Speaking out for the first time, Tareq and Michaele Salahi, the reality-TV-show aspirants who gained entry to a White House dinner without an invitation, appeared on NBC's "Today" show Tuesday morning to insist they did nothing wrong.
The couple wore black clothing and looked somber during their interview with Matt Lauer, but did not produce evidence that they were invited to last week's state dinner, though they said they had "documentation" they would provide to the "Today" show very soon, in a second appearance in New York. Click play below to watch video of the interview:
Lauer did not ask the couple, who were in Washington, if they would show up at Thursday's House Homeland Security Committee hearing, where they have been asked to testify. He also did not ask if they ever received the formal cream-colored invitation to the White House dinner or submitted the basic information all White House visitors must provide: their date of birth and Social Security number.
Tareq Salahi said the controversy surrounding their appearance at President Obama's first state dinner was "the most devastating thing that has happened to us."
He said, "We did not party crash the White House" and he revealed that the couple is "cooperating extensively with the U.S. Secret Service." He insisted they were invited to the event honoring the prime minister of India and his wife.
"We will continue to cooperate and the truth will soon come out."
Michaele Salahi said the fallout from attending the dinner was "unbearable to go through." Her husband said their "lives have been destroyed." Mrs. Salahi said that "everything we worked for" has been "destroyed." The Salahis have been portrayed as craven party crashers and Washington social climbers. "We were invited," Mrs. Salahi said, adding she would not have the "audacity" to crash a party she was not invited to. The couple bragged about being at the state dinner on their Facebook page, posting pictures of themselves posing with Vice President Biden, Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and others.
As the segment closed, Mr. Salahi said, "I am certain we will be completely exonerated" and indicated he was not done milking the controversy. "We are looking forward to coming to see you, Matt."
Since there had been chatter about the couple trying to get paid for their appearances, Lauer asked about that at the beginning of the interview, and the couple said they were not paid to appear on "Today."
Also interviewed on the morning show -- to discuss Obama's Tuesday night speech to announce a troop increase in Afghanistan -- was White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, who scoffed at Tareq Salahi's comment that the couple had been cleared to attend the state dinner.
"They were not on a list here at the White House," Gibbs said. They were "told on a number of occasions they did not have tickets for this dinner." Gibbs noted they may face criminal charges and that the White house will be doing "anything humanly possible to make sure" party crashers do not succeed in the future. This week, the White House is kicking off a series of holiday parties with thousands of invited guests expected.
As for the Salahi suggestion that there was a misunderstanding, Gibbs said, "You don't show up at the White House as a misunderstanding."
Meanwhile, the Washington Post is reporting that a "top Defense Department official traded e-mails with the Salahis in an effort to get them into last week's White House state dinner, according to sources familiar with an investigation into the security breach. On Friday the couple turned over copies of the e-mail exchange to the Secret Service investigators," the paper said. The official, Michele S. Jones, the White House Liaison in the Defense Department, denied that she had anything to do with clearing the couple to attend the party and said she informed them she was not getting them in.
In a statement released by the White House Jones said, "I did not state at any time, or imply that I had tickets for ANY portion of the evening's events. I specifically stated that they did not have tickets and in fact that I did not have the authority to authorize attendance, admittance or access to any part of the evening's activities. Even though I informed them of this, they still decided to come."
In an interview on NBC's "Today" show, Tareq Salahi, right, denied he and his wife, Michaele, center, crashed the Obamas' first state dinner at the White House last week. Here, they greet President Barack Obama at the dinner on Nov. 24.
Lynn Sweet is a columnist at PoliticsDaily.com and writes the Daily FLOTUS blog on Michelle Obama. She is also Washington Bureau Chief of the Chicago Sun-Times.... more
Democratic strategist Lanny Davis says President Barack Obama's openness before the House Republican conference in Baltimore was "his finest public moment since he became president."
"If only he...
The produce used on the Food Network's Jan. 3 Iron Chef of America two-hour special White House show was billed as being from the White House garden. But the show did not disclose that "stunt double...
Michaele Salahi , the infamous White House state dinner crasher, is getting hair extensions Friday at the Roche Salon in Georgetown in Washington, D.C. The sighting of the striking blonde by another...
I can't decide what is more embarrassing - the WH twisting itself into knots trying to explain this or the public's fascination with the story. Hard to believe the couple arbitrarily showed up and talked its way past multiple layers of security. Someone knows something; just tell the truth and let's move on to the really important news, like what's with Tiger and the mrs.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (37)
Stella
9:37AM Dec 1st 2009
With all of the clowns INVITED to the White House, it makes perfect sense that this couple WERE ALSO INVITED. Obama, give us what you promised--TRANSPARENCY in the White House. Over 500 lobbyists were involved in the crafting of the "health care reform" bill. Yet, we were promised NO LOBBYISTS. This is the most corrupt administration we have ever had, and now they are too proud to admit someone up there screwed up yet again and invited this couple.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (26)
sifjr
11:01AM Dec 1st 2009
I think a breach in security at the white house no matter who is president is more important that what [...] is going on with Tiger Woods and his wife!!!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (21)
Steve
1:50PM Dec 3rd 2009
Thanks for the laugh. I don't believe the Secret Service would do a mea culpa if the couple were on the guest list. They lied to get in and now want to lie to get out. Heck, I would have let her in, but not him. Oh well, so it goes. Now back to the real news: hockey player hit by a stick (wow, that's never happened before); Oprah going for more money elsewhere (amazing); and, yes Tiger got in a car accident and might have chased a little tail.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (9)
bapstko
2:19PM Dec 1st 2009
Haaaa....too funny...on the real though!!!!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
Ike
9:07AM Dec 1st 2009
Are these idiots 15 minutes up yet?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (52)
kathryn
9:11AM Dec 1st 2009
this us secrect service was not invented by the white house or obama???? obama cant do everything even though he is trying, u want him to run the country and try to keep himself safe as well????
RATE THIS COMMENT: (21)
jgoetz9174
9:21AM Dec 1st 2009
Their name, especially his, Tareq Salahi, somehow rings a bell in my mind. Is their any other social or political information about these folks?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (6)
rutross
11:28AM Dec 1st 2009
Salahi is a Palestinian National and friends with Khaladi...the Palestinian that was one of the accused "terrorist pals" in the 08 campaign for President. Khaladi speaks out against Israel and is pro Hamas. Salahi sits on some boards with Khaladi and has been photographed before with the Obamas. They definitely knew each other...don't know if they were actually invited to the WH but there is a lot of posturing going on here.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (19)
geramrt9
9:21AM Dec 1st 2009
Its all about the last name Salahi, think about it
RATE THIS COMMENT: (21)
Hattie Crabtree
9:28AM Dec 1st 2009
The news ticker at the bottom of one news channel said that the Obamas are angry about the breech of security.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (5)
monkeydad3a
9:33AM Dec 1st 2009
They need to be charged with a crime.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (27)
Sexy
1:02PM Dec 1st 2009
Send them to Riker's, why could'nt this happen to a couple you does'nt seek money or 15min. of reality tv fame.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
Mary Scirdinsky
9:42AM Dec 1st 2009
It was a publicity stunt and photo op. Bet whole thing was staged. Bravo owned by NBC Universal, GE's Jeffrey Immelt headman, he was at dinner also. NBC gets first interview. 2 plus 2 is adding up to staged. Shame agents will suffer the fallout.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (17)
bbnfaz
9:46AM Dec 1st 2009
They are at it again ! Someone in the Obama camp orchestrated a scam in order to justify the formation of a "Palace Guard", a neucleus for a "brown-shirt" military to ostensibly protect Obama.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-12)
wowvirgo
9:49AM Dec 1st 2009
I'm curious as to why Matt didn't ask them important questions? Again, I believe it's the liberal media who soft-touches everything in the news. Matt, a word of advice.....if you're going to do an interview, ask some tough and relevent questions!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO suger coating crap. It just shows to the viewers everyone on the Today show is liberal and will ONLY hammer people they disagree with....usually conservatives. The Today show is basically like Entertainmet Tonight and the National Inquirer. It's Pathetic to be considered a news organization.
RATE THIS COMMENT: (18)
Gary
10:31AM Dec 1st 2009
More like the "Ladies Home Journal" of news...where they interject politics in an oatmeal cookie receipe!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (10)
Pam
11:28AM Dec 1st 2009
Why would any Liberal who supports our President want a breach in White House security? We want to protect our president from crazies like you!
RATE THIS COMMENT: (1)
Jackie
12:16PM Dec 1st 2009
(Replying to wowvirgo) Let me guess... You think FOX News is fair and unbiased, right?
RATE THIS COMMENT: (-1)
brunonolan
12:40PM Dec 1st 2009
Ask them REALLY TOUGH questions like "What newspapers do you read?"