Kennedy Memoir Already a Bestseller Even Before September Release

Maybe we will finally find out what happened that night on Chappaquiddick Island.

It would be a national disgrace to bury this guy at Arlington National Cmetery. They should bury him at sea off Chappaquiddick Island.

"Strike while the iron is hot", they always say. This poor bastard is'nt even cold yet and the leeches are already looking for a bare spot. Maggots are maggots, no matter which can they reside in.

READ BELOW AND TELL ME THAT "TEDDY BOY" WASN'T A DIRT BAG. WHILE OTHER YOUNG MEN WERE DYING IN KOREA HIS WHORE MASTER FATHER HAD HIM SENT TO PARIS....AND THE DEMOCRAT'S HAD THE NERVE TO GIVE GEORGE BUSH GRIEF OVER HIS MILITARY SERVICE!!

Kennedy earned C grades at the private Milton Academy, but was admitted to Harvard as a "legacy" -- his father and older brothers had attended there, so the younger and dimmer Kennedy's admission was virtually assured. While attending, he was expelled twice, once for cheating on a test, and once for paying a classmate to cheat for him. While expelled, Kennedy enlisted in the Army, but mistakenly signed up for four years instead of two. His father, Joseph P. Kennedy, former U.S. Ambassador to England, pulled the necessary strings to have his enlistment shortened to two years, and to ensure that he served in Europe, not Korea, where a war was raging. Kennedy was assigned to Paris, never advanced beyond the rank of Private, and returned to Harvard upon being discharged."

IN ADDITION TO BEING A MURDERER AND A CHARLATAN, TED KENNEDY WAS A TRAITOR TO THIS NATION AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN DRAWN AND QUARTERED AND HIS GUTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN LAID OUT TO DRY IN THE SUN AND TO BE EATEN BY MAGGOTS.

TO WIT:
Appendix
TEXT OF KGB LETTER ON SENATOR TED KENNEDY
_________________________________________

Special Importance
Committee on State Security of the USSR
14.05. 1983 No. 1029 Ch/OV
Moscow

Regarding Senator Kennedy’s request to the General Secretary of the Communist Party Comrade Y.V. Andropov

Comrade Y.V. Andropov

On 9-10 May of this year, Senator Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant J. Tunney was in Moscow. The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Center Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.

Senator Kennedy, like other rational people, is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations. Events are developing such that this relationship coupled with the general state of global affairs will make the situation even more dangerous. The main reason for this is Reagan’s belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe.

According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President’s refusal to engage any modification on his politics. He feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvement of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity. For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline. The White House has portrayed this in the media as the “success of Reaganomics.”

Naturally, not everything in the province of economics has gone according to Reagan’s plan. A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the north-eastern states, foresee certain hidden tendencies that many bring about a new economic crisis in the USA. This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign of 1984, which would benefit the Democratic party. Nevertheless, there are no secure assurances this will indeed develop.

The only real threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations. These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign. The movement advocating a freeze on nuclear arsenals of both countries continues to gain strength in the United States. The movement is also willing to accept preparations, particularly from Kennedy, for its continued growth. In political and influential circles of the country, including within Congress, the resistence to growing military expenditures is gaining strength.

However, according to Kennedy, the opposition to Reagan is still very weak. Reagan’s adversaries are divided and the presentations they make are not fully effective. Meanwhile, Reagan has the capabilities to effectively counter any propaganda. In order to neutralize criticism that the talks between the USA and the USSR are non-constructive, Reagan will grandiose, but subjectively propagandistic. At the same time, Soviet officials who speak about disarmament will be quoted out of context, silenced or groundlessly and whimsically discounted. Although arguments and statements by officials of the USSR do appear in the press, it is important to note the majority of Americans do not read serious newspapers or periodicals.

Kennedy believes that, given the current state of affairs, and in the interest of peace, it would be prudent and timely to undertake the following steps to counter the militaristic politics of Reagan and his campaign to psychologically burden the American people. In this regard, he offers the following proposals to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Y.V. Andropov:

1. Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA. He would also like to inform you that he has planned a trip through Western Europe, where he anticipates meeting England’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and French President Mitterand in which he will exchange similar ideas regarding the same issues.

If his proposals would be accepted in principle, Kennedy would send his representative to Moscow to resolve questions regarding organizing such a visit.

Kennedy thinks the benefits of a meeting with Y.V.Andropov will be enhanced if he could also invite one of the well known Republican senators, for example, Mark Hatfield. Such a meeting will have a strong impact on American and political circles in the USA (In March of 1982, Hatfield and Kennedy proposed a project to freeze the nuclear arsenals of the USA and USSR and pblished a book on the theme as well.)

2. Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with Y.V. Andropov in the USA. A direct appeal by the General Secretary to the American people will, without a doubt, attact a great deal of attention and interest in the country. The senator is convinced this would receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method of mass media and information.

If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interview. Specifically, the president of the board of directors of ABC, Elton Raul and television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow. The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.

Furthermore, with the same purpose in mind, a series of televised interviews in the USA with lower level Soviet officials, particularly from the military would be organized. They would also have an opportunity to appeal directly to the American people about the peaceful intentions of the USSR, with their own arguments about maintaining a true balance of power between the USSR and the USA in military term. This issue is quickly being distorted by Reagan’s administration.

Kennedy asked to convey that this appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union is his effort to contribute a strong proposal that would root out the threat of nuclear war, and to improve Soviet-American relations, so that they define the safety of the world. Kennedy is very impressed with the activities of Y.V. Andropov and other Soviet leaders, who expressed their commitment to heal international affairs, and improve mutal understandings between peoples.

The senator underscored that he eagerly awaits a reply to his appeal, the answer to which may be delivered through Tunney.

Having conveyed Kennedy’s appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Tunney also explained that Senator Kennedy has in the last few years actively made appearances to reduce the threat of war. Because he formally refused to partake in the election campaign of 1984, his speeches would be taken without prejudice as they are not tied to any campaign promises. Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988. At that time, he will be 56 and his personal problems, which could hinder his standing, will be resolved (Kennedy has just completed a divorce and plans to remarry in the near future). Taken together, Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic Party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president. This would explain why he is convinced that none of the candidates today have a real chance at defeating Reagan.

We await instructions.

President of the committee
V. Chebrikov

Of course Ted Kennedy has always been the willing stooge of any enemy of this country.

But it is fitting that we should remember this perfidy at the close of 2006. May it strengthen our country’s resolve to try to prevent — or at least expose — his and others’ sedition in the future.

With Congress back in the control of the Democrats, we will be kept very busy.

Hey Emily, Still obsessing about Teddy?? "He was just a man", DONT YOU THINK?? You dont have to take cheap shots today, your loyal following of IDIOTS have already made their usual sophmoric, asinine comments. 8 million for his book? Wonder what one of your books will fetch, if you ever have something INTERESTING to write about...

emily, you seem to be turning rather smarmy. You bias is showing as well as your lack of decorum. When you die what do you think will be said and felt about you? Will anyone mourn, I think not.

amadubuko
6:05PM Aug 29th 2009
Judge not, for the same measure you judge it shall be measured back to you.
In life everybody makes mistakes, but it should not be what defines who we are
-----------------------------------

No. A mistake of forgetting to carry the one in a math problem. A mistake is going left instead of right while driving. A mistake if referring to 'Bob' as 'Steve'. Leaving someone to die so you can save your political hide goes well beyond the definition of mistake regardless of the dictionary you cite.

No doubt the book will be a big seller, the publisher will recoup its investment, and the effort to whitewash this man's legacy will continue, aided by a media culture that has yet to realize liberalism has failed in every nation that has tried it. No doubt, either, that the book will be entertaining - anyone spending that long a time in Washington must have some good stories to tell - but I do wonder whether some introspection will be included.

Will there be material re: Kopechne? Any remorse over the effort to publicly ruin Robert Bork or Clarence Thomas? Any thoughts about the recklessness that defined the bulk of his life? Just curious.

Its got be rated R or X for sure.

Dearly beloved brethren of pure and righteous right, let us gather round the trespasser's grave, contemplate our smugness, solemnly take our neighbor in hand and fondly think of what jesus would do as we partake in the sacred comfort of Circle Jerk.

I can almost hear the lord and savior now saying, WHAT?? Oh, yeshua freakin' ha nozri!

Did they at least close the coffin first?