Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Sarah Palin: Embracing Feminism, or Co-Opting it for Conservatives?

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
"Mama Grizzly" Sarah Palin is once again proving to be a thorn in the side of the feminist blogosphere, which has recently been invigorated by the debate over her co-opting of the word "feminism."
Since her ascension to the coveted status of one of the most visible women in American politics, feminists have engaged in a spirited discussion about Palin's impact on the progress of women's liberation. But her speech last month at a fund-raising breakfast for the Susan B. Anthony List -- a coalition whose goal is to elect female anti-abortion candidates -- has especially drawn the ire of many feminists because, among other things, she so eagerly and freely drew upon the words "feminism" and "feminist" ("no less than a dozen times" notes Feministing's Jessica Valenti).
At the event, Palin celebrated anti-abortion candidates and supporters and said that they embodied an "emerging, conservative, feminist identity."
Palin crowed about how the Right, and specifically the Susan B. Anthony List, is reclaiming the feminist movement and bringing it "back to its original roots." But, typical of Palin, this is empty talk: Lynn Sherr, a biographer of Anthony, and Ann Gordon, a historian who edited Anthony's papers, said as much in the Washington Post: "We have read every single word that this very voluble -- and endlessly political -- woman left behind. Our conclusion: Anthony spent no time on the politics of abortion. It was of no interest to her, despite living in a society (and a family) where women aborted unwanted pregnancies."
But this truth is probably too inconvenient for Palin and those who fill out her anti-abortion cohort.
What's more, the co-option of feminism by anti-feminists is nothing new. Amanda Marcotte of Slate points out that Palin is simply "the latest incarnation of a long and noble line of feminist anti-feminists: women who call themselves feminist but also object to the existence of the feminist movement and organize in opposition to it."
Around the time of Palin's Susan B. Anthony List appearance, Slate's Hanna Rosin tapped into the central question that has since encouraged much conversation: Is the Tea Party a feminist movement? In the article, Rosin points to Rebecca Wales, the spokeswoman for Smart Girl Politics, which identifies itself as " a grassroots organization that promotes the opinions and principles of conservative women." Wales, says Rosin, believes that the Tea Party "is a natural home for women because 'for a long time people have seen the parties as good-old-boy, male-run institutions. In the Tea Party, women have finally found their voice.' "
But I think Wales neglects to include the operative word that would make that statement more accurate: conservative women, rather, feel as though they have found their voice with the Tea Party. Because while women are poorly represented in American politics in general, the mainstream Republican establishment especially embodies the "good-old-boy, male-run institution" that Wales refers to.
The 111th Congress is comprised of a record number of women -- 95 -- but only 21 are Republican. In both the House and Senate, only 10 percent of Republican lawmakers are women, while roughly 25 percent of Democrats in the House and Senate are women. Neither party's record of electing women is anything to write home about, but clearly the Democrats are more willing to include and elect women, which is perhaps why conservative women have given up on the shrinking tent that is mainstream conservatism and embraced the Tea Party.
It's not just that the Republican Party has historically neglected to support and elect women that has drawn conservative women to the Tea Party movement. Indeed, several important events have converged over the past few years to bring about an atmosphere in which conservative female candidates -- many of whom have been endorsed by Palin, the de-facto leader of the Tea Party -- are the talk of the current political season. Of all of the cultural and political events that have brought us to this point, perhaps Hillary Clinton's candidacy was the main catalyst. (Would it be too cynical to suggest that Palin wouldn't even be a candidate for vice president were it not for Hillary?)
Take Rebecca Traister's observation on the Democrats' botching of Clinton's historic moment: She laments "the Democratic Party's sluggishness in celebrating the historic achievement of Hillary Clinton, its unwillingness to address the monumental nature of her presidential campaign or to acknowledge the often gender-inflected challenges she'd faced. What John McCain and Sarah Palin had done, brilliantly and terrifyingly, I thought at the time, was to move in on territory -- women, feminism, women's history -- that their opponents had been too reluctant to claim."
Fast-forward to today. As Traister feared, Palin has rather successfully attempted to capitalize on and co-opt "feminism" as she sees it. And many conservative women, who before Palin's breathtaking rise to fame might have remained largely unseen and unheard in the conventional Republican Party, are emboldened and are embracing her and the "mama grizzly" candidates she's endorsed. Without Palin's celebrity and the legion of fans she has strategically leveraged for political and financial power -- and many, if not most, it should be mentioned, of whom are women -- would candidates like South Carolina's state Rep. Nikki Haley or California Senate hopeful Carly Fiorina have gained the momentum they have?
Sadly, the cynicism that John McCain and the Republican Party employed when they nominated Palin to be vice president has only been renewed. As the mainstream GOP has failed to connect with voters, it has engaged in a calculated effort to "turn gender into a selling point," as the LA Times' Doyle McManus puts it. "Republican strategists say female candidates should run well this year, when voters are dissatisfied with incumbents of both parties, because women are, by definition, outsiders; they're not members of the 'old-boys club.' "
For feminists like Valenti, this GOP strategy is nothing more than "an empty rallying call to women who are disdainful of or apathetic to women's rights, who want to make abortion and emergency contraception illegal, who would cut funding to the Violence Against Women Act and who fight same-sex marriage rights."
Another question has arisen from Palin and the Tea Party's "feminist" power grab: Is it better to have a debate that is about the defining characteristics of feminism -- like, say, who "belongs" -- than to not have one at all? Says Kate Harding of Jezebel: "One curious thing about this 'new conservative feminism' is that all these women suddenly want to be known as feminists. Like it's a good thing! A desirable thing! A fashionable thing! When did this happen?"
This conversation is nowhere near finished. Ironically, in some ways Palin has ensured that the feminist blogosphere is more relevant than ever. The conversations we're engaging in have never been more robust -- and that can only be a good thing.
Filed Under: Abortion, Woman Up

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

245 Comments

Filter by:
shuff2562

Everyone is so upset the Palin doesn't believe in abortion. Shouldn't everyone be entitled to their own beliefs. So I take it from the tone of the article and the comments of so many of the individuals that if you don't believe in taking the life of another individual you cannot possibly be a feminist? I believe that Susan B Anthony's work was to enable woman to have a voice in the running of our great nation if we wished to. I don't believe in abortion except in the case where the woman's life is at risk or she was not afforded the opportunity to make a birth control choice (rape). In any other instance woman have the right and responsibility to take the necessary precautions so that they do not have to kill another person who cannot possibly fight back. I believe this makes me a feminist just one that takes responsibility for my actions as we all should.

June 24 2010 at 7:42 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
zebra365

I always thought that the feminist movement was about women having the opportunity to define themselves rather than be pushed into stereotypical roles. I think that the controversy over abortion eventually devolves into a religious issue and therefore is not a proper topic for government in a secular state. The only hint about this issue in the US Constitution is that citizenship is conferred upon a baby born alive on American soil. Citizenship is not conferred upon conception or upon a traveling fetus.

As for the Tea Party movement. I think it harkens back to the reason why there was an American Revolution. The main issue then was one of economics, the British Parliament felt it had the right to take property from American Colonists to do with as it pleased. This is an attitude currently shared by both Republican and Democrat politicians.

The Tea Party movement has to do with FISCAL conservatism. It embraces the idea that people can better determine how to spend their own money than can politicians. As social conservatives like Palin try to surround themselves with the Tea Party, they will kill it.

There is no political party today for people who are social liberals and fiscal conservatives, the Tea Party is filling that void. Palin is not one of us.

June 13 2010 at 2:18 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
boredwell

Palin, despite her gender, essentially upholds views we associate with good ol' boys. Haley, too, though a first generation American child of immigrants, supports Arizona's illegal immigrant law. The observation that "conservative women have given up on the shrinking tent that is mainstream conservatism and embraced the Tea Party" as a path to electoral success is interesting. One doesn't readily associate "feminism" with the conservative Tea Party. Yet if women are embracing the Tea Party in order to win office like California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman, then they are co-opting the "do whatever it takes to win" cynicism of the good ol' boys, too. Whenever the attempt is made to define a construct like "feminism" it becomes a shrinking tent term excluding "anti-" feminist women like Palin, Haley, Lincoln, Schafly et al. Feminists like politicians come in all flavors.

June 11 2010 at 3:43 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
oldengineera2

I thought the primary focus of feminism was not only a woman's freedom to choose a reproductive strategy, but also the freedom to use her own mind to lead her to political and economic policies independent of the pressures of others, including Frances Tobin's expectations for feminist philosophical rigidity.

June 11 2010 at 1:25 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
bach

So does left wing feminism and murder go hand in hand. Whether you want to accept it or not, a fetus is a living INNOCENT human, and to abort it is murder. So when protecting your right for abortion, keep in mind, it shouldnt be performed willy nilly.

June 11 2010 at 12:11 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
Rob & Kathy

oken112:29 AM Jun 11, 2010
You are right. NOW and liberals have not backed GOP women. However it is because of their politics, not because of their sex. 25% of Democrats elected to the house are women while only 10% of the Republicans in the house are women.
********
Thank you for proving my point. It exposes the hypocrisy of N.O.W. and liberals. They celebrate "intelligent and assertive" womnen. EXCEPT conservative women...

June 11 2010 at 12:11 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
srcathey

It appears the "feminist" movement is all about abortion. As I recall from the beginning, it's main purpose was to give a woman equality in a male dominated society. As is the case with all liberal's, they have scewed it to politics instead of helping women. If they were sincere about the movement, they would have supported her during the last election. Shame on them!

June 11 2010 at 12:03 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
madsarro

such feminine force should have come from the left. after all, the left perceives feminism as their bailiwick.
the left hangs its feminist accomplishments on abortion and hillary, and palin needs neither to survive the powerful role she created all by herself. palin makes liberal feminism oh so '70's. enough to drive a hard lefty girl to hysterical tears.

June 11 2010 at 11:08 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
pcprivatmail

Feminism has always been about choice - having more rights to them not fewer...

And the truth is that abortion has been an issue for women for hundreds of years. It's just that the former modern day version used to be performed in back alleys ' by butchers with dirty coat hangers' and the like. Almost needless to say, plenty of women without legal access to birth control or healthcare died as a result of predictable infection, or simply rendered infertile for the rest of their lives.

Sarah Palin and Carly Fiorina are not Feminists.

I went to high school with Carleton and I probably would have characterized her as a Feminist in the early 70's. I cheered her on when she took on HP and kicked breast cancer. I'm also a survivor.

I also bit my tongue when she championed Sarah Palin, aligned heself with the Tea Partyers, and launched the 'demon sheep' ad.

Not anymore. She has indeed changed and not in a good way, in my opinion.

And that's HER choice!

June 11 2010 at 10:58 AM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to pcprivatmail's comment
ernestvalerius

Is she as shallow as it seems?

June 16 2010 at 7:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
vivralafrance

She will adopt anything that keeps her in the limelight and promotes her personal agenda of acquiring fame, money, power, and celebrity. In the end, her legacy will be one of a selfish , self centered opportunist who is a quitter.

June 11 2010 at 10:53 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to vivralafrance's comment
Randy

vivra sounds like a good description of the tenants in the white house.

June 11 2010 at 11:03 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>