AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!U.S. Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff acknowledged tonight that he discussed three possible jobs with the deputy chief of staff of the Obama administration -- all contingent upon a decision by Romanoff not to challenge U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet.Romanoff said none of the jobs was formally offered, but said the only reason they were discussed with Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina was if Romanoff stayed out of the Senate race."Mr. Messina also suggested three positions that might be available to me were I not pursuing the Senate race," Romanoff wrote in a statement. "He added that he could not guarantee my appointment to any of these positions. At no time was I promised a job, nor did I request Mr. Messina's assistance in obtaining one."
During the last week the White House released its version of events: Rep. Sestak, a retired three-star admiral, was offered, through former President Bill Clinton, an uncompensated advisory board post in order for Sestak to agree not to challenge Sen. Specter. We are supposed to accept this account despite the fact that Sestak, in a February interview, said he was offered a high-ranking federal job in order to get out of the race.Not long after news leaked last month that Andrew Romanoff was determined to make a Democratic primary run against Sen. Michael Bennet, Romanoff received an unexpected communication from one of the most powerful men in Washington.Jim Messina, President Barack Obama's deputy chief of staff and a storied fixer in the White House political shop, suggested a place for Romanoff might be found in the administration and offered specific suggestions, according to several sources who described the communication to The Denver Post.Romanoff turned down the overture, which included mention of a job at USAID, the foreign aid agency, sources said.Then, the day after Romanoff formally announced his Senate bid, Obama endorsed Bennet.
The White House said that no job was ever offered to Romanoff and that it would be wrong to suggest administration officials tried to buy him out of the contest."Mr. Romanoff was never offered a position within the administration," said White House spokesman Adam Abrams.
Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Whoever solicits or receives . . . any . . . thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
I envision a two term limit for all elected politicians similar to the President. Along with that they should pay into social security, obtain healthcare the same way we do, and pay into 401 plans for their retirement. I don't think that the framers of our Constitution intended Congress to be a lifetime career. People should serve their two terms then return to private life.
June 04 2010 at 9:19 PM Report abuse Permalink +18 rate up rate down ReplyPoliticians all get doused with "Pam" cooking spray prior to settling in their positions in Washington DC. I think the president gets a double shot. That way, nothing sticks to them when the heat is turned up.
June 04 2010 at 9:17 PM Report abuse Permalink +14 rate up rate down ReplyThe subject of this article that Obama should come clean is silly. Come clean about what. No crime has been comitted. I hope that this bites the troublemaking Repubs where it hurts. Trying to gain political advantage this way is why we have a do nothing Congress. Why not spend more time trying to cure the problems facing our economy.
June 04 2010 at 8:10 PM Report abuse Permalink -20 rate up rate down ReplyTerm limits is the ONLY WAY to end business as usual in Washington.
June 04 2010 at 8:01 PM Report abuse Permalink +14 rate up rate down ReplyI agree we need term limits, but I am a bit afraid of that. As soon as a law like this was implemented, Congress would grant themselves 110% pensions at the end of their one term. Then the burden on the taxpayers would multiply a whole lot faster than it is now.
June 04 2010 at 8:37 PM Report abuse Permalink +11 rate up rate down ReplyIt is good to see a politician not knuckle under to business as usual in Washington. I hope that voters recognize the integrity here.
June 04 2010 at 7:55 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyObama needs to come clean on everything! How many behind-closed-door deals were made during the 2008 election? Where did all the money come from?
June 04 2010 at 7:46 PM Report abuse Permalink +16 rate up rate down ReplyApparently, most of the comments made by "no big deal" or "let's move on" people are coming from the Chicago area where such things are commonplace occurances. Mr. President, you're no longer in Illinois. Like the childrens tale goes,,"All the kings horses and all the kings men, couldn't put humpty dumpty back together again"
June 04 2010 at 7:12 PM Report abuse Permalink +12 rate up rate down ReplyI am from Chicago, where the State has been in a corrupt Dem stronghold for decades. One day the people might wake up. On the other hand, keeping them dumb in public education institutions might be one of the reasons Chicagoans keep voting for the same 'ol, same 'ol.
C
Its usually the "Cover Up" that gets you...remember Nixon?
June 04 2010 at 6:31 PM Report abuse Permalink +16 rate up rate down ReplyThis is a non-story. Both sides of the isle try to clear the field for their preferred candidates. This is being made out to be some uncommon thing when anyone involved in campaigns would understand it.
June 04 2010 at 6:04 PM Report abuse Permalink -23 rate up rate down ReplyWe ALL understand why they would do it. What you don't seem to understand is, we want it to STOP. You are advocating putting CHOICE in the hands of the powerful few, and taking it away from you. When there is only one name on the ballot, where is YOUR choice? If it has been done 1000 times in the past, that does not make it any more legal today.
June 04 2010 at 8:45 PM Report abuse Permalink +10 rate up rate down ReplyPrior to getting into the race I was led to believe that Romanoff had put his name in for the USAID position. If true, that would seem to provide sufficient political cover for any discussions. The Sestak spin wouldn't get past a coma patient so I don't see that one dying any time soon.
June 04 2010 at 6:04 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners



Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
351 Comments