Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Is the Tea Party Losing Its Strength?

5 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
What a surprise: The Tea Party is not as popular as it once was. That was part of the news contained in a Washington Post/ABC News poll released this week. (The other hardly shocking and bad-for-Democrats news: only 29 percent are inclined to vote for their current representative in Congress.) Fifty percent of the respondents said they hold an "unfavorable impression" of this conservative, anti-Obama, anti-government movement -- an increase from 39 percent in March (when the health care reform slugfest was under way). Those with a favorable view dropped from 41 to 36 percent, and those folks with no opinion fell from 20 percent to 14 percent. Put this all together, and it appears that the more Americans see of the Tea Party, the less they like it.

This makes sense. At first, the TP movement could be seen as a patriotic uprising with a time-tested and honorable moniker. And its original target was President Obama's health care overhaul -- a controversial move that many voters, independents especially, were wary of. But in recent weeks, the -- shall we say -- excesses of the Tea Party have been on display.

When Rand Paul won Kentucky's Republican Senate primary, he proudly declared, "I have a message from the Tea Party: we've come to take our government back." Paul, now the closest thing to a national spokesman for Tea Partyism, in the next few days proceeded to round out the usual Tea Party message by noting he did not support all of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and by saying that he believed Obama's pressure on BP, the despoiler of the Gulf of Mexico, was "un-American." Paul was simply sharing his true desire for small-government. But his remarks revealed the not-so-pretty libertarian underbelly of the leave-us-alone Tea Party movement and exposed its fundamental bias against using government to combat such wrongs as corporate pollution or racism. He looked like a John Bircher of the 1950s -- yet he was reflecting the current sentiments of his people.

More Election Coverage
- Women Win Big in Key Primaries
- Tuesday's Real Winners and Losers
- 'Comeback Kid' Lincoln Survives
- Nikki Haley Heads for Runoff in S.C.
- Tea Partier Will Face Reid in Nevada
- Army Vet Alvin Greene to Face DeMint
- Reid, Angle Vulnerable to Ridicule
- California's GOP 'Thelma & Louise'
- The Power of Palin Endorsements
- So Much for Conventional Wisdom
- The Right Wins, the Left Loses
- Elections Boost Tea Party, Women

In Nevada, the Tea Party darling and GOP Senate candidate Sharron Angle called for abolishing the EPA, the Department of Energy, the Department of Education, and other agencies, and she proposed privatizing Social Security. Talking Points Memo reports that Angle is a supporter of the Oath Keepers, a right-wing group of soldiers and police officers who say they don't have to follow orders they believe are unconstitutional. She's also questioned whether alcohol should be legal. On Tuesday, Angle defeated Sue Lowden, a more mainstream GOP candidate, who earlier in the campaign suggested that Nevadans could barter chickens for medical services. (This Tea Party victory may afford Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid a much better chance of winning reelection in Nevada this fall.) Elsewhere, Tea Party activists have been calling for repealing the 17th Amendment, which provided for the direct election of senators. (Originally, the Constitution granted state legislatures the power to appoint senators.) Why would TPers want to do away with voting for senators? Supposedly, returning this authority to state lawmakers would weaken the power of the federal government and special interests. In reality, state legislatures are just as susceptible to special-interest lobbying, if not more so, and permitting state legislators to anoint senators would lead to extreme cronyism and oodles of back-room dealing. In other words, what the heck are these people thinking? Still, dumping the 17th Amendment has become a central tenet of Tea Partyism.

So is it any wonder that more Americans are now tossing the Tea Party aside? This inchoate, unorganized movement still has the ability to influence certain elections -- such as GOP primary contests in Nevada and Kentucky. But its reach may be severely limited. In California, the natural Tea Party candidate, state Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, failed to ride any Tea Party wave. Instead, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina rebranded herself a true-blue (or red-hot) Tea Partier on the way to beating DeVore and former Rep. Tom Campbell in the Golden State's GOP Senate primary.

As Tea Party extremism becomes more obvious, its gravitational pull on the 2010 elections may lessen. (Scott Brown? Who's that?) The Tea Party label might even become a liability for Republican candidates looking to win over independent voters in the general election. (See Fiorina.) If there is low turn-out for the November elections, the Tea Partier could still pack a punch. An angry mob has the most potential in a smaller setting. Yet if the trend continues -- more Tea Party candidates saying more Tea Party things -- Republicans may not want a refill.

You can follow David Corn's postings and media appearances via Twitter.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.


Filter by:
Viola Hamilton


July 14 2010 at 6:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

So Tea Party movement is simply a group of traditionally like-minded, morally & fiscally responsible and tax paying American patriots who have found their collective Voice.. and who demand that their own tone-deaf elected officials pay attention to their constituents.. ooh, that's scary, isn't it?

June 13 2010 at 5:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

people are waking up to the tea party

June 13 2010 at 12:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

What Tea Party???....they are Republicans!!!

June 12 2010 at 9:40 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply

Somehow I don't believe the tea party is losing its
strength.They won in Kentucky and now won in Nevada.
Look out November.This is a very weak article.

June 10 2010 at 8:46 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Your analysis is off the mark...Tea Party people are first and foremost fiscal conservatives. Government shall not live above it's means...just like the rest of us that live in reality must do.
Tea Partiers came together because of a run away government spending and lust for control along with an incredible lack of insight as to what this was doing to the future of the country.
The tea party people WILL become less important and driven IF the congress changes policies in this regard. If not the inevitable consequences of the fiscal irresponsible government will only drive the Tea Party way or another underestimating the grassroots call of the T. Party will be the liberals undoing....Although I must admit the libs are doing a pretty good job of self destruction by themselves....
Any way this will be a mute point after the midterms, remember these are only primaries...the real contest is liberal vs. conservative. I think the country is telling you that they have had enough of the liberal mindset for one generation

June 10 2010 at 5:23 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

The tea party is made up of media props who sat quietly for decades while big business and big government ruined the country. Now they are just getting concerned about problems which existed for the past 40 years. The tea party is just a reaction to media hype and misinformation being spread daily on cable news channels and the internet. If people had to document their claims and charges, the internet would be blank.

June 09 2010 at 11:57 PM Report abuse -7 rate up rate down Reply
Rob & Kathy

In a short time the Tea Party has become a force to be reckoned with. They can clearly have influence on national politics...

June 09 2010 at 11:18 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Every movement reaches a point of diminishing return. That is part of the natural evolution. Officeholding is not part of the movement's body. When the question comes forth: "What is next?" there is no response consistent with the movement's message. Either you become as corrupt as those you decry or you see your task as accomplished. Who would want to be like any member of the United States Senate or House of Representatives? Who would accept such a corrupt definition of self?

The Center for Responsive Politics had its beginning tracking oil money. Today, the most useful item is to track oil money in Washington. Nothing has changed.

June 09 2010 at 9:35 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Reid will disappear after November because a giant killer is here by the name of Sharron Angle. She rose from a humble begining, against all odds she prevailed on Super Tuesday and will again on November general elections. Angle is a great American story in the making.

June 09 2010 at 7:57 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>