AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
Haley, a state representative, was born in South Carolina to Sikh immigrants from India. Sikhism, which is now the fifth-largest religion in the world, originated in 15th-century India, in the Punjab region. Like many Eastern religions, it stresses a philosophical and meditative approach to religious practice and does not promote the idea of a personal God. As of this month, the item has been tweaked and now says:Truth: Nikki is a Christian. In her words: "I believe in the power and grace of Almighty God. I know, and have truly experienced, that with Him all things are possible. I have looked to Him for leadership throughout my career and will continue to do so as governor."
Brody asked Haley spokesman Tim Pearson about the shift in emphasis but said Pearson didn't answer directly. He said only that Haley "attends Sikh services once or twice a year in respect for her family."Truth: In Nikki's words: "My faith in Christ has a profound impact on my daily life and I look to Him for guidance with every decision I make. God has blessed my family in so many ways and my faith in the Lord gives me great strength on a daily basis. Being a Christian is not about words, but about living for Christ every day."
What's really sick is that the Knott-headed state senator insults Ms. Haley and all hell breaks loose. But he also insults the President of the United States and no one blinks an eye. Guess it happens so often anymore that it isn't news any more. God help us.
June 06 2010 at 6:35 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down Replyi thought you could choose any faith youwant in america.i have been to many churches in my time never been asked to leave any of them.how many christians only go to church a couple of times a year,namely christmas and easter.its more how you live your life with your faith than be a hypocrite about it.
June 06 2010 at 5:38 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyAnother strike against the state of South Carolina's politicians. When will it end? It seems as though they like the shock value because they don't seem to be embarassed about their "anything to win" tactics.
June 06 2010 at 12:51 PM Report abuse Permalink +8 rate up rate down ReplyPersonally, I could care less what her religious affiliation is, or even if she had no religious affiliation at all. What I do care about, is she going to be a good leader. Will she continue down the current path of the "Party of No," or will she work with others to make positive change happen?
This country does not need another elected official that is unwilling to compromise and make positive change. We need a candidate that can find the middle ground, which is where you find most Americans today.
Whatever happened of keeping politics away from religion. Now before everyone jumps on my back I am not athiest nor am i Christian. Personally I can care less what faith anyone is because it doesn't concern me. My concern is this however, since when does religion state if you can do the job you are elected for...IT DOESN'T. Everything in politics is God this God that. Just because you believe in God doesn't mean i'm going to vote for you. But I guess to the Jesus freaks its a big deal. So much for separation between church and state.
June 06 2010 at 12:44 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyOh Americans...
Politics, race, religion.
Find something better to explore.
Intoning Jesus Christ just to get elected is disgusting but something Republicans do with regularity.
June 06 2010 at 12:08 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyI would have respected her more if she had stuck with Sikhism. Most politicians who claim to be "christian" seem to be christian in only a superficial way anyways, and the ones who are hardcore christian aren't people I'd want in office.
June 06 2010 at 12:06 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyIt's a shame that politicians still must conform to the "normal" christian standards in order to get elected. Even unfounded suggestions that President Obama was a Muslim cost him serious points in his election. It makes you wonder if the GOP frontrunner, Mit Romeney the only Republican who stands a legitimate chance to win the 2012 presidency can win with his public mormon background.
June 06 2010 at 11:54 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI would like to know who is Palinm to pick anyone? If people cannot run on their own merit/experience. They certainly do not need a medling quitter like Palin to approve or disapprove. If any GOP candidate does not have the backbone to tell Palin and her Tea Bagbers to back off. They should not be wasting people's time/money to hold office. People in Nevada are beimng hoodwinked in two cases. One for US Senator and the other for Governor. In South Carolina for the Governorship pinning Religion over Politics. Palin obviously has no concept what the US constitution reads. Seraration of Church and State. Palin for all intence and purposes should fage away. Very far away............
June 06 2010 at 11:42 AM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down Replyget real........ get some clarity on seperation of church and state issue.
June 06 2010 at 1:48 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners





Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
35 Comments