White House Correspondent

If you didn't know, Google's motto is "Do No Evil." China doesn't have anything in the way of a semi-biblical-post-modern credo, as far as I know, but if it did it would probably go something like: "Do No Evil . . . Unless It Will Protect the State."
Given these not-necessarily compatible codes of ethics, it's not surprising that Google, behemoth of the West, and China, behemoth of the East, have
locked horns in spectacular fashion this week.
Google has a history of battling with the Chinese government on censorship issues, and this week news broke that (presumably state-sanctioned) hackers from China made a targeted attack on Google with the aim of hijacking the accounts of Chinese human rights activists, as well as launching cyber attacks on several U.S. companies. In response, Google has threatened to pull its Chinese operation -- effectively snubbing one of the world's most coveted markets. Economic experts say the move is both unprecedented and unlikely. Human rights activists have applauded the move as U.S. business finally standing up to the Chinese on human rights. But what about the Chinese human rights activists themselves?
Having traveled to a fair share of states run by repressive and/or illegitimate regimes, I can attest to the importance of G-mail. Seen by activists inside closed countries as one of the few, relatively safe portals for e-mail correspondence because of the fact that it's hosted overseas and thus has extra encryption, G-mail has been a communication and information lifeline for countless numbers of freedom fighters and human rights defenders. G-chat, another Google feature, is perhaps even more critical -- allowing activists to rapidly communicate in times of duress. Twitter, while an important digital tool in places like Iran, is unavailable in many other parts of the world -- especially those with heavy-handed regimes bent on censorship.
My first thought when I heard this news was one of optimism: few institutions dare stand up to China, especially in its own back yard. But that optimism was ultimately tempered by a shot of reality: if Google pulls out, then who will be left?
It should be noted that Google's market share in China was never all the company had hoped it would be. Google ranks behind Chinese-owned Baidu as China's leading search engine, though Google still manages to turn an annual profit of $300 million. The economics of the decision are more nuanced than a simple black-and-white "Do No Evil" motto would suggest, but the repercussions are stark. One of the great -- and important -- reasons it's necessary to have the Googles of the world on the front lines of censorship is precisely because they're ones who can best fight the battle. Google has leverage that few others do, and it's willing to fight a war that most others will not. A departure from the Chinese market might land a crippling blow to the same do-gooders Google has been trying to protect all along.