Supreme Court Strikes Down Law Banning Animal Cruelty Videos

3 years ago

0 Comments Say Something »

Text Size

Correspondent

Calling it a free speech issue, the Supreme Court struck down a federal law banning videos showing graphic violence against animals.

In an 8-1 ruling Tuesday, the justices rejected the government's argument that certain categories of free speech should be weighed against societal costs, The Washington Post reported. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, called the law overly broad and said it was not allowed by the First Amendment.

"The First Amendment's guarantee of free speech does not extend only to categories of speech that survive an ad hoc balancing of relative social costs and benefits," Roberts wrote. "The First Amendment itself reflects a judgment by the American people that the benefits of its restrictions on the Government outweigh the costs. Our Constitution forecloses any attempt to revise that judgment simply on the basis that some speech is not worth it."

The 1999 law was aimed at forbidding sales of fetish "crush videos," which depict small animals being crushed to death by women with stiletto heels or their bare feet.

But the case, United States v. Stevens, had nothing to do with crush videos. The law was used to prosecute Robert Stevens of Pittsville, Va., who was convicted and sentenced to three years in prison for videos he made about pit bull fighting.

Animal rights groups and 26 states had joined the Obama administration in support of the statute.

Justice Samuel Alito was the lone dissenter.

Filed Under: Supreme Court

Tagged: animal cruelty, AnimalCruelty, Daily Guidance, DailyGuidance, Supreme Court, SupremeCourt

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.