AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
reliable operation, and mitigate or remediate the consequences of the potential disruption, of covered critical infrastructure."Cyber attack why don't they focus on an Iran Nuke attack?
June 04 2010 at 2:35 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyAnother disaster in the making with this bill!
June 04 2010 at 2:30 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplySounds to me like we have a lot of people commenting on a bill they haven't read yet.
Tsk. Tsk.
It would be interesting if we had a major cyber attack happen right now.
I wonder how many of you would be singing a different tune when you realize after the system is completely screwed from the attack. How many would be crying about the government not doing enough to protect them?
You know, kind of relates to how everyone blames Obama for the private sector oil spill. Less government, then a disaster happens, then everyone cries wondering why the government isn't doing enough. You people can't have it both ways.
Technically speaking who determines what is a "critical system" and how is it protected by having the gov't seize control of the entire Internet? The bill presumes that the Gov't can protect critical systems if it controls the entire net? That I got to see. The current Internet design is wide open to security attacks of all types. They can't protect critical systems without putting them on a different net designed from the outset for security. This bill makes no sense except from a political standpoint of controlling content for political purposes at the whim of the president.
June 04 2010 at 11:41 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyInteresting...please copy and paste into your next comment where it says in this article or the bill proposed where they will control the entire net? Too funny.
I wonder how long you'll wait after you lose power from a cyber attack, that you'll blame the government for not doing enough?
This is a first step toward controlling free speech, or as Obama's crowd would say, "redistibuting" it"
June 04 2010 at 11:30 AM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyHow exactly does this interfere with free speech?
Help the sky is falling!
Why not design a different Internet for so called critical systems that is more secure?
June 04 2010 at 11:28 AM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyBecause said critical systems are in the private domain. Obviously most of these folks never heard of Russia's cyberattack against Georgia. ( No, not the one in the US).
June 06 2010 at 9:42 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyObama wants control of the Internet for fund raising purposes. For this bill to work the ability to seize control must also require the consent of a Fed judge similar to that required when wire tapping.
June 04 2010 at 11:26 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhat was it Rahm Emmanuel said about letting no crisis going to waste? Sounds like another government takeover to me. Crap, why not, look at all of the other takeovers this past year and a half; what's one more of our precious liberties being absconded by the government who is all knowing. We're like sheep being led to the slaughter.
June 03 2010 at 11:43 PM Report abuse Permalink +19 rate up rate down ReplyHope the government will be better prepared for this eventuality than it was with offshore drilling.
June 03 2010 at 11:24 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyBig brother marches on.....Orwell.......how right you were
June 03 2010 at 11:23 PM Report abuse Permalink +20 rate up rate down ReplyWhat would you do in the event of a cyberattack?
June 04 2010 at 1:25 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplySo... a bill sponsored by a Democrat and Republican senator is Obama trying to take overt the Internet?
How about we comment on the merits of the bill ( pros and cons ) without injecting the usual foolishness in the discussion.
Follow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners



Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
56 Comments