just WHO are you asking about whether or not they LIKE their healthcare policy???!!!! NOBODY i know LIKES their policy!!!! my husband pays over $1000/ month, because he has a "pre-existing condition", yet they STILL don't pay 90 percent of his bills.... until he rants ...then, they relent and pay a very small percentage..(they work on the same premise as the big insurance parasite in the John Grisham book did....DENY it all...then hope they go away...or die!)......my insurance comes from blue cross blue shield of az.....do you know how much a mammogram ends up costing me...WITH INSURANCE....$275.00!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....these elite bozos have NO EARTHLY IDEA what 99 percent of "WE THE PEOPLE" ARE ENDURING OUT HERE, IN THE REAL WORLD!!!!!i, for one....am sick and tired of the games these few ELECTED officials are playing with my life!!!! anybody else???!!!

Lib Speak: 79% like their healthcare = "Most Happy" 45% approve of Obama = "Landslide". Do you wonder why noboby listens to you anymore ?

Yesterday American Airlines announced that as of December 31,2009 that 5500 retired executives and support people will no longer have their health insurance payed for by American Airlines. You can bet if there is no reform to health insurance there will be alot more companies dropping the health insurance benefit to their employees.

So your happy with the current state of health care. I hope you pray Congress does not pass their health care bill. for like ERISA 35yrs ago, it WILL be full of loop holes gicing big business, durg companies and insurance compnaies ways to milk the system and deny anything that could cost them money. That is what they did with the law ERISA, in which they forgot to put in place regulations and prevent the insurance company to be the one that decides if you are disabled and has to pay you.
Go to "youtube" and see the video's by "disabledvictim" and learn the truth about how you can be ripped off and think about how with health care they can do the same.

The Capacity to Understand: It is said that it will be hopeless for us to look at a final official version of the health care bill because it will be written in legalese and we are too dumb to understand legalese. Now I have before me a July 14th four page summary of the House "bill" prepared by the House Committees on Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce, and Education and Labor. It reads like Obama talks; so I assume it is his source of information. The simplicity of the summary suggests that it is an edited draft of what was given to the lawyers to use in preparation for the well-known 1000+ page bill. But an examination of the 1000+ bill shows that it is vastly different from the summary. So I submit that it is not we who are stupid; it is our congressional leaders: first for allowing the bill to be prepared in a foreign language (legalese), second for trusting the lawyers to prepare the bill, third for not reading the bill, and fourth for not understanding what they were doing in the first place.

Don't you just get sick and tired of articles like this. Bald faced lies. NO ONE I KNOW even closely trusts anyone in this administration with our Health Care needs, NO ONE. Where in the hell do they come up with their numbers? From Democrats in Congress who are puppets for Obama?

Email YOUR elected and appointed local, state, and Federal officials for FREE and as often as you want. Don't waste your time with the left wing garbage you see on these boards, they are people who don't have a clue, refuse to acknowledge facts, and are totally selective about what they want to hear, see, and discuss. Go to http://www.votesmart.org/index.htm Let them know in no uncertain terms, NO to Obamacare, Thoroughly Investigate Acorn, No Amnesty for Illegals, No Cap and Tax, STOP the attacks on our own CIA, investigate the socialist and communist CZARS, and STOP the lies. If you like the site, pass it on.

Home

Tracking Your Taxes: Medicare Waste Goes Unchecked
As the single largest buyer of medical products, you'd think Medicare would at least get a volume discount. But it doesn't even get the best price.
By William LaJeunesse

FOXNews.com

Monday, October 05, 2009

1

x
in order to recommend a story, you must login or register.

115 Comments | Add Comment

ShareThis
PEOPLE WHO READ THIS ALSO READ
Obama's Pay Czar Targets Salary Cuts 28130920
ACORN Ties Put Pressure on Democrats, Union 28132406
Reid Faces Difficult Task in Merging Senate Bills to Include 'Public Option' 28123950
FTC to Regulate Blogging 28120448
AG: ACORN Embezzlement Totaled $5M, Not $1M 28132404

From wheelchairs and walkers to orthopedic shoes and needles, Medicare buys tens of thousands of products every day for elderly Americans. And as the single largest buyer of medical products, you'd think it would at leastget a volume discount.

But it doesn't. In fact, Medicare doesn't even get the best price.

According to their own auditors, Medicare knowingly overpays for almost everything it buys. Examples include:

-- $7,215 to rent an oxygen concentrator, when the purchase price is $600.

-- $4,018 for a standard wheelchair, while the private sector pays $1,048.

-- $1,825 for a hospital bed, compared to an Internet price of $1,071.

-- $3,335 for a respiratory pump, versus an advertised price of $1,987.

-- $82 for a diabetic supply kit, instead of a $47 price on the Web.

Last year, the Health and Human Services Department tried to replace its archaic fixed-price fee schedule for 10 commonly purchased products with a competitive bidding program in 10 cities. The department said the program could save Medicare $125 million in a single year, or $1 billion if adopted nationwide. But Congress stepped in to stop it.

"There were products that we had as much as 75 percent savings. The average was 29 percent," said Mike Leavitt, the former HHS secretary who oversaw the program.

"It would have saved billions if we could've actually implemented it, but Congress deferred it. In Washington speak, that means we put it off forever," he said.

Leavitt blames Congressmen Pete Stark (D-Calif.) and Dave Camp (R-Mich.) for introducing legislation that terminated the contracts and postponed the program for 18 months. Leavitt says the congressional intervention helps explain why many are suspicious of claims that Washington can cut enough waste to actually pay for health care reform, as President Obama told a joint session of Congress last month.

"Reducing the waste and inefficiency in Medicare and Medicaid will pay for most of this plan," Leavitt said.

"The problem here is one man's waste is another man's living, and whenever there is an effort put forward to actually make an efficiency, someone goes on the offensive and hires lobbyists and does what they can to constrain Congress from doing it," Leavitt said.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the health care industry is currently spending $2 million a day lobbying Congress. Leavitt's pilot program died after small business suppliers claimed it would have put them out of business. Eventually, industry agreed to help pay the cost of terminated contracts that Medicare had already negotiated.

Industry officials argued the new system would unfairly disqualify some suppliers, and others with little experience would get the business, causing a decline in quality and service.

1

x
in order to recommend a story, you must login or register.

115 Comments | Add Comment