McPander should be RUN out of office for picking the idiot stripper last year and possibly putting the USA in serious danger during TWO HOT WARS!!
One bad old man fart and she would of been leader of the free world, which would of meant lap dances would of tripled in price.

START the WAR CRIMES TRIALS of GW, DICK and their lying crew!

My Mission in Running Against John McCain

Eight years ago I challenged the status quo on illegal immigration without thought of political party or ideology. My intent was to bring to peoples’ attention the underlying problem of our border insecurity. I felt then that our two main political parties were part of a three-ring circus with Democrats and Republicans whistled on stage by the Ring Master –main stream media personalities. Little has changed.

Today, conservative media personalities seem to be maneuvering to upstage each other. For example: neoconservative Mark Levin has criticized populist Glenn Beck.
In this mix, I consider myself an independent conservative. I don’t fit into any predefined box. My mission is, and always has been, to open the eyes of a widely apathetic citizenry.
I agree with Beck when he says that a President McCain would have been no better than President Obama. It partially explains why I’m challenging John McCain in the Republican primary next August.

McCain voted for TARP. He has nurtured Cap & Trade and accepted the scientifically dubious premise that global warming is man made as well as a clear and present danger to the planet. McCain is engaged in the health care debate when he should be leading a Senate effort to stop it on the ground that it’s unconstitutional. And, McCain supports the failed organization that is the United Nations.

Meanwhile, we learn that Obama plans to cut funding for border security. The truth is that McCain never wanted to fix our porous borders in the first place. I, along with tens of thousands of citizens, held a Tea Party on the border in 2005. We led the charge to stop the McCain-Kennedy amnesty bill in 2006. We forced Congress to build over 600 miles of fencing in 2007. Yet, the border problem remains a serious issue regardless of the party in charge. And it will only improve until voters demand change.

On the border issue, Beck is right. A President McCain would have been no better than Obama. In 2004, McCain told me, to my face, that what I was doing on the border would bring more trouble than the drug cartels. Meanwhile, McCain and Obama both sit idly by allowing the drug cartels to expand their criminal activities into U.S. cities and essentially control America’s southern border.

I respect the libertarian principles of Constitution, Freedom and Liberty. I’m running as a registered Republican with the goal of helping move the GOP toward becoming a party that embraces those principles. Among some in the Republican establishment the attitude toward me is “How dare you! Who the hell gave you permission to do this! You’re going to screw the whole damn thing up.”
I fully expected that response. It’s symptomatic of a political party that needs an awakening. And I believe that awakening will be delivered upon it by patriotic voters in 2010 in Arizona.

My response to the GOP establishment, and to Mark Levin, in defense of Beck is that Beck is doing what a good teacher does, and what I did when I was a teacher. He’s starting with the basics - government 101 – and building from there.

My love of the Constitution and my deep respect for the freedom-loving conservatives of Arizona call me to run against John McCain. He, progressive liberals, and the professional GOP party loyalists should take note. People are demanding that politicians return their government to its Constitutional foundation. In the next election, they will elect Congressional representatives who will protect our free market economic system, our borders, and our national security.

So I’m running as a states’ rights candidate. And I will, when elected, work to protect the state from federal government encroachments. I will work closely with Arizona’s elected representatives to protect the rights of Arizona’s citizens. I will not enter the Senate with the overriding goal of working for the GOP or the federal government. I will go to bring a message from the American people that says, “Keep it simple; stay out of our private lives; do what’s necessary to defend the nation. And don’t impede our industry or stand in the way of our enterprising spirit flourishing once again.”
Chris Simcox
Candidate for U.S. Senate Arizona
www.simcoxforsenate.com

Chris Simcox is one of the few people that can bring conservative values to the senate. McCain as much as he has served his country is too old and tired to serve now. McCain is no Maverick! Chris Simcox will add new ideas and get things done without trying to be politically correct and trying to “get alone” with his colleges. Chris Simcox needs to be ready for the attacks he is going to get about his pass and track record. Don’t get discouraged. His life is clean and way more honest than that of Obama. So far we know that Chris Simcox is not friends with any known terrorist or anti-American pastors. Go Chris Simcox for Senate in Arizona.

McCain makes the case for bringing back a mandatory retirement age. Before we became both politically correct and greedy in wanting to suck more social security taxes out of seniors, we used to be much more sensible about how long a person should be in the work force. This is even more pronounced with our elected leaders, who are holding on to the office well after their productive days have passed.

Is the country better served by seniors like McCain,Byrd,Rangel etc when we can have younger and more energetic leaders that have not been tainted by the politics as usual. I think not.

Why are they the last to know this.....

I don't care if hes been a prisoner of war,or a prisoner in his own mind.Mr.Mcshame is a two faced lying burnt up ole man.That was surely made clear by his pick for a running mate last year.I was surprised when he took credit for introducing a bill for veterans last year only too turn around and vote against it when it came too the floor for a vote,saying it would cost too much.Its these kinda burnt up old men we should be looking to replace,if you've been a senator for more than 10 yrs either your a thief,or a great liar or both.

Hmmm .... I thought"McCain's being out-of-touch" was decided during last election --- not only in AZ but across the country.

You know how the USA doesnt allow fellons to vote. He was a prisoner of war for years, and I know that had to affect his thinking.

He may be a RINO. old, out of touch and a loser but he is way better than any Marxist Messiah
Ummmm.....Ummm....Ummm.....

He and Obama were both out of touch since the last election.

The key is not that these people are old, but that they have served more than two terms. Our founding fathers did not intend that anyone should serve on Congress or the Presidency more than two terms. Washington, Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe all did not seek a third term. For the President, there is the 22nd amendment established in 1947 because Franklin D. Roosevelt died in his 4th term in office. There should be a similar amendment for Congress. More than two terms breeds corruption and fraud and we know there are several members of Congress in jail now, and probably more that just haven't got caught. If they can't get their campaign goals done in two terms, then they aren't worth a third term.

John MCcain, was out of touch in the vietam conflick because he was a POW for 5 death years, how dare anybody judge him or president Obama, your united, or your a want-to-be want-to-be...