AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
According to the Guttmacher Institute, of the 123 million women birthing each year, only half are getting the full complement of prenatal, post-natal, and delivery care they need. "The direct health benefits of meeting the need for both family planning and maternal and newborn health services would be dramatic," Guttmacher materials distributed at the conference explained. "Unintended pregnancies would drop by more than two-thirds, from 75 million in 2008 to 22 million per year. Seventy percent of maternal deaths would be averted. . . . Forty-four percent of newborn deaths would be averted. . . . Unsafe abortions would decline by 73 percent."Nobody in human history has given more than the Gates family, from Aids to Education they have been at the forefront of helping others
June 15 2010 at 12:00 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyIt should be evident to anyone reading this article that abortion must remain safe and legal in the United States. In addition, our maternal death rate in very high for a civilized country. This is because of the profit motive. We focus our efforts on dangerous and unnecessary caesarian sections instead of simple, appropriate natural births with midwives attending. Let's take the birth process back from doctors and return it to women.
June 12 2010 at 9:19 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyWell said. By approaching birth from a medical and emergency point of view, we are getting corresponding results. It will improve not just maternal mortality statistics, but fetal mortality statistics as well (which are equally abysmal).
June 13 2010 at 10:16 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyHow about helping American kids, whohave telephones stuck in their ears everytime you look at them. I am so appallled at new phones and the money you make off of families as most do not have money to spend now on anything but food and shelter. Not phones. I love both of you kids and I am 75 so I see how the kids are begging for the new things. I just wish you would use better judgement with your money by helping the orphans in this country as we need an orpanage for thme.
June 12 2010 at 8:08 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyIt is difficult to get these funds to the people it is intended for. I went to Haiti a year ago (before the quake),on a missions trip to build a school. The Haitian government builds no schools. We also arranged for a ship container full of shoes to arrive so we could take it to a remote village. When the container arrived it was quickly confiscated (stolen) by the Haitian government and sold in the Dominican. We do not plan to go back.
June 12 2010 at 1:33 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyIt is more than lack of care... it is also methodology. America's maternal AND infant death rate correspond directly to the amount of technology and the high numbers of cesareans forced into a process that does not need to be manipulated as much as it is. It traces back to a lot of CYA in a hospital... for the insurance guys. Childbirth, as life, has a small amount of danger that is part of life. Yet, the USA's numbers continue to climb. We need to concentrate on giving every woman of any nation that one-on-one eye-to-eye, hand-on-belly care that is the key to safer birth. When that is accomplished, the needs of each woman are revealed, and they can be addressed in a unique way...as each woman and pregnancy is unique. A cookie cutter approach just is not and will not work. More machines and drugs and invasive techniques are not the answer. Pregnancy is not an illness, but the more it is approached as an illness, the more results we get that resemble an illness. It is a process, an extremely personal and private process. We are way off track in how it is handled, and until we can focus back on what it REALLY is, it will not come back on course.
June 12 2010 at 12:05 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyAnd to avoid adding to the THREEHUNDRED MILLION murdered, not for "health reasons" but for sheer selfishness, what do you suggest?
June 11 2010 at 8:18 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyAgree with additional maternal care, midwives, etc. but re abortion - What happened to the argugment that if we only legalized abortion, it would pretty much end women's deaths for unsafe ones??? I was a counselor at a pregnancy crisis clinic and a mom of 5 and know all about this subject. Some had to deal with women with postabortion traumas. We were upset how this was not talked about and known...from the proabortion crowd. So I appreciate that part in this article. I'm all for education about contraception, medical care, etc. but I must say I don't agree how that 90% could be stopped with that. That's naive and refusal to face reality/facts. That's not the root problem. My experience has been that even with the education, it will still happen because of human nature. It's the lack of will to practice morals and/or disrespect for God, life (when not a rape or something of course)....scared they will lose their boyfriends/husbands if they don't have sex and/or the fathers telling them to get abortions (a lot of that). More concern for that than the life of their "developing human being". That was our real-life experience and common sense. No, legalizing it does not help....it only increases them. I disagree passionately that it's not prolife to "deny" abortions - that's ridiculous and nonsensical. Most prolifers will agree it's different when the life of the mother is in danger - but that is RARE.
June 11 2010 at 7:32 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThe United States has the highest rate of maternal death in the industrialized world because of the pathetically poor, Third World, insurance run and insurance rationed health care system which gives the United States the worst health care in the industrialized world.
June 11 2010 at 7:29 PM Report abuse Permalink -6 rate up rate down ReplyIt's interesting how many causes there are which need to be addressed by the global community. I, myself, would probably not support this initiative because according to the numbers given in the article, less than one-half of one percent of women die during birthing each year. It is not possible to achieve 100% safety for every woman in the world giving birth, and a 0.3% mortality rate is just about as low as the percentage can get and still be realistic from a medical standpoint.
I also disagree with deaths from botched/illegal/unsanitary abortions being included in the mortality rate of mothers during childbirth. Abortion is an elective medical procedure, it is NOT a natural consequence of the birthing process. In fact, removing the number of women who die from abortion complications from the mortality rate for birthing mothers, the number of mothers who die from birthing complications drops to 0.23%, or less than one-quarter of one percent.
Of course, today I don't think anything makes a difference in this world. If I did, though, I would have to wonder what needed to be done to support unwanted pregnancy prevention... in every country in the world. Even this one.
Follow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
35 Comments