Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Sometimes, a Doll is Just a Doll

5 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Once a year, usually around my birthday, my mother laments my childhood Barbie trauma. "I should have bought it for you," she says glumly. "You wanted it, and I should have bought it."

The CNN story of Stacy McBride-Irby, who created a new line of black Barbies so that her daughter could have a doll that looked like her, did remind me of how jealous I'd been of my friend Tootie's Barbie, and how, when my mother refused to buy me the doll, I went straight to the store and spent the $4.95 myself. (Where had I gotten $4.95? I was 6. I have no idea.) But it also reminded me of something our hyper-vigilant, uber-attuned, highly trained parenting culture prefers to ignore. Parents do have an influence over their children -- but it's rarely the influence they're trying to have.

There's a persistent belief that Barbie's particular mode of beauty -- freezer-pop slim, hair a bright shade of margarine -- represents a challenge to growing girls' self-esteem, especially girls who aren't white. The article quotes (unbelievably gorgeous) actress Nia Long, discussing the issue on CNN: "Historically, the Afrocentric features have not been celebrated. This makes us question the integrity of our beauty standard for ourselves."

Experts have even suggested that girls mutilate their Barbies (there's a stunning video desecration gallery on YouTube) as a mode of rejection. True, in the mutilation department, Tootie and I were no slouches. After immediately ripping off Barbie's gold evening mini, we engaged in a battery of abuse: popping limbs from her sockets, poking pin-holes in her torso, stabbing her mouth in a futile attempt to get it to open. (I was particularly bent on bending flat her perma-arched feet.)

But I think this abuse stemmed less from a preoccupation with Barbie's beauty than with the fact that she seemed to come so pre-mutilated. From the soles of her crucified feet (all the better to pin heels to, my dear) to her swiss-cheese scalp to her side-hinged, completely smooth pelvis, she was all holes and gashes where they didn't belong and none where they did. Unlike Candyland or Battleship, here we could intuit the directions. Wasn't the next move to take a knife and see if you could hack off a hand?

Which leads me to my point: how absurdly impenetrable are the motivations of children at play. Sure, we mutilated Barbie. We made her repeatedly pummel Ken. (Skipper, a tool for their twisted desires, always had to watch.) A neighbor and I gave her over to the inappropriate attentions of Snoopy, then took turns pretending we were tight-rope walking them on a two-foot wall. One day, we took every stuffed animal in the house, placed them under a blue blanket as if we were putting them to bed, and splashed water over every last one.

What were we thinking? (This may have been what Tootie's mother in fact screamed: "What were you thinking??????") I don't remember. But I'm sure it made sense to me at the time.

Some of you may remember the "Bewitched" episode in which Darren's white clients visit on Christmas and give Tabitha a white doll, her black friend a black doll, and a baby whose parentage they can't quite discern a stuffed panda. Darren and Samantha gently rebuke the couple for their racial absolutism, and as the show closes, the baby clutches the black doll, Tabitha plays with the panda and the black girl with the white doll. (Or does the black girl get the panda? This is why I would have failed the LSATs: "If three children have a panda, a white doll and a black doll to share, and each can't play with their cultural signifier...")

The episode's point was that children are too innocent to see color. (And, implicitly, that there is not way to express biracial identity without crossing species, but that's another issue.) But as a biracial panda-person, I lived in terror of someone giving me a biracial doll, or a doll that had any utility beyond dollness, for that matter. What was the adult asking me to do? Drag it out every Christmas, like an ugly grandma sweater? Confirm in my crayon thank-you it had validated my identity?

But what the episode unintentionally got right was that you can't control what children will do and feel about what you give them. Today especially, parents seem to strive for a kind of predictable exchange: Tofu-pop in, invincible child out. But giving a child a black Barbie and expecting it to make her feel beautiful is as absurd as handing a child a stuffed Orca (I had one) and expecting her to grow up to be a marine biologist. (I am not.) That kid in the corner, licking the wooden spoon? He loves it. And you will never know why.

As it happens, my mother didn't refuse to buy me the Barbie because she didn't want me to have a white doll, or she thought Barbie's physique would damage my self-esteem. She was, by her own admission, in a bad mood, and she did it to be mean. It was a bad-mother daughter moment, one that dogs us both. In the case of Stacy McBride-Irby's daugther, will it be playing with a black doll that will matter? Or will it be the fact that her mother's creation of a line of dolls was a profound act of love for her, and, by extension, a generation of girls?

I don't know. I'm still stuck on that panda.
Filed Under: Woman Up
Outbrain - The Most Trusted Content Discovery Platform

Get Your Content Discovered.

Promote your content on premium websites

Learn More ›

Outbrain Amplify:
Get your content discovered

Your content will be promoted on the web's largest and most respected media properties, including, Slate and ESPN. We make sure it's seen precisely when people will find it most interesting.

Learn More

Outbrain Engage: The solution for a modern publisher

Outbrain Engage is a full stack software solution that empowers an entire media organization to more effectively manage its online content and programming experience.

Learn More

The world's largest content discovery platform

We bring together premium publishers and marketers of all sizes (including many of the world's leading brands) into the world's largest and most vibrant content marketplace. Learn more about Outbrain ›

561 Million

The global audience reached by Outbrain each month*

190 Billion

The total recommendations we serve consumers monthly


Of the world’s leading brands use Outbrain

* Audience reach according to comScore, September 2014. Leading brands via Ad Age DataCenter / Kantar Media, 2014.

Andy Blau
We selected Outbrain not only because the revenues were higher than others, but because its engine drives better recommendations than others.
Andy Blau
Senior Vice President, Group General Manager
Time Inc.
Dan Horowitz
It's less about buying traffic than it is about reaching the right people with relevant headlines to get them to your content.
Dan Horowitz
EVP and Senior Partner
Fleishman-Hillard Digital
Katrina Craigwell
Our goal is always to deliver content that adds value to the conversations being held by the end user. Outbrain allows us to do just that.
Katrina Craigwell
Global Manager of Digital Marketing
Bailey Foote
The fact that we’re able to drive these kinds of transactions with consumers at scale and with increasing efficiency has made Outbrain paramount to our marketing strategy.
Bailey Foote
E-commerce Manager
The Line
Neal Moore
You cannot leave it to chance that someone will find and engage with your content. Outbrain can put your content in the midst of the world’s most prestigious publications.
Neal Moore
Zach Zavos
Having links to our content appearing directly on premium publisher sites helped us establish our brand.
Zach Zavos
Conversant Media
Mike Brito
Outbrain is one of those [critical] components helping us deliver the right messages to the right contingent at massive scale and in real time to counter a crisis.
Mike Brito
Group Director

A global footprint of service

We operate offices in 11 global territories and we partner with publishers and marketers in over 55 countries, including the U.S., UK, France, Brazil, India and Japan. Come join us ›

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>