"Racist"? Please identify by specific citation what she has said or done that was racist?

"Traitor"? Please identify what specific evidence there is of treasonous action by Sotomayor?

Pathetic, cowardly, bigot, hiding behind a fake name, do you think people don't see through your?

Since no one else will, I'll answer your question. She's a racist bigot because of her statement in front of UC Berkeley where she was quoted and recorded as saying that an older Latino woman would make better choices and be a better judge than an older white man because of her experiences in life. Now I ask you, if a white man was nominated for the Supreme Court and said a white man can make better choices and be a better judge than a Latino woman because of his life experience, do you truly believe that he wouldn't be dismissed immediately by both Congress as well as the American public? Why should she be treated any differently? Racism is racism, and it's wrong no matter how it is applied.
She also has no idea (or has a very incorrect view) of how our government was formed and its responisibilites. According to our Constitution, the Legislative branch creates policy and laws, and the Judicial branch interprets the Constitution and it's applicability toward lawsuits. According to her, in 2005, she was quoted and recorded as saying that the Appeals Courts are where policies and laws are made (she goes on to say that, "I know this is being taped and I shouldn't say it but it's the truth". She is supposed to sit on our highest court and determine the constitutionality of cases when she doesn't even understand her own responsibilities and what limitations are set forth by the Constitution upon the Legislative branch. So why should she be sitting up there? She is a racist, a bigot, and she has no clue what her responsibilities/limitations are as a judge.

Just another racial bigot that can't beleive their party lost the election.

huh? A traitor? What are you talking about?

Sototmayor, member of La Raza - Meaning "the Race," La Raza also has connections to groups that advocate the separation of several southwestern states from the rest of America. (Treason)


- Well, considering republicans such as David Duke belong to White Supremacy groups and the Governor of Texas has talked recently of Texas fleeing the Union.. and some 25% of Republicans polled recently thought secession a good idea... I guess there is not much difference between Republican beliefs and those of La Raza, huh.

I must admit, as much as I enjoy the Republican leadership, and their followers such as yourself, bringing the inherent racism that is apparently inside most republicans of low educational standards into the clear light of day, I am embarrassed at how bad they make America look to the rest of the world, adding substantially to the damage already done by the same republicans during the last 8 years.

To be honest, maybe it is time to let Texas go.. and let you folks go become Texans. America would be better off.

By the way, if you had the brains to actually read what she has said.. you'd realize immediately that you are the bigot.

Well answered.

How was that well answered? You compare a nominee to the Supreme Court to some forgotten politician like David Duke? How relevant is he? As for Texas sucession thats nothing new. Heck some of them feel they never stopped fighting the Civil War and are still independent. The fact of the matter is that her affiliations are questionable and should be issues addressed in her confirmation hearing.
As for a racist how about her siding with New Haven when they threw out a perfectly good a viable fire fighters test because too many whites and not enough minorities passed. Is that not racism toward the white fire fighters who actually put their nose to the books and studied? What message of equality is sent by withholding employment/advancement from one race because the others were too dumb or lazy to pass?
As for messages sent. What message does she send when making the statement that latino women are better suited for a supreme court appointment then a white man. No matter the context that is a bigotted and racist remark.
Just because you like the president doesn't mean every choice he makes will be correct. He is human too. All too many of you liberal thinking people are making the same mistake the neo cons made when George Treason Bush was in office. You are fighting anything that even sounds like an attack on Obama. That destroys your credibility just like those neo cons you were so upset with just a year ago. Think before you speak and you may just come out of it looking good rather then like a brainwashed cheerleader.

wgd351
4:04PM May 29th 2009
How was that well answered? You compare a nominee to the Supreme Court to some forgotten politician like David Duke? How relevant is he? As for Texas sucession thats nothing new. Heck some of them feel they never stopped fighting the Civil War and are still independent. The fact of the matter is that her affiliations are questionable and should be issues addressed in her confirmation hearing.
As for a racist how about her siding with New Haven when they threw out a perfectly good a viable fire fighters test because too many whites and not enough minorities passed. Is that not racism toward the white fire fighters who actually put their nose to the books and studied? What message of equality is sent by withholding employment/advancement from one race because the others were too dumb or lazy to pass?
As for messages sent. What message does she send when making the statement that latino women are better suited for a supreme court appointment then a white man. No matter the context that is a bigotted and racist remark.
Just because you like the president doesn't mean every choice he makes will be correct. He is human too. All too many of you liberal thinking people are making the same mistake the neo cons made when George Treason Bush was in office. You are fighting anything that even sounds like an attack on Obama. That destroys your credibility just like those neo cons you were so upset with just a year ago. Think before you speak and you may just come out of it looking good rather then like a brainwashed cheerleader.

==============================
If your David Duke is forgotten... how come Limbaugh is talking about him?

News results for david duke
Limbaugh: Nominating Sotomayor Like Nominating David Duke‎ - 2 hours ago
That's what would be asked if somebody were foolish enough to nominate David Duke or pick somebody even less offensive. It is asked.
AlterNet - 5 related articles »


============
#
The Official Website of Representative David Duke, PhD
Dr. David Duke is doing everything he can to save our heritage. He literally puts his time, his freedom and his personal safety on the line every day on ...
www.duke.org/ - 101k - Cached - Similar pages
#
David Duke, Former KKK Leader, Detained In Prague
PRAGUE — Former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke was detained by police in the Czech Republic on Friday on suspicion of denying the Holocaust.
www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/24/david-duke-former-kkk-lea_n_191234.html - 165k - Cached - Similar pages
#
Post-racial
David Duke was on the phone, talking about Barack Obama. ... Sure, we may not see David Duke strolling around with The Audacity of Hope under his arm any ...
www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=907272c4-54db-4fba-9149-e95b7293d6a0 - 52k - Cached - Similar pages
#
David Duke
David Duke is probably America's most famous unapologetic racist and anti-Semite. "Our clear goal," he has said, "must be the advancement of the white race ...
www.nndb.com/people/210/000024138/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages

My favorite part was where you quantified your arguments.

Or... hmm, it seems that never happened.

Garbage, then!

Ignored here is the fact that for 170 years white men were not either perceptive enough to understand that equal protection applied to ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS or they were just plain racist. It took a Black Lawyer to convince 9 white men all decent and true to see the question of separate but equal and how it effected the lives that they had no perception of. To state that real life perceptions don't make a difference is just plain silly. In Brown v Board of Education you have to believe that the Court was either filled with racists since it's inception or that the members just didn't understand the real; life effects of either slavery or segregation.

Please check your facts before you put your foot in your mouth. At Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's confirmation hearing he described his upbringing (son of immigrants, studying at Princeton and then Yale Law School - sound familiar?), concluding by saying:

"I have been shaped by the experiences of the people who are closest to me, by the things I've learned from Martha [his wife], by my hopes and my concerns for my children, Philip and Laura, by the experiences of members of my family, who are getting older, by my sister's experiences as a trial lawyer in a profession that has traditionally been dominated by men."

Later in those hearings he went on to say, "When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account."

Obviously, Justice Alito was not considered unqualified to serve on the Supreme Court.

Hey lilsister,
Everything identified in the article has been experience by white men of all ages and persuasions since the beginning of time. Just because you are black or a woman or both does not mean that white men have not been discriminated against for all the same reasons outlined in the article. It happens everyday. It is life. Don't expect a judge to make everything fair. It is not fair and never will be fair. No matter your race, gender or sexual perversion. Yes, I meant perversion.