Republicans Want FBI Investigation of Bill Clinton, White House, and Sestak Offer

I think one small change to your article would be: Americans (not just Republicans) want these matters investigated. If this is the way it has always been done, then politicians have been ignoring our laws for too long. Time for a change. Why should the voters be denied a choice of candidates by the entrenched politicians who believe it should be their choice? We want integrity, we want all who desire public service to have the chance to serve.

So let me see if I understand this, we have laws on books which makes this illegal. Yet the defenders are saying everyone does this in Washington. Why do we have these laws?

Sestak when he announced it said... Someone in the WH offered him a job. Then after the election he clams up ...took that long for them to scam a kinda believeable story... The WH ... Clinton is not part of this WH. if it had been Clinton I think he would have said another higher dem offical...so, why such a secret if it had been clinton why didnt he just say so if there wasn't any wrong doing? I don't think I have ever seen such spin and shift that this admin. has done and still doing.

It doesn't matter which side of the aisle does something considered illegal, this should be investigated. Obama was the one who claimed this administration would be transparent. All I have seen is dishonesty, bribery (healthcare), tax evasion (Rangel, Geitner), cover-ups, and constant flipflopping and outright lies. If the Bush administration did something wrong then they need to be investigated as well. We as Americans want honesty and integrity brought back to our government. How can the government go after others when they are guilty of many of the same things they are prosecuting others for? If we had evaded taxes like Rangel has, we would be fined and jailed, where is the investigation into this man who is on the powerful Way and Means committee?

I don't know about Republicans but this Independent wants an investigation of this matter. I don't buy the excuse that "this is normal politics" in Washington. If it is politics as usual, why do we have LAWS AGAINST IT?

If he wasn't offered the Sec Nav job you would think Sestak could have said so, then clamed up about what he was offered.

The cover up is usually worse than the crime. And so will it be in this case. A little hint to democrats, if you're looking for a credible witness to complete the cover up scenario you design, I don't think Slick Willy is the way to go.

So do quite a few Democrats. How do you like Obama's "transparency" and "change"? It only took 3 months to address the issue....

I was content to pass on this as government de rigueur until the WH explanation came out. (de rigueur used for our democratic readers as they love all things french) However the suggestion that Sestack might be willing to pass on a Senate run for an unpaid position/job/occupation/career/trade/slot/appointment/vocation/whatever is an condenscending insult to the public. If the WH wanted an investigation this was precisely the way to go about begging for it.

Americans deserve to know the truth of what happens in the White House. It doesn't matter if you're a Dem or GOP and it's the media's responsibility to report the truth.

Media bias is totally out of control and it's wonder why there are any news stations or newspaper existing.