Download the Politics Daily Toolbar
Our new toolbar integrates the latest news and analysis into your Web browser and installs in seconds. Download it now!

Politics DailyPolitics Daily

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • COLUMNISTS
  • TOPICS
  • THE CAPITOLIST
  • WOMAN UP
  • DAILY FLOTUS
  • JUST IN
  • THE CRAM
  • CONTACT
  • Inside Politics Daily

    The Coming Fight Over Religious Liberty

    Posted:
    06/30/09
    Filed Under:Religion, Culture
    Yesterday, President Obama spoke to gay leaders to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall riots in New York. The riots took place after a police raid on a gay nightclub in Greenwich Village, and are considered the start of the gay-rights movement in the United States.

    So far, the response to Obama's remarks seems a bit schizophrenic.
    Get the new
    PD toolbar!

    The Washington Blade -- a gay newspaper -- reported that "Lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans-gender leaders enthusiastically cheered President Obama and shouted 'I love you!,' " but others are frustrated over Obama's inaction over their agenda. For example, the New York Daily News reported that gay groups are upset over Obama's failure to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act and to repeal "Don't Ask Don't Tell."

    In an attempt to stay out of the culture wars -- as so many of his Democratic predecessors failed to do -- Obama is trying to pacify his liberal base with words, while avoiding any substantive changes that might upset traditional Americans who, after all, elected him in the belief that he was a transformational figure who could transcend the debates we've been having since the '60s.

    But while Obama is being politically sagacious (after all, he does have a car company to run and two wars to fight), it appears the gay rights movement is slowly gaining steam, as younger Americans show a more tolerant attitude toward homosexuality. And there is little doubt the intense political pressure from the left will ultimately force him to act on at least some of their agenda.

    In my estimation, so long as the debate is presented as a group seeking civil rights vs. a group attempting to deny civil rights, Americans who favor traditional values will continue to lose the argument. Of course, the debate is much more complex than that. There are many unintended consequences to consider.

    Just as the debate over Judge Sonia Sotomayor's decision in the Ricci firefighter case demonstrated, rights are often a zero sum game -- granting one group special rights limits those of another group. And in in this case, if gays win, religious liberty will take a hit.

    Consider, for example, the prospects of a church school that refuses to hire a transgendered teacher because doing so is counter to their theology. This could ultimately be viewed as discrimination, and, at the very least, open the school up to civil lawsuits -- some of them, perhaps, filed solely for political purposes. The school would either have to hire some transgendered teachers, or lie about it -- either way, it would be forced by the government to betray a tenet of its theology.

    Or how about a Baptist pastor who preaches against homosexuality, and refuses to conduct gay marriages in his church. The government may -- in its graciousness -- permit him to spew his "hate speech" -- but may also conclude that his church no longer qualifies as a non-profit organization. The power to tax is the power to destroy, as they say.

    This may sound extreme, but it is a very real possibility as the clash of opposing worldviews inevitably occurs. Of course, it is also the perfect thing for Obama to mock. I can hear him now, saying: "There are some who want you to think that by giving some gay folks their freedom, that next Sunday a gay guy will be teaching your Sunday school class. This is part of the old politics of division meant to score political points. But that's why we've created a waiver. So if you belong to a church that doesn't believe in homosexuality, why, your free to do that."

    Of course, the hope would be that issuing waivers to churches would defuse the issue of religious liberty. Aside from the question of who qualifies for a waiver, the natural problem is that this would merely be a temporary thing. Within a few years, of course, there would be attempts to overturn the waiver system. We would hear stories about how gay pastors are being discriminated against when they seek jobs.

    So long as the debate is portrayed as merely granting more freedom to more people, the American public will largely side with the homosexual lobby. In reality, however, passing laws that bar discrimination against gays -- especially laws regarding hiring -- will be tantamount to discriminating against traditional religious institutions. It may be that our society decides to go in that direction, but it should at least be discussed.


    Follow PoliticsDaily On Facebook and Twitter,
    and download the new Politics Daily toolbar!

    Matt Lewis

    Matt Lewis is a writer and commentator based in Alexandria, VA ... more

    Contact Matt Lewis

    subscribe to: RSS email: Matt Lewis
    • Happening Right Now

       

    Other News

     
    News Logo