Clove cigarettes are officially history. So are "light" cigarettes and your favorite Marlboro billboard next to KinderCare.
Monday in the Rose Garden, President Obama signed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, a bill that gives the Food and Drug Administration the responsibility to regulate tobacco products.
Before signing the bill, Obama said that tobacco-related illnesses are the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, and he detailed all the ways that kids get hooked on smokes before they turn 18. He ought to know, he said, because "I was one of these teenagers, so I know how difficult it can be to break this habit when it's been with you for a long time."
Is the prez still taking drags while nobody's looking? He wouldn't say, but he did say what's in the new law:
* FDA regulations will supersede weaker state laws, a major expansion of federal power; * The bill bans the words "light" or "mild" in tobacco advertising, as well as any words that give the impression that one cigarette is less dangerous than another; * It bans flavored tobacco products, like clove or cappuccino cigarettes (yes, they exist); * It requires companies to submit a complete list of ingredients in the tobacco, paper, filter and other components, and allows the FDA to require the removal of any additive it says is dangerous; * It requires this list of ingredients to be placed on all labels, which will itemize chemicals added to tobacco products; * It restricts tobacco marketing to children, such as tobacco billboards near schools.
Finally, the legislation applies to all tobacco products, not just cigarettes, and it passes all of the additional costs of new regulations back to the tobacco companies.
Before we consign the tobacco bill to history, however, let's take a quick look back at the House floor debate that gave us the words from Republican Steve Buyer of Indiana, never-before spoken in the history of Congress: "Go ahead and you smoke your lettuce!"
Patricia Murphy writes "The Capitolist" column for PoliticsDaily.com. She is the founder of Citizen Jane Politics, a non-partisan website for women... more
One step closer to full blown socialism. Anyone hear that off in the distance.......it's freedom slipping away. And no, I don't smoke.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (2)
E. Jones
12:40PM Jun 26th 2009
Like most Obama critics I've encountered, you obviously have no idea what the word 'socialism' even means. Regulating cigarettes has exactly NOTHING to do with socialism, and everything to do with putting the brakes on a runaway health crisis. Quit rooting for your team, and start thinking.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-8)
mitravelus
1:38PM Jun 26th 2009
while i agree with jones on the socialism response i disagree with him otherwise. the frustration caused by this bill is not about health issues its about telling americans what they can and cannot do, this includes destroying your lungs, but that is my choice to make no one elses. whether or not you agree that people should be smoking or not its not your choice and not your place either. i'm a smoker and i agree with turning the majority of places smoke-free and having raised insurance because of it, because that's my choice to make.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (19)
ba;ljkahsdflkjga
12:38AM Jul 20th 2009
Controlling the production of anything is a part of a socialist economy, A socialist economy controls the production, distribution, and marketing of products to be offered for dispersal in a socialist nation.
The government controlling ALL tobacco products is the DEFINITION of a centrally planned socialist economy.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (11)
racscal
8:20PM Aug 24th 2009
I agree.... and it has everything to do with sosialism! In about another year we wont be America Home of the Free!!!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
Alice
11:20PM Jun 22nd 2009
Flavored cigarettes and cigarette ads are not what get kids smoking. It's their parents and the other adults around them who set the example. If a child's parent(s) smokes, that child will most likely smoke at some point in their lives. If their parents are attentive, non-smokers who take up an active role in their child's life (this means actually paying attention to a kid rather than flipping on the T.V. or the computer and letting the media raise them), a child has much better chance to become a healthy, non-smoking adult. Also, why is tobacco being so heavily regulated and alcohol is still as easy to get as ever? America amazes me, and not always in a good way.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
lqdrowndedrat
10:23PM Sep 16th 2009
My parents have smoked my whole life. They were always very open about the mistakes they made, and neither my sister or I have ever thought about picking up a cigarette.
Many of my friends growing up with overly strict parents who didn't smoke lit up for the first time in middle school or early high school.
It's about parenting, yes, but just because parents made bad decisions doesn't mean their children will follow suit, or vice-versa.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
lordsoftheswords
12:35AM Jun 23rd 2009
This is retarded. It's time to stock up.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (23)
trigger435
12:36AM Jun 23rd 2009
Yet another instance of freedom being sacrificed in the name of saving individuals from themselves. A risk free environment cannot be legislated into existence. Even if it could be, a society where risk taking is prohibited or restricted is a society that is less than free. In normal circumstances, people spend the bulk of their lives as adults, not as children. Making laws that primarily restrict the liberty of adults in the name of protecting people who are only a few years away from legal adulthood demonstrates how far we have strayed from believing in the freedom and individualism that is so essential to the American spirit. It is unconscionable to stand idly by while the federal government continues to erode our liberty.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (20)
Alwayspissedoff@something
1:06AM Jun 23rd 2009
Nicely stated my freedom loving friend.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (10)
Bianca
2:08AM Jun 23rd 2009
Surely this doesn't apply to pipe tobacco, does it? Pipe tobacco is nothing without the flavor, I have to have my vanilla tobacco for my pipe! And no clove or "light" cigarettes? What is this? There is no way Americans will stand for this. You'd think history would have learned by now, making substances illegal just increases crime.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (19)
idlb
2:40PM Jun 23rd 2009
All they will do is change the word "Light" to something else. They won't be getting rid of the product.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (14)
Jack Colton
12:10AM Oct 20th 2009
I love Republicans. 1) This isn't just "Obama's new law," it was a bill that made it through your democratically elected Congress that he signed into law. That means they had their say in it all. 2) Where was your "this is socialism" claim in California when a Republican Governor signed a public smoking ban into law? I'm pretty sure that is pretty popular here in Cali. Double standard much? I didn't like Bush, but I didn't hate everything done under his tenure simply because he was involved.
Smoking accounts for a major part of health care costs in this country, more deaths than anything else, and is something that has to be dealt with for our health care system to ever have a chance of getting costs under control. You may say "this is my choice," but that mentality hasn't worked...and if this new law doesn't...it will ultimately be fixed.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
Athena Hollow
2:59AM Jun 23rd 2009
I am however glad to see that, however inadvertently, Buyer just pushed people to start buying electronic cigarettes :)
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-3)
Compton
4:43AM Jun 23rd 2009
lol who the hell smokes flavored cigarettes?
I didnt start due to the tobacco industries evil scheme, I started because Im an independent individual that made a semi stupid personal choice.
The anti tobacco lobby is just as corrupt as the tobacco industry.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (16)
timmmmmmmmmmer!
11:00AM Jun 26th 2009
Well Mr. Compton, if you happen to live in S. Central Los Angeles, you're smoking a Newport (a menthol flavored cigarette). I've never met a brother that didn't smoke menthol.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-6)
sparker1987
1:48PM Jun 23rd 2009
I can understand the ingredients list requirements and the authority of the FDA to remove anything it deems dangerous, I'm actually quite surprised that never got passed before. I am also very okay with limitting advertising of tobacco to near nothing, expect for store displays. As a smoker, we all have our specific brands anyways.
What i do not approve of is the ban of the words "lights" and "milds," anyone who isn't an idiot realises this refers to the flavor and not the "safeness" of the cigarette.
I am also quite appauled at the ban of clove cigarettes, i love smoking clove cigarettes, and i am well aware that they are probably worse for your health. I make conscious decisions to smoke what i smoke, cloves and Marb Menthols, i think this ban is absolutely rediculous, more asinine than the ban on marajuana, and i would really like to know why some anti-tobacco group wants to control what i put in my lungs.
I am all for keeping tobacco away from kids, if i ever have kids i would never want them smoking, but i don't want to take that option away from a grown adult that happens to enjoy smoking
RATE THIS COMMENT: (22)
for crying out loud
5:20PM Jun 23rd 2009
This is BS. I'm a grown ass man who is aware of the health risks, if I want to smoke clove cigarettes(or any non STRAIGHT UP TOBACCO products) that don't smell/taste like death then it shouldn't be any of the government's business.
Does this mean all hookah bars will be shut down as well?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (21)
themillermanman
9:39AM Jun 26th 2009
Rep. Buyer is a moron. Yes, smoke and tar are what causes cancer. However, within tobacco smoke is nicotine. Nicotine is addictive, what causes the user to inhale more smoke to get more nicotine. The circle continues until death or quitting (which the tobacco companies don't want you to do, so they add all the wonderful additives that increase addiction).
This bill is not banning tobacco or taking away the rights of people who choose to smoke. It's making sure that children aren't marketed to, and that there is regulation as to the listing ingredients of cigarettes and informing the public of the dangers. It's about information. If you're still stupid enough to smoke, don't say they didn't warn you.
In my opinion, there should be a tax on tobacco and alcohol such that it offsets the cost to Medicaid and Medicare and all other people required to pay for the health problems of smokers, alcoholics and other addicts. Maybe once cigarettes cost $15 a pack, people might read the warning and do something healthy.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-16)
Alwayspissedoff@something
4:38PM Jun 26th 2009
Miller, I don't think there's a debate over the health issues of smoking. We all get it. I believe the issues that most of these intelligent folks are stating is that it is up to each individal to choose whether he/she smokes. Fredom of choice. When freddom of choice begins to be sacrificed that is, are you listening E.Jones? "Socialism". Talk to a senior citizen some time and see what their views are. See how pissed and disgusted they are to see what they fought so hard for, go down the drain. America IS changing my friend and some of it, not for the good. Hold on to your freedoms.