, Brent Wilkes
NAACP, Ben Jealous
NAACP, Hilary Shelton
NAACP – LDF, John Payton
NAACP-LDF, Leslie Proll
National Action Network, Rev. Al Sharpton
National Association of Women Judges, Marie Komisar
National Association of Women Lawyers, Lisa Horowitz
National Black Chamber of Commerce, Harry Alford
National Center for Lesbian Rights, Elizabeth Seaton
National Coalition of Black Women, E. Faye Williams
National Congress of American Indians, Jacqueline Johnson
National Council of Jewish Women, Sammie Moshenberg
National Employment Law Project, Christine Owens
National Hispanic Leadership Agenda, Gabriela Lemus
National Jewish Democratic Council, Linda Berg
National LGBT Bar Association, D'Arcy Kemnitz
NOW, Kim Gandy
National Partnership for Women and Families, Judy Lichtman
National Policy Alliance, Linda Haithcox
NARAL, Nancy Keenan
National Small Business Association, Todd McCracken
National Urban League, Stephanie Jones
National Urban League and Black Leadership Forum, Marc Morial
National Women's Law Center, Marcia Greenberger
Native American Bar Association, Heather Thompson
People for the American Way, Marge Baker
Planned Parenthood, Laurie Rubiner
Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, Mark Pelavin
Lynn Sweet is a columnist at PoliticsDaily.com and writes the Daily FLOTUS blog on Michelle Obama. She is also Washington Bureau Chief of the Chicago Sun-Times.... more
Racisim is now being celebrated in the U.S. as long as it is the right kind of racism
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
kdavis0071
8:44AM May 28th 2009
YOUR RIGHT ON TARGET. REACE SEEMS TO BE ON OBAMA MINE. WE KNOW THAT HE IS DIVEDING THIS COUNTRY. THIS IS WHY GUNS ARE BEING SOLD LIKE NEVER BEFORE. I BELIVE THAIR WILL BE A WAR IN THE U.S. SOON.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (4)
alicekrm
8:58AM May 28th 2009
My husband and I listen to English shortwave broadcasts out of Europe. They say that Obama and his people want the Mexicans to breed with his people which will create a more intelligent race. Also, there is a good station right here in America on 7.415 MHz AM.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (2)
DAD THE GREAT ON
9:27AM May 28th 2009
Excellent !
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-6)
cutlassv8
9:34AM May 28th 2009
Why is the American Indian always left out of the bean picking process?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (4)
JOE
2:28PM May 28th 2009
Funny to me, but this is an apparent racially motivated move on Nobamas part. I have checked her history and she is faaaaar from qualified.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
JR
3:06PM May 28th 2009
drwds, you are absolutely right... the nomination of Judge Sotomayer is a big threat to the poor threatened class of white males.. As a member of that group, I personally am shakin in my boots !!!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
hockeydc
3:07PM May 28th 2009
There is no reason to select a judge with such bigoted views. This is the 21st Century. We should not tolerate bias and bigotry especially of one nominated to the highest court in the land. It's a sad day for America
RATE THIS COMMENT: (8)
fletch
7:24PM May 28th 2009
GET OVER IT!THE REBUBS CAN'T DO ANYTHING RIGHT. JUST KEEP OPENING ALL OF YOUR REP RACSISTS MOUTHS IT JUST MAKES YOU ALL LOOK VERY STUID AND IGNORANT HUMMMMM!!!!!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-8)
cjjanis
9:14AM May 29th 2009
So her comments to a room full of hispanic woman who came to talk about judging case's racism and sexism is racist? How so? Only when her comments are taken out of context do they remotely sound racist.
I find it very funny how Judge Altito could state in his hearings that his heritage and how his family came to America gives him a better view on judging some case's. Seems its fine for a white Italian to claim his heritage gives him some insight but not a hispanic woman?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
vasilfasista
8:37AM May 28th 2009
People are important , but more important are the freedom to judge and the adjustment and adaptation of USA legal system to the international laws , so a court to can get involved into a international crimes properly..Todays legal proceeding is a parody of a law , and trial is a fars and maskarade.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
jca3005
11:41AM May 28th 2009
What the hell are you talking about?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (8)
pastorrickfbc
12:03PM May 28th 2009
Oh my. Are you for real. Our Nation is and must remain a Soviergn Nation. Our laws are our laws and never are they to be compromised or even influenced by an outside jurisdiction. My fore fathers sacrificed and faught for this land and people like you are not going to take it away! If you like another country better-then go there. This is America and America belongs to the people and the people say we are a Soviergn Nation. Period!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
jeff
1:46PM May 28th 2009
ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND. THE LAST THING THE USA NEEDS IS SOME OTHER COUNTRY TELLING US WHAT TO DO. THAT WAS THE VERY REASON THIS COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED. YOU SHOULD GO BACK TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA AND ONLY THE USA.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (8)
keith
8:47AM May 28th 2009
OBAMA does it again. Cant he find anyone who belives in the law and not go on feelings.? I think his favoret soung should be feelings. Well the u.s. is going to hell so, I guest she woulden,t make a differance.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
jan
12:43PM May 28th 2009
This sounds like a direct quote from Limbaugh. Obama isn't going 'on feelings'. Rush & buddies lifted one of a long list of attributes which Obama was looking for in a judge and ran with it...totally ignoring those such as comprehension of and adherence to Constitutional ideals, breadth and depth of experience, a comprehensive grounding in American values, and education. Not warm fuzziness. Why doesn't Rush's blatant dishonesty bother anyone? Do you never look at the entire picture? It would seem to be Rush and Sean who do nothing but emote and stir up anger.
How is the US 'going to hell'? Specifically? Weren't we in trouble at the end of the last administration, what with an overstretched military, an economy in the tank, etc.? Or are we ignoring that? What would you do differently?
I fervently hope the moderate Republicans will speak up more, continue speaking with calm reason and civility and not the emotional drama now being used to rile easily swayed Americans.
We all believe in sovereignty - even other nations. NO ONE wants to cede that. I wonder why that hasn't occurred to those beset by paranoia.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-6)
cashman7323
8:40AM May 28th 2009
Obama was going to nominate a liberal douche. We all knew that. Luckily, he decided on a quota filler who will have zero influence on the court. She is a big mouth bully with poor writing skills and a tendency to avoid logic in reaching her decisions. Bascially what we have here is a scullery maid for Ruth. Give her a few black eyes and let her though with the nation being made aware that the racist regime made a mediocre racist pick.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
thecashman2u
9:42AM May 28th 2009
Hey........our screen names have a certain commonality, don't they? I agree with your comments on the feminazi! Obama is everything that Rush, Sean, Neal and Michael have said about him on the radio for the last 2 years! America.......WAKE UP! This idiot we have in the White House is most certainly a Facist (Hitler) if not an outright Marxist (Stalin)!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (2)
repukeslie7
10:58AM May 28th 2009
For those of us who are truly liberal thinkers, Judge Sotomayor is far too moderate. I cannot believe you rePUKEs aren't jumping up and down with joy at President Obama's selection. I guess you racists cannot get past the fact that she is not a man or White. I hope his next pick is more liberal.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-10)
cashman7323
11:06AM May 28th 2009
Funny how we aren't racists when we support Thomas or Gonzalez, but we are if we question the motivation and judicial philosophy of Sotomayor. Democrat race baiters keep crying wolf and soon the muddle-headed undecided voters who really decide elections will see them for what they are.