In fact, the hands are many in the death of George Tiller, some more directly than others. Take Ann Coulter, for example. I watched her describe, to a church full of right-wing activists, abortion-clinic doctors and health care personnel who were murdered, as either having been shot, "...or, depending on your point of view, had a procedure performed on them with a rifle." And she's still out there today, spewing the same bile with violent force.
As you read this, the interweb is being scoured for clips of right-wing personalities to hang this on, all in service of...well, I'm not really sure. Are Coulter, O'Reilly, Terry, et al, supposed to begin weeping and preaching the pro-choice message of tolerance?
No, the implication here is stark, and not really an implication at all. Conservative pundits incited the murder of Dr. Tiller. It naturally follows, then, that they are guilty of criminal speech.
This is an argument of opportunity, and it reeks. If, for example, a similar fate had befallen then-President Bush, would Kos, et al, present themselves for summary arrest?
To be clear, I am not defending what O'Reilly and Coulter said, but rather their right to say it. Neither of them invented the "Abortion is murder" frame that is the bulwark of the "right to life" movement.
Coulter's remark, in particular, is an example of the kind of dark hyperbole that both sides routinely use to illustrate a point. A reasonable person could not conclude that she was diminishing the shooting of doctors, but rather illustrating how seriously some pro-lifers view abortions. To imply otherwise is dishonest.
While Kos and Co. similarly have the right to say what he wants, I don't think they're helping to cool the temperature of this conflict. Attempts to paint everyone who considers themselves "pro-life" as accessories to murder are necessarily counterproductive, especially when you consider how broad that segment really is.
I am unflinchingly pro-choice, and I believe that standing up for choice is crucial to being pro-woman. On the other hand, I grant others their differing point of view, and I'm glad we live in a country that allows women reproductive freedom.
Alienating people with relatively moderate positions on abortion does nothing to help keep it that way. Instead, we ought to realize that most people, on both sides of this question, argue passionately, but in good faith, and find the common ground that the President spoke of in denouncing and mourning this murder.
We bring together premium publishers and marketers of all sizes (including many of the world's leading brands) into the world's largest and most vibrant content marketplace. Learn more about Outbrain ›
The global audience reached by Outbrain each month*
The total recommendations we serve consumers monthly
Of the world’s leading brands use Outbrain
* Audience reach according to comScore, September 2014. Leading brands via Ad Age DataCenter / Kantar Media, 2014.
We selected Outbrain not only because the revenues were higher than others, but because its engine drives better recommendations than others.
Senior Vice President, Group General Manager
It's less about buying traffic than it is about reaching the right people with relevant headlines to get them to your content.
EVP and Senior Partner
Our goal is always to deliver content that adds value to the conversations being held by the end user. Outbrain allows us to do just that.
Global Manager of Digital Marketing
The fact that we’re able to drive these kinds of transactions with consumers at scale and with increasing efficiency has made Outbrain paramount to our marketing strategy.
You cannot leave it to chance that someone will find and engage with your content. Outbrain can put your content in the midst of the world’s most prestigious publications.
Having links to our content appearing directly on premium publisher sites helped us establish our brand.
Outbrain is one of those [critical] components helping us deliver the right messages to the right contingent at massive scale and in real time to counter a crisis.
We operate offices in 11 global territories and we partner with publishers and marketers in over 55 countries, including the U.S., UK, France, Brazil, India and Japan. Come join us ›
Our New Approach to Comments
In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.