I was away last week, in Cape Cod, where I indulged in my usual crazy-go-nuts Scrabble marathon, learned that I could live on lobster salad and want for nothing, and was reminded of the law of the universe that says if you sally forth in 70 SPF sunscreen and a shirt you wouldn't wear to the Safeway, you will run into your college boyfriend. If you are what you read, do I want to know what it means that hubby brought along a novel translated from the Swedish about a world in which women over 50 are recycled for parts -- I think Sarah Palin might have brought this to the beach this year also -- and a second one in which a divorcing couple goes on one last camping trip with fatal results? (The wife lives, though. I checked.) My own ink-on-paper companion was a Saul Alinsky bio published 20 years ago – and plenty pertinent today, since as noted all the way from here to here, Alinsky was an early role model for our community-organizer-in-chief in their always-exciting hometown of Chicago.
Even before Palin mocked Obama's days as an organizer in her Republican National Convention speech last summer, conservatives saw his tutelage in the rabble-rousing methods pioneered by Alinsky, who died when Obama was 11, as damning and therefore delightful: Of the – count em! -- 511 "official Obama administration scandals'' listed on ConservativeAmerican.org, one of top-rated outrages – Scandal #10, right ahead of Obama's connection to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright -- is "Obama Saul Alinsky Training Scandal.''
The "scandal'' in question is so measly it did make me wonder about the lesser-ranked trespasses -- # 510 is "Little Girl at Obama Town Hall comes from family of Obama Supporters!'' – but as laid out in a January '08 piece in American Thinker, the charge involving Alinsky is that "it must bother [Hillary Clinton] that Obama also appears to have mastered the playbook used by her own political teacher, the legendary amoral guru of left wing activism, Saul Alinksy. Hillary has met not only her match in Alinsky tactics, she has met the master of bloodless socialist revolution.'' As a young organizer, the piece goes on to explain, Obama must have "learned how to 'rub raw the sores of discontent,' in Alinsky's words...The agitator's job, according to Alinsky, is first to bring folks to the 'realization' that they are indeed miserable, that their misery is the fault of unresponsive governments or greedy corporations, then help them to bond together to demand what they deserve, and to make such an almighty stink that the dastardly governments and corporations will see imminent 'self-interest' in granting whatever it is that will cause the harassment to cease.''
Maybe that does sound a tad sinister, but when it comes to stink-stirring and rubbing raw, our cautious and conciliatory president is chopped liver to Rush Limbaugh's foie gras drizzled over a nice juicy Ruth's Chris steak tartare. Like Alinsky, Obama is an intensely pragmatic change agent of imprecise – or is it mutable? -- priorities. (And if you think Obama has been treated like The One, you should see some of Alinsky's press, like the 1940 editorial in the New York HeraldTribune that said if his work bringing people together to improve their own neighborhood in Chicago's notorious Back of the Yards meatpacking district could be replicated across the country "it may well mean the salvation of our way of life.'')
But Obama is also worlds more careful, and has way more faith in the political process than did the raucous and outrageous author of "Rules for Radicals." Alinsky enjoyed cozying up to Al Capone's gang for his research as a criminologist and reveled in attention-grabbing stunts like dumping a mountain of garbage in front of an establishment owned by a city official who'd been unresponsive to complaints about trash pick-up. (Alinsky's Rule #6: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.)
In both temperament and tactics, it's Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Matt Kibbe of Freedomworks who are channeling Alinksy these days. On Thursday, Limbaugh told his radio audience, "I am happy. I am honored. I am proud, ladies and gentlemen, to be considered the Mobfather here leading the unruly mobs protesting at all these town hall meetings.'' And how again did he whip them up? By just casually mentioning "my reaction to the Obama health care logo'' – even though there isn't one – "the other day. I mentioned something about it reminded me of Germany in 1942, the shape of the logo, the people. If you go and look at this you will find that the Obama health care logo is damn close to a Nazi swastika logo.'' (Alinsky's Rule #13: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.)
Over at Fox News, meanwhile, Sean Hannity is similarly taking a bow for the political theatre performed nightly at town halls across the country: "It's extraordinary,'' he said of the protests. "And the fact that we are – the audience out there is doing their job. They're going to those town-hall meetings of those politicians and they're confronting them. They're embarrassing them.'' (Alinsky's Rule # 5: Ridicule is man's most potent weapon.)
Between the guy who showed up at an Obama town hall in Portsmouth, N.H. with a loaded gun strapped to his thigh, the North Carolina congressman who received a health-care death threat and the Maryland representative hanged in effigy, the prospect of violence seems real enough. (Alinsky's Rule # 9: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.)
Yet it's harder than you might think to say how Alinsky himself would feel about all this – well, except for the swastika part; he was, after all, a Jew enraged by American complacency about the menace posed by Hitler. But as Alinsky's biographer Sanford Horwitt wrote in the fascinating "Let Them Call Me Rebel": "Throughout Alinsky's life there was confusion about where to place him and his concepts on the political spectrum, and more confusion than one would have expected of a man who had been a friend and supporter of the great labor leader John L. Lewis and the industrial labor movement in the 1930s, a self-professed radical in the 1940s, and an outspoken advocate of racial integration and civil rights in the 1950s and 1960s."
And what are we to think of his latest conservative heirs and imitators? As infuriating as their scare tactics are, and as desperately as we need health care reform, is it hypocritical for liberals to suddenly discover the dangers of fanning social discontent now that the grassroots are growing in conservative ground? Are tactics that were OK for Code Pink not OK for Freedomworks? For me, the bottom line is that in different ways, the latter-day Alinskys on both the left and the right are demonstrating not the strength but the weakness of his tactics – weakness that, as a matter of fact, Hillary Clinton pointed out in her Wellesley senior honors thesis on Alinsky; for one thing, she wrote, an awful lot hinged on his personal appeal.
My own first brush with community organizing was as a young lefty do-gooder who nonetheless shared some of Palin's skepticism about what the heck kind of work that was: Right after graduating from Notre Dame, as a Holy Cross Associate in San Francisco's Mission District, I worked in a nun-run program for women coming out of abusive relationships and shared a house with four other volunteers -- two women who taught low-income kids in a Catholic school, and two guys whose assignment was community organizing -- which to the untrained eye looked a lot like hanging out, speaking Spanish with the neighbors, and dreaming up topics for philosophical discussions the rest of us were too tired for at day's end.
In the years since then, I have seen organizers gain recognition of a problem, but never its solution: As a reporter for New York Newsday in the early '90s, I spent many Saturday mornings covering the marches Al Sharpton organized in Brooklyn's Bensonhurst after a young black guy, Yusuf Hawkins, was killed by a white mob there. Week after week, his group would march through the heavily Italian neighborhood shouting, "No justice, no peace.'' And week after week, residents would yell the ugliest racist invective you can imagine at the marchers. I would not say I was Sharpton's biggest fan – the Tawana Brawley hoax he was involved in was inexcusable – but he was making a point, provoking a reaction, forcing recognition that that was how things stood then and there, and there was no denying it.
Even the most effective such action I can remember – involving the "Brooks Brothers" protesters from D.C. who stormed the room where Miami-Dade election officials were working and got them to stop the Bush-Gore Florida recount in November of 2000 -- can't claim credit for Bush's victory. Gore didn't lose the White House because he got out-organized, though that was also true; he lost because he got out-lawyered. And Barack Obama certainly didn't become president because of ACORN, but in spite of it.
Today, the Code Pink ladies still shout anti-war slogans at hearings on the Hill – in seeming violation of Alinsky's Rule # 7: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. And the more enraged members of the mobs marching on town halls don't even seem to know what their goals are – to the point that their tactics are very likely to backfire.
Poor Craig Miller, who screamed in Sen. Arlen Specter's face before being ejected from a recent health care town hall in Lebanon, Pa., said later on MSNBC that he was yelling in order to be heard – but then, when accorded his 15 minutes on cable TV, had no idea what he wanted to say. ("I wanted to discuss how the president has broken his oath of office,'' he said, but then couldn't really explain further, other than to complain that Obama had appointed "31 czars'' – or heads of various government offices.) The much-interviewed Katy Abram, who'd quiveringly told Specter, "This is the dismantling of our country,'' and "You have awakened a sleeping giant,'' had a similarly hard time expressing her specific objections, either to health care reform or Obama policies in general. William Kostric, the man who brought a loaded gun with him to protest Obama's health care reform town hall in Portsmouth, told Chris Matthews on "Hardball" that his gripe not only went beyond the health care issue but beyond his entire lifetime, with a slide towards socialism that in his view began with the Wilson administration: "One party wants to take our money and bail out corporations, the other one wants to take our money and bail out welfare cases; neither party wants to listen to the people who believe they own our property and what we earn is ours.'' Not every foot soldier, of course, has to be a strategist. But the more irrational and out of control protesters are, and the more their organizers rant about imaginary "death panels," the more damage they do their case and their cause.
According to a USA Today/Gallup Poll released Wednesday, the angry mob tactic may be having some initial impact: 34 percent of respondents say the protests have made them more sympathetic to the protesters' views, compared to 21 percent of the 1,000 adults surveyed who are now less sympathetic. But in the end, I refuse to believe that the American public will conclude that the president they elected less than a year ago is lying when he says there are no death panels coming to liquidate grandma. I refuse to believe they will say no, they quite like the way they are treated by insurance companies and want to be able to hang on to coverage that can be cancelled mid-chemo. And while I too feel more and more sympathy for the protesters, it's not in a way either they or their organizers would like.
Hannity knew what he was talking about two years ago with Obama, now he is proven to be correct. Hannity is pretty good.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (2)
Wilson
2:15PM Aug 17th 2009
Truth is a very hard thing for Obama to do. I think that Palin is more truthful than any politican I have heard in a long time. Look how the far left has tried so hard to hurt her and her family. There was a guy on O'Riley show, hostessed by Laura Ingram on a Friday night a week ago (he worked on the Obama campaine) that was so ugly against Palin. I always thought that gay men were the nicest men on earth, they are always a gentleman and very polite. This one gay guy had his fangs out. And I am not saying it because he is gay but because he was ugly acting and all the gay men I have ever talked with is so nice.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (3)
jrotced02
12:11AM Aug 18th 2009
Palin more truthful? Are you out of your Vulcan mind? Aside from the numerous ethics violations she has been dodging, how about her fabricated credentials? Death panels? Is she serious, or terminally stupid.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
geomcd
2:16PM Aug 17th 2009
If this writer is trying to say something, why doesn't she just say it... I have no idea what she is writing about and after a couple of paragraphs, I frankly didn't care. Can't they find someone who can communicate? I guess two bachelor degrees and a master's just isn't enough.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (3)
ettu
2:25PM Aug 17th 2009
To Truth: Thank you for your well written response to Melinda. You have spoken eloquently for many of us. Melinda had ample time to develop her carefully worded commentary, delivered with the intent of deceiving and impressing those who read it. She writes with disdain about those who are asked to comment extemporaneously about complex issues and gut feelings. She could not do this, without having had time to write and re-write. Those opposing this tremendous intrusion of government into our private lives have not had years of training, days of preperation, teleprompters, etc., and still, they have made our Legislators take notice. These are the majority of Americans who have worked hard, followed the rules, took responsibility for themselves and their families, built this country, and now find that they are faced with what appears to be a total dismantling of all they believe in. She is an "elitist" far removed from mainstream America, and she will not hesitate to distort the truth as a means of persuading others to follow her Leftist tendencies. It takes a great deal of practice to be so misleading with the words they speak. The ordinary people have never had enough free time to develop this kind of expertise in deceit.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
almazstmp
5:36PM Aug 17th 2009
Just another liberal apologist trying to explain why their shiiiit doesn't smell.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (3)
big fat poopyhead
6:10PM Aug 17th 2009
You should revisit your understanding of socialism, it could use some work.
xxx
Let me begin by saying you are neurotic, not very smart and given to hasty conclusion . I'm sorry to begin ad hominem, but in light of your incapacity, I find it necessary to outline the playing field.
So I'm dumbing things down accordingly.
First, socialism: government ownership and distribution of wealth according to the whims of the state.
It differs from Marxism, but both generate a classless society, and endless class struggle in pure and applied forms.
I know a lot about socialism and social democracy, and their historical varieties in the last century and a half, and I have no problem arguing either that we ARE or ARE NOT a socialist state.
Like I said, it's just rhetoric designed to take extremely neurotic people in. Fools, if you will.
If your brain is more attuned to American Idol as I'd suspect, the republican party is just your political speed - .5 tortoise, approximately....
That's some of what I know. You, on the other hand know what some corporate pimp has fed you.
Here's one of your quotes:
we don't trust government to do ANYTHING efficiently,
xxxx
again, this is either your neurosis, your stupidity or you're lying.
You trust the American Soldier to do the best job possible. You trust the government to provide them with the best health care in existence.
This sort of just plain slipshod thinking runs through every post you write.
The rest of your post is gibbering idiocy. Don't waste my time if you can't actually outline an issue. I don't need to talk to dittoheads. Bring me your master.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
rfdz3
6:37PM Aug 17th 2009
Wow...could Ms Henneberger be just a bit more tedious and prolix? I kept reading and reading and hoping for the end and it just wouldn't scroll into view..."I thought I was gonna die!" (Roseanne Rosannadanna dixit)
Now that she vacations on Cape Cod, perhaps she hasn't internalized the Alinsky rule that tactics which go on too long are a drag...and so are blog posts.
She thinks the man who confronted Arlen Specter was inarticulate (why am I not surprised?); she thinks he didn't use his cable spot wisely to lay out a 5-point health care reform plan. He blurted something about "31 czars." And the woman who "quiveringly" complained about the "dismantling" of the country was similarly aphasic in Ms. Henneberger's view. And yet with those two sound bytes, they spoke volumes to millions and millions of ordinary citizens who understand a power grab when they see one...and the proposed HR 3200 is a political power grab of Gargantuan proportions.
That Ms. Hennerberger and her lefty ilk don't get it speaks volumes as well...and explains why with 90% of the public covered by medical insurance, and 80% satisfied with their plan, and solid majorities against Obama on this lurch toward government-directed health care, the Left is getting trounced.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (3)
weathwoods
7:30PM Aug 17th 2009
That yahoo in the picture is definitely a disciple of Rush "The Cysto Kid" Limbaugh. "Think for myself? Heck no! Ah let's Rush do that. Ditto, Rush. You said it, Rush." Town meetings, indeed. The writer and philosopher Ayn Rand said that we exist in our minds, which thought echoes the proposition of the French philosopher and mathematician Rene Descartes: Cogito ergo sum. (For Bushbots and fans of Limbaugh, that's Latin for, "I think, therefore I am.") If one believes lies, one is like a prisoner of war. If one refuses to free his mind, one is like a prisoner of war who refuses to try to escape. Bushbots and Limbaugh lemmings are moral cowards.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-3)
rajjda
9:49PM Aug 17th 2009
The president is drowning and you putting down normal Americans for not being well spoken pundits when they get on TV is down right insulting and disingenuous...
when the president can be specific then we can talk but as of now he threw the left wing of his party 'under the bus' - Nancy got stuck out there when Obama, smooth as silk, changes his mind...
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
rmhopper3
11:35PM Aug 17th 2009
I think people there are some people who are opposed to Obamas health care plan for practical reasons like costs but most are just silly Bible thumping wing nuts who faced with the undeniable fact that their guy and his guys were corrupt idiots who very nearly lost the war they started and destroyed the economy are pointing fingers and calling names mostly because they dont have anything to offer. They place their faith in the same greedy corporate morons who are resonnsible for economic crisis and incidentally a lot of the reason health care is so screwed. Really, all this paranoid raving about government death panels would be better suited to late night sci fi. None of you wing nuts seems overly worried about bean counting corporate HMO execs who make the same kind of decisions based next months bonus...Obama may not always have been right but at least he is doing something...Not just stupidly smiling and mangling the English language as he destroys the nation with inaction and hubris ...for the record the president has nothing to do with abortion policy and who cares ......economic regulation is good and only and the cowboys who stripped it down are partly responsible for the way things are.....and I am so sick of people who have no idea what a marxist is constantly using that word to describe anyone who doesnt suck the ass of every corporation that makes a campaign contribution
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
longwalker
11:37PM Aug 17th 2009
Melinda Henneburger : As the poet said "You are entitled to your own opinion but not to your own facts." Your "Brooks Brothers" comment shows that you have no idea of the facts and circumstances concerning that incident in Florida. The "Brooks Brothers" crowd were not trying to stop the re-count as you stated. In violation of Florida law, the poll officials went into a seperate room to conduct the re-count. That room did not allow for poll watchers to come in and observe the re-count. The "Brook Brothers" types were protesting the fact that the re-count would be done without adequate supervision. Shades of Daley's Chicago!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
big fat poopyhead
12:09AM Aug 18th 2009
. The "Brooks Brothers" crowd were not trying to stop the re-count as you stated
xxx
they most certainly were and they were sent there to do precisely that job. That's not even disputed anymore. Why lose that argument yet again?
If you want to know about your world, you have to stop believing corporate pimps who want your money, or stop being one.
They used the same brown shirt tactics being employed today and we all saw it on live television. over and over and over again.
Talk about orchestration! they already had their 'sore loserman' signs printed up from the first moment!
The only people that fools are abysmally stupid, neurotic or extremely gullible in any mix you choose.
You're lying about poll watchers doing the recount too, and if the truth be told, Boies' argument before the Fla SC should have been decided by summary judgment since closing the recount the way Harris did it was a violation of statute.
The SC had NO jurisdiction and their justification of action is probably the worst in the history of American jurisprudence, scalia saying it would be a 'hardship on Bush'.
No, that's not politics, that institutionalized stupidity, and it taints the entire corporatist movement.
It's hard to respect corporatists since their objectives include destruction of America and outsourcing it to foreign corporations who regard us as an exploitable natural resource. They have an entire political party of Judases to git 'er done, too, and I'd say you are one of them.
sign the petition to boycott advertisers of the Glenn Beck TV show
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
jrotced02
11:18AM Aug 18th 2009
No wonder Dick(less) Morris has an axe to grind against President Obama. Like most of the other harers, they can't get laid.
On August 29, 1996, Morris resigned from the Clinton campaign after reports surfaced that he had been involved with a prostitute. A New York tabloid newspaper, the Star, had obtained and published a set of photographs of Morris and the woman on a Washington, D.C., hotel balcony. News of the impending publication broke during the third day of the 1996 Democratic Convention. The Electronic Telegraph reported unverified claims that in order to impress the woman, S. Rowlands, Morris invited her to listen in on his conversations with President Clinton. There were also stories of foot fetishism and sexual roleplay between Morris and Rowlands, specifically that Morris had proclivities for toe-sucking and regaling Ms. Rowlands with a rendition of "Popeye the Sailor Man" while clad in boxer shorts..[7][8][9]
Morris resigned on the same day that Bill Clinton spoke and accepted the nomination at the Democratic National Convention. In his resignation statement, he said that "while I served I sought to avoid the limelight because I did not want to become the message. Now, I resign so I will not become the issue."[10] In his response, President Clinton praised Morris as a "friend", and thanked him for his years of service. Privately various aides to Clinton were furious that in his resignation statement Morris credited himself with helping the President "come back from being buried in a landslide" and that Morris ended by comparing himself to Robert Kennedy.[11]
Morris was featured on two consecutive covers of Time magazine. The September 2, 1996 issue, which was released before the prostitute story broke, featured Morris as "The Man Who Has Clinton's Ear."[1] The following week, the cover featured Morris and his wife, Eileen McGann, and the headline read "The Morris Mess: After the Fall."[11]
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
Ben
11:22AM Aug 18th 2009
Until the media told me how wonderful Saul Alinsky was, I only knew what I read about him from the history books - he was a radical socialist revolutionary who prompted his disciples to adopt Leninist, bolshevik, tactics in order to usurp power. Its good though that the media tells me what I need to know about a topic so I can form their opinion. thats why Fox news, with its evil presentation of both sides of an issue, is so dangerous. Undirected thoughts lead to opinions which are dangerous to the regime. cant have that. I mean, its like glorious socialist father Stalin said (after he murdered another even 10 million people) "ideas are more dangerous than guns. we would not allow our opponents to have guns, why would we let them have ideas." thank you, Alinsky, father Stalin, and lord savior Obomo for correcting our mistaken thoughts.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (2)
jrotced02
4:32PM Aug 18th 2009
No chit Sherlock! When will people stop grabbing their ankles for the insurance companes?
The health care reform compromise that centrist Democrats and several Republicans have indicated they'd support has shown an inability to effectively lower premiums for consumers, a newly resurfaced government study shows. In recent days, a slew of lawmakers, notably Sens. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), have begun a renewed push to establish health care insurance cooperatives as an alternative to a publicly run insurance plan.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
Dave
1:11PM Aug 19th 2009
Rush Limbaugh is full of crap. If he knows so much about politics then why does he not run for President. Let him see how it really is to gets your policies passed thru the House & Senate.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
abdd32
6:34PM Aug 19th 2009
Now let me see. If I understand those opposing health care reform, everything would be great "If we didn't have that black man as President." These people want us back to segregation days when the only black to see the inside of the White House was a black servant. And the constitution they so worship is one in which only white,fundamentalist MEN could vote. The US has always had a lunatic fringe lead by crazy fundamentalist preachers. It was ever thus...and unfortunately, may be the future(turn-back).