The Big Question: How Much Do You Have to Agree with a Candidate's Stands?

2 years ago

0 Comments Say Something »

Text Size

Contributing Editor

Ever since activists and leading politicians on the right shook up the congressional race in upstate New York by endorsing the Conservative Party candidate over the Republican, there has been much discussion in GOP circles about whether it is better to win with a moderate or make sure that the party's candidate holds true to particular policies and principles.

A CNN/Opinion Research poll conducted Nov. 13-15 reveals a different outlook on this choice between Democrats and Republicans.

Fifty-eight percent of Democrats say they would rather nominate a candidate who has a good chance of beating a Republican even if they don't agree with him or her on some major issues than choose someone with a poor chance of winning. Thirty-eight percent disagree and 4 percent have no opinion.

On the GOP side, 51 percent said they preferred a candidate who agreed with them on the issues while 43 percent favored someone who could beat the Democrat. Seven percent were undecided.

Filed Under: Democrats, Republicans, Polls, Poll Watch

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.