Recently, I asked a GOP consultant, who must remain nameless here, this question: Who advises Sarah Palin? His answer: No one. Really? I asked. Yes, he said, really.
So that explains it.
Palin's actions keep defying rational explanation. Her sudden retreat from her job as Alaska governor made her seem a quitter -- especially when she couldn't coherently justify the resignation during her surprise July 4 weekend announcement. Even if Palin's pullout had been a reasonable decision, it seemed as if she had not consulted anyone with PR or political sense on how best to handle the controversial move.
Since then, her performance as a politician with a chance of snagging the GOP presidential nomination has been -- to be polite -- unsteady. On July 17, Palin, who had become a prolific Twitterer, sent out this message to her tweeps: "10 dys til less politically correct twitters fly frm my fingertps outside State site." In other words, Palin -- who had recently been quoting Aristotle and Thomas Paine in her tweets -- would soon dump her AkGovSarahPalin Twitter account, which was being followed by 150,000 people, and start sharing her observations via a new Twitter feed. But she didn't keep that promise -- and has yet to set up a new Twitter account for all those folks who yearn for her 140-character messages. Why keep her base waiting? Any good adviser would have recommended that she keep the tweets flowing.
Toward the end of July, Palin found herself in another curious predicament when she apparently retreated from a speech at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library. On her Facebook page -- her communications platform of choice these days -- Palin maintained that she had not committed to attend the Simi Valley Republican Women's event. Yet that GOP-gals outfit had issued a press release declaring that she had indeed agreed to speak at their shindig at the Reagan Library. As with an earlier dust-up over an appearance at a Republican fundraiser in Washington, it appeared that Palin couldn't handle a routine scheduling matter.
Then there's her book. A few days ago, a GOPer close to Mitt Romney, another potential contender for the 2012 Republican nomination, was laughing as we talked about Palin's book, due out next month. He was tittering especially about its title, "Going Rogue." That phrase was used by John McCain's aides toward the end of the 2008 election to describe Palin's off-message behavior on the campaign trail. "What voter wants a rogue president?" this Mitt-friendly Republican said to me, pointing out that Romney has finished a book of his own on weighty policy matters that will come out next year. Its title: "No Apology: The Case of American Greatness."
I understand that Palin has an interest in promoting her self-proclaimed maverickness -- and that she now wears her friction with the loser McCainiacs as a badge of honor. There certainly are GOP base-voters who fancy her from-the-frontier gumption. (And she endeared herself to Tea Baggers across the country by insisting that the Obama health care plan would create "death panels" for seniors -- before declaring that, thanks to her, there would be no "death panels" in the plan.) But the Romney ally had a point when he remarked, "Do most Americans want rogueness or greatness?"
Will Palin use her books to score revenge points? (Levi Johnston, this means you!) Will she dish dirt on inside Republican politics? Will she have anything original to say about policy matters? ("My quick-and-easy five-step plan for winning the war in Afghanistan.") The Palin story has become a popular media soap opera. If she ignores the trashier aspects of this ever-titillating tale, she will disappoint a lot of people. Yet if she does address them, who's going to pay attention to yet another drill-baby-drill plea? If Palin has any hopes about a future in politics -- and maybe she doesn't -- getting this book right is a tough challenge for her. It will receive one hell of a cross-examination from different audiences, including journalists, pundits, GOPers, Democratic and Republican oppo researchers, Levi Johnston, voters who read, and maybe even a chastened David Letterman. If Palin hasn't obtained solid advice about how to handle this book, she will be in perilous territory.
And there's no sign that such advice is within her reach. Just in the past few days, she fell into an unnecessary scuffle with the Republican gubernatorial candidate in Virginia, Bob McDonnell. After he said that Palin wouldn't be campaigning with him because she was "busy with books and other things like that," Meg Stapleton, a spokeswoman for Palin, said that was not the case. Stapleton went on to explain in great detail how McDonnell had tried several times to enlist Palin's assistance and that Palin had said she'd be delighted to join him on the campaign trail. But, Stapleton added, McDonnell sent word in early August that Palin was no longer wanted. (McDonnell's about-face occurred before his ultra-conservative master's thesis -- no jobs for wives! no condoms for unmarried couples! -- was uncovered, giving him good cause to steer clear of a leading social conservative.)
All this was too much information. The way to play this was obvious. Stapleton should have just said, Palin offered to assist McDonnell, and she stands ready to do so if he believes that would be useful. Instead, Stapleton, on behalf of Palin, lashed out at a fellow GOPer, causing him to look a bit foolish, and made it seem that Palin is indeed a hot potato for GOP candidates. Not a smooth move.
It's certainly possible that Palin is stumbling -- and laughing -- all the way to the bank. She's making money by giving speeches -- recently in Hong Kong she delivered what's been described as a "rambling" address to a group of businesspeople -- and her book, due to pre-orders, hit the No. 1 slot at Amazon.com. If all she cares about is notoriety and cash, she's doing just fine. But if she is serious about presidential politics, she will have to find better help.
You can follow David Corn's postings and media appearances via Twitter.
David Corn is the Washington bureau chief for Mother Jones magazine. Prior to that he was the Washington editor of The Nation magazine for twenty years... more
When Republican Scott Brown won the Senate seat in Massachusetts, among the many congratulatory phone calls he took on Election Night was reportedly one from Sarah Palin.
So why, wondered The...
Sen. John McCain defended former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin against charges made about her in a new book and what he called attacks from the "liberal left."
During a news conference Thursday in...
Politics Daily Editor in Chief Melinda Henneberger appeared on "Hardball With Chris Matthews" on Thursday to discuss Sarah Palin's vague response to Glenn Beck's question about her favorite Founding...
Well David, this might be the article that yields you at least 2000 comments. I am not going to say that I think for sure she is ready to run for Presidency. I dont know, but I think its going to take a lot more time than just a year. Some dont like her and some do. A Gay person on another article from 2 days ago said "at least she was honest", about how she felt on issues. This surprised me and this person instantly has my respect, because most gay people are against her. It shows how unbiased we can all be if we try and see something positive in someone instead of being negative, I'm just as guilty as anyone else here posting on the Political Daily.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (65)
jrotced02
11:01PM Oct 12th 2009
"Honest" and "Sarah Palin" should never be used in the same sentence. She either conspired with or permitted the Republican Party to lie about her record in Alaska.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-31)
buster
6:20AM Oct 12th 2009
All she could do is judge a cooking contest, thats it. It is very, very obvious that she is really very mentally challenged, thinks very slowly, and is a borderline fool. She is an embarassment to women, Alaskans, and Americans.
There is no doubt Dems and Indepen, will vote for her in 2012 GOP primary's, push her to the TOP and watch OBAMA finish the republicans off forever in General election.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-90)
paul
6:37AM Oct 12th 2009
mmmm David Corn .. a household name ? No just another lib with an opinion. I don't understand what you libs are so up tight about with Palin.. you give her tons of press...... keeping her in the light of the political bulb while trashing here every step as if you all actually had the right answer to every question.. but fail to give these answers.. get a life David.. get a life... why not spend you key board time writing about something that is really important and yeap hard to research and intellectual in it's end.. how about why the dollar is going to be worth mmmm nothing in the near future.. how about how the country is broker than broke yet the fed reserve still insists on the treasure printing money.. no country has ever spent their way out of debt.. no country has ever survived socialism .. look what happened to Rome.. how an article on the tri-lateral commission and how many of these members are in Obama's cabinet.. come on David bring it up a notch
RATE THIS COMMENT: (32)
blackrightwinger
9:58AM Oct 13th 2009
Paul, they will never admit any wrongdoing. They always try to blame republicans or plead ignorance. The emperor himself while campaigning that we cannot spend our way out of this, yet he is doing EXACTLY that, except his purpose is redistributive. He is methodically raping and pillaging our economy in order to send it into anarchy so as to forever change it!That's my opinion and I am sticking to it.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (2)
buseye4life
6:44AM Oct 12th 2009
If Sarah Palin was serious about politics she wouldn't have bailed out on the people of Alaska as governor under pressure. Being under pressure and scrutinized comes with the terrotory of being a politician. I wouldn't want her as my president because just as she bowed out on the people of Alaska she will no doubt as it was proven before that she will crack under pressure and bow out on the rest of America. That kind of leadership America does not need in times like these.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-7)
dave fiorini
7:57AM Oct 12th 2009
I have heard David Corns comments on TV. All I can say is that he seems to be a extreme leftist and out of touch with most Americans. Why keep picking on Sarah Palin ? She is going to surprise and help alot of people in 2010 and come up with some real surprises in 2012. David Corn, Obama is your guy, why not talk about him, are you distancing yourself from him also ??????
RATE THIS COMMENT: (29)
jrotced02
4:53PM Oct 12th 2009
I predict that when Sarah goes on tour to promote her ghost written book, she will end any aspirations for a political career, and her fans can finally stop pretending that she has a snowball's chance in hell, running for any public office ever again. You think she can promote this book on Oprah? On The View? On C-SPAN? Best seller? Ask Newt Gingrich how he manipulated the NYT best sellers list, by having his minions make bulk purchaces from key stores, then distributed the books as gifts for a tax deduction. This is one of the things that got him FIRED as House Speaker.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-14)
stan
1:40AM Oct 13th 2009
Sarah's goanna what??? help alot of people in 2010 and 12??? who??? us dems?? if you haven't noticed...it's republicans up for re-election that are distancing themselves from dumbass Palin!! the born agian profiteer is radioactive!!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-4)
Zoe
7:47AM Oct 12th 2009
Sarah Palin is serious about one thing SARAH PALIN!!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-34)
gobucsmom
7:56AM Oct 12th 2009
She is serious about only one thing - herself! Levi Johnston's article in Vanity Fair made it clear that she is a greedy, selfish, short-sighted gold-digger. Please don't buy her book, don't give her the money!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-2)
tbr3guys
8:52AM Oct 12th 2009
levi, there is a credible source. go with that...
RATE THIS COMMENT: (13)
mrmrkw01
4:31PM Oct 12th 2009
If you put that much faith into any word that is attributed to Levi Johnson,there is something very wrong with your judgement.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (18)
Carol
8:50AM Oct 12th 2009
Maybe it is her honesty, and NOT the "politics as usual" that is attractive to people. Or at least people who seek honesty. If she were to take advice from political advisors then perhaps she would dish out more of the same. Course that is not to undermind the political genious of lets say... Nancy Pelosi. She is a Master politician isn't she? A genious for sure. But lets focus our efforts dismantling someone that isn't even in office.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
Harpro
10:24AM Oct 12th 2009
Palin lied about the Bridge to Nowhere. She lied about Troopergate. She lied about death panels. You need to open your eyes and ears.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (0)
cjjanis
8:51AM Oct 12th 2009
What Turd and his like here don't understand that Obama winning the Noble Peace Prize is a great honor for the nation. Just like getting the Olympic Games is a great honor for the nation as well as a way to showcase what a great country we are. Nope Turd here like Rush seem to take great pride with siding with our enemies against our President and America. Anyone doubt this needs to give Rushbo show from last week a listen as he laughs about being on the same side of many issues with the Taliban? These are the same folks who attacked the "Cars for Clunkers" program that put Americans back to work and got polluting cars off the road. More and more these folks choose to sided themselves with out enemies, and now many within their own party see the damage being done. But rest assured these Republicans that take pride these honors for our country and have spoken out against these fellow Republican losers will themselves become the target of these same traitors, watch you'll see.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-46)
Alex Lekas
8:52AM Oct 12th 2009
when running low on column ideas, turn to Sarah Palin. She's always good for 750 words of barely disguised contempt and, with that, David can turn to the folks who run this site and say, "See, I can stir up the masses; I am not just an opinion leader, I am an opinion maker".
Who cares what she is serious about? Last anyone checked, she currently holds no office, has no control over the expenditure of public moneys, has no control over the formulation of policy, can do none of the damage that comes from the elected class.
She is, however, a convenient foil for liberals bereft of ideas of their own and for lefties ever in search of a boogeyman. Look how easily a fool like buster gets spun up; just mention the name 'Sarah Palin' and he breaks into a froth. No doubt others of his stripe will chime in with their usual keen insight and sharp wit - what the rest of us would call juvenile insults - because it takes the focus away from the fecklessness and ineffectiveness of their side.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (17)
buster
11:47AM Oct 12th 2009
HELLO McFLY ANYBODY HOME!!!!
pay attention..
DEMS and INDEPENS will vote for PALIN in 2012 GOP primary, you mix in the fannypack fools and the IDIOT STRIPPER will WIN GOP nomination easy, then the GOP feeling pressed, will DIG up RONNY RAYGUN and WELD him to a piece of sheet metal, with lit and firing roman candles ,shooting from each of his ears and propped up as PALINS VP.
THen OBAMA SMASHES the THE REPUBLICAN PARTY into smithereens FOREVER, with 400 PLUS electoral votes in GENERAL. Palin might get 100% of the BLACK vote in the GOP PRIMARYS.
Got it Mcfly.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-9)
garry402
8:52AM Oct 12th 2009
Anothe one of your corn pone 'pinions, David. Anyway, she looks good in blue jeans.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (13)
Mindy
8:58AM Oct 12th 2009
Sarah Palin reminds me of another Republican governor that looney lefties called dumb, along with other names. Because he was a man of the people, similar to Palin being a woman of the people, Ronald Reagan went on to win two (2) landslide victories for the presidency. History has a way of repeating itself, and this has looney lefties terrified.
***** BREAKING NEWS***** B. Hussein Obama has just won the Cy Young Award announced Major League Baseball.