For the first time in my life, I am without health insurance and it is a terrible feeling.
In the past, I paid attention to the health care debate as a speechwriter who prepared speeches, talking points, op-eds, and debate prep material on the topic at different times for John Edwards, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and others. Now, I'm paying attention because I'm a citizen up the creek without a paddle.
Get the new PD toolbar! Throughout my life, I have been very lucky because my insurance has always been there whenever I had a crisis. When my 10-speed hit a patch of leftover winter sand, and I went flying into a telephone pole, it covered the x-rays and stitches and concussion diagnosis. When a half a ton of sheet rock fell on me, my insurance paid for the cast on my foot. When my depression kicked in and I was hospitalized and painting ceramic pieces in art therapy to boost my self-esteem (sheesh), it made sure that when I got home my medical bills didn't make me reach for a razor. And when there were growths in my uterus, it covered that medical procedure and every regular check-up, lab test, broken bone, sports injury, and antibiotic prescription in between.
Since I care more about my country than my personal pride, here's how I lost my insurance: I moved. That's right, I moved from Washington, D.C., back to Massachusetts, a state with universal health care.
In D.C., I had a policy with a national company, an HMO, and surprisingly I was very happy with it. I had a fantastic primary care doctor at Georgetown University Hospital. As a self-employed writer, my premium was $225 a month, plus $10 for a dental discount.
In Massachusetts, the cost for a similar plan is around $550, give or take a few dollars. My risk factors haven't changed. I didn't stop writing and become a stunt double. I don't smoke. I drink a little and every once in a while a little more than I should. I have a Newfoundland dog. I am only 41. There has been no change in the way I live my life except my zip code -- to a state with universal health care.
Massachusetts has enacted many of the necessary reforms being talked about in Washington. There is a mandate for all residents to get insurance, a law to prevent insurance companies from denying coverage because of a pre-existing condition, an automatic enrollment requirement, and insurance companies are no longer allowed to cap coverage or drop people when they get sick because they forgot to include a sprained ankle back in 1989 on their application.
Even if the economy was strong and I was working more, I still couldn't afford my premium. I am not alone; I've got 46 million friends in a similar situation. We wake up every day worried that a bad cough, an accident while walking the dog, or that dreaded pain on the right side of the abdomen will send us into complete financial ruin.
As luck would have it, I didn't schedule a physical before I left D.C. I thought I could get that taken care of when I moved -- after all they had reforms, automatic enrollment, and universal coverage in Massachusetts, all the things I'd written about for politicians. Health care would be affordable. It didn't dawn on me that it would just be affordable for other people.
Now, sharing my experience doesn't make me an expert in health care policy anymore more than my knowledge that Kajagoogoo sings "Too Shy" makes me an expert in music. What my story does is serve as a cautious reminder that we need to get this right, not right away. A rushed bill will have consequences. Reforms will not be cheap and some people may be priced out.
How could all of these weeks and months go by and no one is examining and talking about what has worked and what hasn't worked in Massachusetts?
While the state has the lowest rate of uninsured, a report by the Commonwealth Fund states that Massachusetts has the highest premiums in the country. The state's budget is a mess and lawmakers had to make deep cuts in services and increase the sales tax to close gaps. The number of people needing assistance has at times overwhelmed the state. The mandate means that some people who can't afford insurance are now being slapped with a fine they also can't afford. There is no "public option" in the way the president describes it, no inter-state competition, no pool for small businesses and self-employed individuals like me to buy into groups that negotiate cheaper rates. So far I haven't found any "death panels," but if I get sick and need a hospital, I sure hope I can find one and a feisty granny to pull my plug.
What makes this a double blow is that my experience contradicts so much of what I wrote for political leaders over the last decade. That's a terrible feeling, too. I typed line after line that said everything Massachusetts did would make health insurance more affordable. If I had a dollar for every time I typed, "universal coverage will lower premiums," I could pay for my own health care at Massachusetts's rates.
So far, the most informed and civil discussion I've had about this issue has been with some of the sales representatives with the top providers in Massachusetts as I searched for an affordable plan. Each person I talked to was kind and considerate and truthful. One man said that heprepares everyone for the"sticker-shock," whether they are a family of four or an individual.
Right now, the truth is if I could buy my health plan from D.C., then I would. If I could buy into a public option, co-op, or trigger plan, whatever they want to call it, then I would. If I qualified for the new exchange, then I'd get into that, too, but four years is a long time to go without a physical, pap smear, and to have this mole checked. If someone were to put Medicare for All back on the table, then I would be fine with that too. Honestly, it's starting to make the most fiscal sense: $450 billion we pay to insurance companies could be redirected to Medicare, $350 billion in savings in paper work, and of course that $500 billion in savings for "waste, fraud, and abuse."
If this country is about to gamble a trillion dollars plus -- and it will be a big plus no matter what the Congressional Budget Office projection is -- then why not use a system that already exists? My experience in politics has been any time a politician says $500 billion will come from "waste, fraud, and abuse" that's a fancy way of saying, "Hold on to your wallet; we'll pay for it later."
We have to be careful about how we spend this trillion dollars. Right now, we are $1.4 trillion in the hole and the Senate has been asked to raise the country's debt ceiling to $12 trillion. We are fighting two wars and may increase troop levels in one. We have 250 new Iraq and Afghanistan veterans seeking care from VA facilities every day, and unemployment is headed north, past 10 percent. Has anyone else thought, "Hey wait a minute? Why are we proposing to spend so much on a mess of a plan?"
Why can't Washington look north to Massachusetts? What's the lesson for the nation in its successes and failures: universal coverage first or cost reductions? If health care is a right, then why aren't we starting over with Medicare for All? If health care is a responsibility, then why aren't we changing the system to address that? There is a big red flag planted in the middle of this state and it looks like everyone's just pledging allegiance to it rather understanding the warning in its wave.
For now, I'm going to have to get used to this terrible feeling. I'll eat right. I'll drive 55. I'll keep my dog on a tight heel and pet her to keep my blood pressure down. And I'll hope the economy turns around soon and $6,600 or so a year for health insurance doesn't seem so unaffordable.
I want health care reform. I need it, but I want Washington to start over. It doesn't make me "un-American" or "astroturf" or "racist." I'm a critic because what Washington is talking about doing has made health insurance unaffordable in Massachusetts.
If Washington won't go for a simple clean move to a system like Medicare for All, then it needs to do one reform, one new law, at a time -- not with a 1,000 page bill where strange things can hide. Line up the 80 percent of things we agree on and vote one at a time to change pre-existing conditions, cut that $500 billion in Medicare's "waste, fraud, and abuse," create meaningful lawsuit reform, and add some real competition to insurance companies whether it's a public option or a pilot exchange program. Show the country that this is possible with lower premiums and more efficiency and then go for the tough stuff. Critics like me want something done right because we actually are up the creek without a paddle.
If Congress and the president want to fix health care, then it is time to start over. They need to look at what's worked and what has failed in Massachusetts. They are going to have to actually take former Gov. Sarah Palin's advice and "look north to the future." Who knew that would ever make sense? But if we continue on this current path without looking, it's easy to diagnose what's coming to the country when a health care bill passes.
A mess.
Wendy Button has written for John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Barack Obama, and Mayor Tom Menino of Boston as well as other national and international leaders, and is working on a book.
The good news is that health care reform WILL PASS soon. The tide is definitely turning back to sanity. Once again the lies and scare tactics of the delusional right wing will fail, like they've always fail. As the American voters proved last November...
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-475)
Stella
7:14AM Oct 8th 2009
It doesn't take a government takeover of healthcare to solve this man's issue. All is needed is the ability to freely purchase health insurance across state lines and in ALL STATES--something in the Republican's plan (yes, they have one). Look at representative Mike Ryan's FREE HEALTH CARE CHOICE ACT--that was thrown in the trash by our lovely democratically controlled House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (333)
tddkleis
8:15AM Oct 8th 2009
Stella must be believing her own lies if she thinks this is a government takeover of our health care system. This is why you guys always lose, nobody believes your lies in the long run.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-311)
tddkleis
8:17AM Oct 8th 2009
Bob Dole supports health care reform.
"This is one of the most important measures members of Congress will vote on in their lifetimes," the former Republican Senate majority leader and presidential candidate told an audience in Kansas City today. "If we don't do it this year I don't know when we're gonna do it.
Dole and two other former Senate leaders, Republican Howard Baker and Democrat Tom Daschle, are preparing to release a statement urging Congress to move on health care.
"We're already hearing from some high-ranking Republicans that we shouldn't do that. That's helping the president," he said.
Later, he repeated that news, and elaborated on one "very prominent Republican, who happens to be the Republican leader of the Senate."
That would be Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.
Dole, to his credit, is having none of it. "I want this to pass," he said. "I don't agree with everything Obama is presenting, but we've got to do something."
He added: "I don't want the Republicans putting up a 'no' sign and saying, 'we're not open for business.'"
The long-time senator from Kansas mentioned several time the Americans with Disabilities Act, which he was instrumental in getting passed in 1990. And he talked about working across the aisle to rescue Social Security from a short-term financing crisis in 1983.
It makes me wonder, what will Mitch McConnell and company cite as their legacy? Perfecting the use of the word "no," maybe.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-218)
Stella
8:22AM Oct 8th 2009
tddkleiss--normally Bob Dole is what liberals use to define the "old fart" wing of the GOP. Now, I see you gladly use him to peddle your idea of a solution to our health care problems. How clever, and obvious you are.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (160)
jba35129
9:54AM Oct 8th 2009
Sleep with edwards, he'll pay for it !!! Lets get going !!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (71)
Megan
12:13PM Oct 9th 2009
Stella, how astute of you. I can see you pay careful attention and can be trusted to know what you're talking about. Except that you failed to notice that "this man" has a uterus, as mentioned in the article. Now I don't trust you to be smart enough to make a comment worth considering. But thanks for trying.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-14)
Stryyder56
2:05PM Oct 9th 2009
TDDKLIESS Did you read the article? What freakin dream world are you living in? The Mass. plan does NOT WORK. So you want the government to institute one just like it for everyone else? So tell me why congress is abstaining themselves from joining such a plan? I will tell you why, because it SUCKS..................
RATE THIS COMMENT: (49)
karenione
2:06PM Oct 9th 2009
We already have affordable insurance. It is called Medicaid. Why won't the government set it up so all of the uninsured can purchase it. Everyone... even those collecting welfare can pay something. It is right there in front of them. Ahhh, but they want to get more money from the taxpayer and misuse it. Our government is going to hell in a handbasket and I don't want to go with them. All of our governing body, male, female, all races and religions, have left us out in the cold. Until they walk in our shoes, they will never understand our needs. They need to only serve 2 terms, buy their own PRIVATE insurance, and get NO PENSION... this includes the president. HELL, THEY WORK FOR US DAMN IT, we don't work for them!!!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (39)
zft
6:48AM Oct 8th 2009
you will not get something for nothing / what ever is passed you will pay more I have /AARP & Medicare 5,400 per year/ when you receive paymnents as you are self employed increace your compensation to cover the insurance
RATE THIS COMMENT: (62)
frobic4536
6:49AM Oct 8th 2009
Wendy,your article should be required reading for all the politicians in Washington. There is no one quick "fix" for our health care system. It is critical that time is taken to get it right.My fear is that Washington is now hurried to get something done. I do not have the confidence that the politicians will get it right.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (251)
Lizzie
4:24PM Oct 9th 2009
It would be nice if the politician would READ the bills the pass. But as long it does not concern them, who cares.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (14)
chartrandmax
7:04AM Oct 8th 2009
It is an absolute farce to think that a garantuntun federal program that does not have incentives for personal responsibility, good health practice, and fiscal restraint is not going to be strapped with the same experience as other federal fisacos: cost overruns, exploding taxes, and abuse through the roof. Furthermore, how much privacy are Americans willing to give up in the form of a national ID card, which has tenacles into their bank accounts, property liens, and OnStar-like tracking? We have some wonderful solutions available that will help us be a healthier people, make healthcare more affordable, and will not destroy the rights and freedoms under the Constitution. But the liberal politicians do NOT want to hear them. They want power, they want our money, and they want the middle class to disappear in the name of saving it from itself. Well, its time we got rid of them and found ourselves a whole new set of representatives who believe in less government, more individual responsibility, and a deep, abiding reverence for the author of our freedoms and liberties. Lets fight this Trojan Horse of a healthcare bill as if our life and liberty depending it. It will, if we don't. ---Dr. Max S. Chartrand
RATE THIS COMMENT: (178)
Cooper
9:07AM Oct 9th 2009
What the hell is "garantuntun???"
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-17)
nuts4ducks
7:23AM Oct 8th 2009
This author makes it sound like if you don't have insurance you can't be treated or have routine exams. That couldn't be farther from the truth. I know that it has, or is quickly becomming un-American to pay for something you recieve, but, you can actually have routine PREVENTAIVE care exams and testing done and "OH MY GOD" pay,for it. The Dr.s are more than willing to take payment if needed. You can walk into any hospital if you have a condition to be treated and BY LAW they must render care if they recieve any gov. funding. What do Edwards, Kennedy and Obama have in common, other than being Senators...Lawyers!!! I find it interesting that Tort reform is never mentioned in the cost of providing health care.....Wonder why????
RATE THIS COMMENT: (135)
diana
9:25AM Oct 8th 2009
FYI..torte reform has been already passed in some state...Florida being one of them and it did nothing to lower the cost of health care. Think about it who is torte reform really going to help anyway...insurance companies who do not have to pay out.... This is another BS lie put out by the insurance companies for the insurance companies.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-118)
Saaristos
10:59AM Oct 9th 2009
Have you actually tried pay for health care? I took my daughter for a 10 minute sick visit with some lab work. The cost: $1000. No one has the right to comment until they experience the world of no insurance and try to access health care. I want to be able to "pay for it ourselves!" I hate relying on insurance companies. There is no good answer. The whole thing is a mess and we all have created it with our quickness to litigation and our dependence on government and health insurance. We all are to blame.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (33)
Ellen
11:08AM Oct 9th 2009
If you do not have healh insurance in Tax-achusetts, you get fined when you file your taxes. There are many who would like to "self-insure"... they just get fined if they do..
RATE THIS COMMENT: (19)
greatqb44
7:28AM Oct 8th 2009
Let's hope you dont need a cath..or a wheelchair....thanks,max