SAN FRANCISCO -- "No cuts! No fees! Education should be free!"
That chant was shouted in every corner of San Francisco State University's campus on Thursday. Later in the day, demonstrators yelled it into their loudspeakers as they marched through downtown San Francisco and into Civic Center plaza.
The events were part of the March 4 "Day of Action" long planned by supporters of California's public education system. The state's record budget deficit (a $20-billion gap this year, coupled with $60 billion from last year) has dramatically impacted all levels of public education in California, from the elementary to graduate level, resulting in crippling spending cuts that have convinced many that drastic reform is needed.
Last fall, the University of California and California State University systems both announced tuition rate increases of more than 30 percent, and in addition to the fee hikes, university staff were furloughed and course offerings were cut. California's community college system has not been spared, either. And the budget pain is not specific to just higher education. The San Francisco Chronicle notes that according to the California Teachers Association, "school districts across the state have issued nearly 19,000 pink slips to public school teachers, warning that they may lose their jobs at the end of the semester."
Rallies, picket lines, walkouts and other demonstrations took place at all 23 of the CSU campuses and many of the CU campuses on Thursday. In the Bay Area, protesters eventually merged for one big rally at the Civic Center plaza.
While the protests were considered to be peaceful overall, there was disagreement among the groups of participants about what protest methods were most effective. A number of UC and CSU campuses reported that some protesters engaged in varying degrees of aggressive or destructive action, which was criticized by fellow activists as counter-productive. For example, the Golden Gate [X]press reported that an estimated 150 protesters at SFSU attempted to block a main intersection on the edge of campus as members and allies of the California Faculty Association (CFA) peacefully picketed alongside the same street. The account of the situation continues:
CFA organizers, who had issued a statement of non-violent, peaceful protest for the event, urged the group to clear the street. A CFA representative said the group who marched into traffic was not a part of the organized picket line.
"Students are angry and upset," said Sheila Tully, vice president of the executive board for the SF State CFA and an SF State lecturer. "They're exercising their free speech rights, but what I've told some of them is that when they do things like (block the street) the tactic becomes the news story and you lose the message."
While this instance of escalating protest tactics ended peacefully, others resulted in police clashes and property damage. At UC Santa Cruz, protesters smashed the windshield of a car because the driver chose not to engage with them. Perhaps the most notable clash was the occupation of Interstate 880 in downtown Oakland, which temporarily shut down all lanes during rush hour. According to the San Jose Mercury News, "as many as 150 people" were arrested, many of whom were detained by riot police. A report from the San Francisco Chronicle noted that "one protester was taken away in an ambulance after either falling or jumping from the freeway onto a tree and a roadway about 25 feet below. . . . The person's condition was unknown."
As the day drew to a close, some protesters at San Francisco's Civic Center yelled out, "March 5! Don't stop the fight!" Whether Californians continue this movement and make real their intent to reform the system from within or with their vote remains to be seen. But it is clear that California's public education system, and the state budget that helps pay for it, is broken and must be fixed.
Click play below for a slideshow of "Day of Action" protest photos taken by Frances Tobin at SFSU and San Francisco's Civic Center plaza:
In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.