Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

The Death of the Library: Read It and Weep

5 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
I walked into my local public library in London the other day and got a rude shock. All of my favorite librarians were gone. They'd been replaced by machines. Where the circulation desk once stood -- manned by a friendly soul with whom I'd chat about politics or the weather or the latest London Review of Books -- I now swiped my library card and pushed a button that said "borrow" or "return."

They'd also done some remodeling. This particular branch sits in an elegant 1930s building located in the garden of the house where the poet John Keats wrote his "Ode to a Nightingale." The main room -- once cluttered with books that literally spilled onto the floor -- now is a shadow of its former self. Rather than books, the main thing on display would appear to be tables -- artfully dotted around the room as if this were a café or the premier-class lounge for an airline. ("It's so bright even druggies wouldn't inject here," quipped a cynical online reviewer.)

And it's not just in the United Kingdom where libraries are morphing into something else . . . if not dying out completely. I've seen numerous articles about the demise of them in the United States, whether it's the closure of branches in Boston, reduced hours in Los Angeles, or the architectural makeovers that render library books merely decorative, as in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

According to a report by the American Library Association and the Center for Library and Information Innovation at the University of Maryland, more than 25 million Americans reported using their public library more than 20 times in 2008, up from 20.3 million Americans in 2006. Particularly in the wake of the economic downturn, more and more Americans are turning to public libraries for such things as job hunting or to seek government services and continuing education -- not to mention free books, DVDs and CDs. And yet, according to this same study, a majority of states report cuts in library financing.

In short -- much like the post office -- we seem to be losing these iconic communal institutions of our youth. And when we do keep them around, we repackage them along commercial lines as if that's the only way to make them palatable to the public. I took a walking tour around East London a month or so ago and happened upon a bright orange, modern structure with the word "idea store" spelled out in a colorful lowercase font across the entrance. "What's that?" I asked. "Oh, that's the local public library," the tour guide answered. "It's now called an idea store." (In a similar vein, librarians in my London borough are now called customer service experts -- with the term "library" added in parentheses. They are also required to wear badges that say "How Can I Help?" and -- according to one with whom I spoke -- can be fired if they fail to do so.)

The death of the library as we once knew it is a shame for many reasons. In my family, at least, the local library has always been a focal point for connecting with our community. Back when we lived in the States, our local library in Oak Park, Ill., hosted book clubs, art exhibitions, film screenings and discussion groups on topics ranging from local zoning laws to children with multiple allergies. When we moved to London four years ago, it was our local librarians who suggested that my husband and I read Zadie Smith's "White Teeth" as an introduction to this city's vibrant multiculturalism and who recommended the Lemony Snicket series to my son when he grew out of Harry Potter.

But lest you think I'm just nostalgic for the days of yore, when no one bowled alone, I think that there are also pragmatic reasons for preserving our libraries.

Let's start with the future generation. While the conventional wisdom these days seems to be "Who needs libraries when you have Google?," the truth is that Google is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to research skills. As Sara Scribner, a children's librarian in Pasadena, California, notes, "In a time when information literacy is increasingly crucial to life and work, not teaching kids how to search for information is like sending them out into the world without knowing how to read."

Among other skills she teaches her pupils are how to sift through different kinds of reference materials (e.g. books, online resources, academic databases), how to tell good online information from bad and how to save time by optimizing search terms. In a country where education reform remains an ongoing -- if unresolved -- priority, you'd think that teaching our children basic library skills ought to be paramount.

Libraries are also crucial for adults. I have a good friend who's a reference librarian at one of the major urban public libraries in the United States. Day in and day out, she answers an enormous range of questions on every subject under the sun from people from every age (from 7 to 70) and race and occupational and income group you can imagine. Some of these people don't speak English very well or are too old to be computer literate. They come to the library because, as she put it, "it's the poor man's university."

It shows inventors how to file patents. It provides information on how to become a citizen. It provides tax forms and voter registration materials and bus schedules for free. It answer's anyone's questions -- from how to remove a troublesome stain to how their elected representatives voted on abortion or tax reform or the regulation of financial markets.

My librarian friend reminds me that President Barack Obama obtained his first job after attending Columbia University by going to the New York Public Library. He used something called Job Search Central, which provides all kinds of databases, books, classes and books on how to find a job that is both suitable and desirable, how to start a new business, how to write a resume, how to prepare for a job interview, even how to look for a job if you've just been released from prison. And you don't have to buy a $5 latte from Starbucks to enjoy the privilege.

In short, libraries are vital to creating an informed citizenry that is the hallmark of any democracy. So what do we lose when we lose libraries? We lose a lot.

Follow Delia on Twitter.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.


Filter by:

I sincerely hope that libraries never ever close there doors because that would be the end of learning the truth about things. While the computer is nice there are no restrictions which means anybody can write about anything and pass it off for being true. That is what is called fiction in book stores.I find that people are basically lazy and look up information via computer and run with it never taking the time to see if it true or not. The book business is far better controlled therefore if is a better sauce of referrence if your looing for the truth. Thanks Benjamin Franklin for your very good idea may it live on.

June 10 2010 at 7:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply


June 08 2010 at 1:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

This is for technerds who think a library can be replaced by the Internet. A book is a rugged, portable, nonvolatile, ESD-proof random-access memory device requiring no power. Talk to me about e-books when there's an iPad that does all that.

June 06 2010 at 8:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

What happens when the libraries and the news papers are gone? Where will you go to get informative information to fight against the corporatist in control of your government if you can't afford a computer or to get on to the Internet.

June 06 2010 at 7:55 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

The libertarian Republicans are whopping it up about the news papers disappearing and next up the libraries. If it dosn'et make money in their so called Free Market it dosn't need too exist. If you can't pay for it you don't deserve it. We are living in the new gilded age. But they don't have a problem shipping your tax paying jobs that support schools and libraries to China becauase that is a free market use of capitalism. Funny, Hamilton would have seen it different.

June 06 2010 at 7:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

I also love libraries, yet find myself wondering whether the scholars of the middle ages didn't mist up a bit at the thought that Gutenburg's press would cheapen the whole experience, devaluing information by making it available to the masses without the efforts of the scribes in the Abbeys.

More and freer access to information for all people is better.

June 06 2010 at 6:04 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

I have volunteered at different libraries for years. They are still very vital in
the community. I currently work in the library book store where we sell good used books ( many of them current best sellers) for $3 to $5 each to avid readers who can no longer afford B & N. These books are all donated for recycling and are very much appreciated.

June 06 2010 at 5:56 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

I hope the writer's fears are merely alarmist worrying, because the existence of the public library system is one of the most positive uses of our tax dollars.

June 06 2010 at 2:40 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply

The death of the library may be more about the UK than in our well-read US city where I reside. Our voters passed a tax levy for our libraries, and our local libraries are heavily used. At my local county library, the parking lot is always full, and the internet-access computers are always in use. Many of them are being used by unemployed people looking for job opportunities. Our library always has at least four or five librarians on duty, so it's easy to get help with finding books and materials, reference help, and using the computers. The public libraries where I live are well worth the taxes we pay for them, and people here support our libraries.

June 06 2010 at 1:11 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Television did not replace radio, as fools thought it would. It just changed it. Internet will not replace libraries but some foolish politicians and school administrators think it will. Remember when we thought a pill would one day replace food, or that helicopters would replace automobiles?

June 06 2010 at 12:33 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>