Reps. Eric Cantor and Joe Wilson Introduce Resolution Honoring Tea Party Protesters

You're so gun-ho for getting Bush and Cheney how about ACORN and their constituents for busing in people to MN and throwing the election of Franken and Coleman?????? But anything is alright with you as long as it goes left.

finally "they" are erasing my posts.
and are all facts.

Nice try, cant censor buster

OH BUSTER YOU POOR ANGRY IMPOTENT LIBERAL..

Since 9/12 people like the teabaggers have constantly been belittled by liberals. It is nice to see that someone in Congress respects those who have the courage to stand up for traditional American values. I expect them to have plenty of company during the 2010 elections.
Maybe our constitution isn't yet dead.

Viagra for a Liberal Democrat (now called a Commie, Progressive, Marxist or liar), is called:

OBAMA MONEY or WELFARE. If you are one of the lefties above and addicted to 'Obama Money' - Don't ask where Obama gets his money unless you speak Chinese. He and his Marxist Messiah Disciples first stole and wasted all the taxpayer's money and now must beg their Commie Buddies for more - that no one can possibly pay back - even if they live for 1,000 years.

Care to enlighten us on your accusations Lizzie? Just how would a busload of anybody change the election between Franken and Coleman? You have to be registered to vote in Minnesota and in order to vote in Minnesota you have to be a resident and must prove so at the polling stations. Are you accusing the election judges in Minnesota of misconduct? Are you accusing either party of illegal practices? Are you accusing the State Supreme Court of ignoring evidence? If you are then show us the evidence you have to support your charges-I'd especially like to hear the evidence about ACORN busing people in to throw the election-that would be good humor. If you have no evidence, I have to assume you're no better than any other republican who doesn't know how to tell the truth, let alone recognize it.

It certainly isn't a coincidence that buster is a liberal. What is disturbing is that he may be the liberals brightest representative. He's got HeinyWart, Guppy, and Pundip by several points, and that is significant when the buster's score is under 50.


God Bless the Tea Party Protestors!!!! I met some great people out there.

The resolution declares that "the fundamental American principles of limited government and personal liberty are under direct assault"

...by 70,000 Fuax Fed & led, well proven paranoid psychotic & other "Invisible" attendees...

1) http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/09/size-matters-so-do-lies.html 70K is not = 1.7M

2) Conservative bloggers who originally posted the 1997 picture have backed down!

Malkin, like some of her conservative cohorts, retracted the number she had attributed to ABC when the network chastised;

* FreedomWorks president Matt Kibbe, whose organization arranged the event, for inaccurately telling the crowd that the news organization had reported the crowd at 1 million to 1.5 million people!

* Malkin linked to the ABC story on her site, and changed her blog post headline to “Celebrating the 9/12 rallies; Turnout estimated at 2 million";

* Malkin "Update: How many?; FreedomWorks in error.”

Say Anything updated its original post to say that the picture was “of the wrong rally.” An accurate photo “clearly shows that (the rally) didn’t take place on the mall nearly as extensively as the image I mistakenly posted does.” Power Line took the picture down all together.

But because mistakes can still live forever on the Internet and many people who saw the photo on Facebook were unaware it was found to be the wrong picture, we decided to still rate it on the Truth-O-Meter. And Pants on Fire it is.

UPDATED: We updated this item with new details about the Promise Keepers 1997 photos used on 9/12-13/09. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2009/sep/14/tea-party-photo-shows-large-crowd-different-event/ in 1997

@Lizzie re; MN; 3) Is a 312-vote margin "as close to a 'tie' as it gets?". Well, of course not. A 311-vote margin would be closer to a tie than a 312-vote margin, and a 310-vote margin would be even closer. Plenty of elections have been closer than Minnesota's, including the somewhat infamous New Hampshire Senate election of 1974, when the Senate actually did order a re-vote. In that case, different recounts yielded different conclusions, with the Democrat -- who had lost the Election Night count -- winning the first recount by 10 votes and the Republican winning the second recount by 2 votes. Two votes is a heck of a lot closer to a tie than 312. http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/06/minnesota-supreme-court-rejects.html & h ttp://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/04/when-does-close-become-too-close-to.html

LOL Buster at the Teabagger's Roadie OD Buffet!

THEY KEEP ERASING my POSTS!!!
So TRUTH....you met some great people at teabag parties.

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

what did you do, exchange size 58 jeans, then see who can hitch them up the highest?

It is impossible for me to have the same beliefs as a guy standing next to me with 50 tea bags STAPLED to his confederate flag ball cap.
and yes your RED,White, BLUE CROCS look good.
haaaaa

buster
3:28PM Oct 27th 2009

I'll provide the drinks..."iced teabags!"

HTC Minnesota said two weeks ago they have found voter fraud and are investigating. They found ties between Acorn and Franken. They said if proven, Franken may be recalled.

If you were alive when America was becoming a nation you would have stayed in England. Definitely. You obviously have no idea what principles America was founded on. Please, read anything written by the founding fathers and tell me if your ideals about government match any of theirs.

Hint - They do not.

Really Rob I am flattered that you think i would have such a huge influence on our country's founding, however I don't think my opinion (and you have no idea what that opinion is) would have been the deciding vote.
No where in my comment did I say anything about the beliefs of our founding fathers, what our country was founded on, or my opinion on how our government should operate.
All I did was comment on the hypocrisy of the republican party. What the party claims to be for versus what they actually do are two very different things.

Well there was the opinion that the past administration was seeking to destroy our country, I doubt the founding fathers would disagree.