COMBAT OUTPOST ZORMAT, Eastern Afghanistan -- Just about the time the laughter here was dying down, U.S. Sens. Carl Levin and Jack Reed were touching down in Kabul for a whirlwind, suit-and-tie "fact-finding'' tour of the war zone. That was hundreds of miles from this remote U.S. Army base, home to a small, well-armed contingent of soldiers from the 1st Squadron, 40th Cavalry Regiment COP Zormat that was under the onslaught of a slashing evening rainstorm. Turret gunners on the gun trucks returning from patrol were soaked and shivering. The rain beat against the plywood walls of the "permanent'' buildings here while tent roofs sagged and dripped and soldiers wearing headlamps (the COP is blacked out at night) splashed through mud. Cardboard cartons of supplies slowly collapsed in puddles.
Get the new
PD toolbar!Inside, I had set off the guffawing and hooting myself. I hadn't meant to: I just asked the specialists and sergeants in the Tactical Operations Center whether anyone from Congress had ever dropped in to see how things were going. Normally the TOC is a serious and tense place where combat patrols and attacks are monitored. Mention of a congressional visit caused an outbreak of raucous levity, of which "Yeah, right!'' is a printable version.
I don't mean to pick on Carl Levin and Jack Reed, Democrats from Michigan and Rhode Island, respectively. I believe John McCain came through Kabul for a few hours; at least that's what I heard from the air crews who flew him. For all I know – and news is sparse out here – other members of Congress have whizzed through Afghanistan recently, as well.
It's too bad none of them made time for a few days with these Cavalry guys, or with soldiers and Marines in any of dozens and dozens of similar places where the war is really being waged. Instead, according to what I read in Stars and Stripes, the daily GI newspaper that comes sporadically and a week late, Levin and Reed had an audience with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, sat through the usual run of high-level military briefings and even met with some senior Afghan elders in Helmand Province (let's guess how much brutal ground truth came out of that ceremony). Then they rushed away and held a press conference to announce what sounded like a pre-cooked finding: Afghanistan doesn't need more U.S. troops; it needs more Afghan troops.
That's the damned trouble with whirlwind visits and high-level briefings, of which I have suffered my share. War is reduced to simplicities and slogans. The military loves PowerPoint presentations – they're easy for generals and politicians to understand -- but they make war into an orderly series of colored arrows that always point toward progress. Add some bright, ornate graphics and a chart or two and pretty soon you've absorbed the illusion that you can sit in Washington and affect the outcome by adjusting an arrow here and tweaking a graph there. Eager briefers, colonels and brigadier generals do nothing to dampen that idea. And because PowerPoint doesn't talk back, you come away with your previously held positions unchanged. Add more U.S. troops, or add more Afghan troops. We're winning the war, or we're losing the war, so we should pull out or try something else. Pick one or the other and let's move on to health care and Obama's school speech.
Had the senators instead spent their two days at COP Zormat, they would have come away with a visceral sense of what is really going on in this country.
They would have seen the straight, bright line that runs from the 9/11 terror attacks that were planned here, straight to COP Zormat, right on the front lines of Preventing it From Happening Again. They'd have seen Afghan and American Army officers putting their heads together trying to figure out where best to position their forces to interdict the stream of insurgents coming in from Pakistan, and how to apportion their fuel so their generators are working and their radios get recharged. They are working out joint maneuver tactics, sharing intelligence, and working out how many Afghan enlisted guys to take off daily operations for some in-depth training with their American sergeant counterparts. In other words, they're fighting a war.
Behind that effort to provide security in this region, the visiting senators would have seen other soldiers and American civilians helping to fortify the foundations of a society that Afghans will soon have to defend on their own, one with a decent local government, access to education and health care, and a vibrant economy. It's an uphill battle, all right, but the Afghans and Americans engaged in the effort are energetic and brimming with optimism.
Our imaginary visitors would understand, from talking to cops and storekeepers, local radio DJs and truck drivers and soldiers and the kids thronging the dusty streets, that there is a long way to go. But they would have felt, from watching American sergeants and Afghan police hugging each other in fond greetings, that good people are committed here to making it work.
I'm afraid very little of that reached the senators' ears and eyes. Had they all spent a few days here at COP Zormat, their views on the war and its conduct might have remained unchanged. But their sense of what's happening on the ground would have deepened.
All this raises an interesting question. High-level briefings and meetings can be (and usually are) held via secure video teleconference without leaving Washington. That being the case, do the senators have the Air Force fly them all the way over here just for the souvenir photos and dinner-party cachet?
Follow PoliticsDaily On Facebook and Twitter,
and download the new Politics Daily toolbar!