Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Maine Governor's Race: Another Test of the Tea Party Movement

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
One of the campaigns in which the Tea Party movement and conservative activists have reared their heads with initial success, and has not received the attention of some other similar races, is the contest for Maine governor in which Paul LePage, the mayor of Waterville and a former lumber and paper company executive, came out of nowhere to beat seven rivals for the GOP nomination. He swamped the closest contender by a 2-1 margin.

That has set up a race between the most conservative candidate in the Republican field against a distinctly liberal Democrat, state Senate President Elizabeth Mitchell. An independent candidate, environmental lawyer Eliot Cutler, believes he has a chance in the three-way race by staking out the middle ground between the two.

At the starting gate, LePage leads Mitchell by 43 percent to 36 percent, with 7 percent for Cutler and 14 percent undecided, according to a Rasmussen Reports poll conducted June 10. The margin of error is 4.5 points.

Elizabeth Mitchell, Paul LePageIf Cutler thinks he has a chance, he has his work cut out for him because LePage and Mitchell are far better known. Forty-six percent of voters say they don't know enough about him to be sure whether they hold a favorable or unfavorable opinion, compared with 16 percent for LePage and 10 percent for Mitchell.

LePage is drawing stronger support among fellow Republicans (82 percent) than Mitchell is among Democrats (67 percent). LePage leads Mitchell among unaffiliated voters by 44 percent to 24 percent, with 10 percent for Cutler and 23 percent undecided. Cutler is not making much of a dent among either Democrats or Republicans.

While none of the polls predicted a LePage victory, it probably shouldn't have been a surprise. In May, conservative activists along with Tea Party-related groups rejected the state GOP's proposed platform and replaced it with a document that embraced many Tea Party movement stands.

The race is to fill the seat of Gov. John Balducci, a Democrat who cannot run again because of term limits.

Follow Poll Watch on Twitter

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

227 Comments

Filter by:
aimcifer

I don't get he rage against the tea party movement. They are for smaller government (in other words, gov't the way it is set up in the US Constitution), more fiscal responsibility (not spending money like drunken sailors), and more freedom to the people. Paul LePage has acted very responsibly in Waterville, cutting taxes, cutting spending without compromising services, increasing the town's credit rating, and increasing the "rainy day" fund from one mil to ten million dollars. That is the leadership we need in Maine right now, in a big way. If we elect Mitchell, we'll get more of the same garbage that has been choking Maine for years.

June 14 2010 at 4:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
pmbalele

TEA party and other right wingers are now in trouble. They actually don't know what they stand for. These are people have been haunting President Obama on big government. However, now they are saying President Obama should have acted quickly on the oil spill. Specifically, they argue the federal government should have conducted environmental impact before allowing BP to drill the eruptive oil well. Let me tell them this: To conduct environmental study entails spending or paying somebody to do the job. That means President Obama could have incurred tax money which TEA party and right wingers do not like. What a double standard are TEA party and right wingers are? President Obama is right for taking steps so far. Fox News people and right wingers cannot have both ways. President Obama is right to take measured steps in the oil spill disaster. This should be a lesson to Fox News, TEA party and right wing not to criticize President Obama on issues they do not understand.

June 13 2010 at 11:56 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
dmgg711

Every election it is the same BS from the politicians. The more money that is behind these politicians the more that politician owes to their donators. It's a song that they should sing by Tennessee Ernie Ford "I owe my soul to the Company Store". Every politician makes promises but in the end the big money get their investments back 10 fold.
CORPORATE AMERICA VERSUS OBAMA
Paul Krugman columnist for
The New York Times/Excerpt:

It’s the same formula the right has been using for a generation. Use Identity politics to whip up the base; then, when the election is over, give priority to the concerns of your corporate donors. Run as the candidate of “real Americans,” not those soft-on-terror East Coast liberals; then, once you’ve won, declare that you have a mandate to privatize Social Security. It comes as no surprise to learn that American Crossroads, a new organization whose goal is to deploy large amounts of corporate cash on behalf of Republicans candidates, is the brainchild of none other than Karl Rove.

June 13 2010 at 10:13 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
edees100

bocabrad10:48 AM Jun 13, 2010 - ''It is sad that the tea-party people get any kind of control.''

bocabrad, you feel you are better then anyone else in this country? You feel entitled to look down on others, you feel humans are to be ruled by other humans? You are truly a sick individual.

The participation across this nation is healthy, natural, and required. More need to be involved, the neglect and apathy of Americans led to where we are today, with a corrupt 2-party paradigm that rules without us, legislated us away, and jcokeys for position to gorge on your labors and negotiate away your dignity and your liberty among the elite ''politicians'' and ''coporations''.

Tea Party is humanity, community, and participation. Tea Party is a spot on slice of the American demographic in terms of ideology, age, gender, race, and economic class. 4 out of 10 are self-proclaimed moderates or liberals, 4 out of 10 are democrats and independents, 5 out of ten are female.

So they are a little rough around the edges, they've got a lot to digest, a lot to learn, in a short amount of time. In the last 18 months, have you seen any violent incidents in the thousands upon thousands of events across the country with over 30-40 million Tea-Party attending, have you seen cities absolutely trashed as when Organize for America paid zombies flooded in and decimated and disrespected thier hosts? No. You saw commeradery and you saw the event locations cleaner then when people arrived.

At the rate the movement is growing, it will surpass the broken 2-party paradigm and be the largest movement in the nation by the fall of 2012.

Cutler is a progressive wearing democratic clothing covered up in a moderate cloak, from a past era advising the 2nd worst administration in history (Jimmy Carter). He's no moderate and you'd better look closely for warts, they are there.

June 13 2010 at 5:36 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
hermotimus

From everything I have seen in the news this past year. The Tea party Movement is doing exactly what the Christian Right Movement started to do 12 years ago, i.e. to force an agenda on the American people that meets their own ideological beliefs. We know the result of the work of the Christian Right and where it led this country under President Bush. I am concerned that we are about to face the same situation again with another such group and that will likely have a similar result on American politics and in turn on America as a nation and as a world leader. Majority rule may be the way in which America functions, but I am not sure that the majority is always right. It seems that far too many people vote for their personal prejudices rather than for what is best for the people of the this nation as a whole. The founders of this country firmly believed that an intelligent and well-informed electorate would vote in such a way as to ensure that America as a whole was given first priority over the prejudices and privileges of groups of individuals interested in controlling the Government for their own ends.

I think the American people need to realize that voting based on personal prejudices and personal beliefs, as a way to change this nation's course, is something that this nation cannot afford to continue doing. Our government has become largely dysfunctional due to this propensity of the American voter. The Government becomes less effective in protecting the people of this country from threats posed not only by foreign nations and terrorist groups but from our own corporations and banks that have manipulated Wall Street and our Environment for far too many years. The government of this country has failed to protect us. What is good for business and industry is not always good for the American People, as so many recent examples have shown us (the Gulf Oil Spill, The Wall Street Meltdown, The Mortgage Crisis, etc). We may not need a bigger government per se, but we do need an effective government that can and will protect the American people from those who do not care how much damage they cause this country and its people in pursuit of profit or their own personal agendas. It is time to live up to the expectations of the founders of this country and become a well-informed electorate that votes for what is best for the country as whole, and not as a way to advance a personal, religious, or group interests without regard to what is best for the entire 310 million!

June 13 2010 at 5:17 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
abcstarfox

Whenever a man casts a longing eye on office...
a rottoness begins in his character.
Thomas Jefferson

June 13 2010 at 3:09 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
wilkesgm

"It's the tea party which is the radical element here."............
Let me try to understand this. The founders of our country had specific ideas about what they did and why they did it. So, balanced power between the three branches, limited federal control, increased power to the states and reduced taxation, the foundational beliefs of our greatest minds, are now radical ideas - but fascist control of major industries is not. Since most of you lefties are barely literate, I need to instruct you before you have a seizure. The word "fascist" has a literal definition. It describes a form of government where there is a titual ownership of private property by individuals but the government has the power to dictate anything it wants, such as the recent take-over of General Motors, the banks, the student loan market, etc. It does not mean I am calling a name - it means that the people who did these things have behaved in a manner consistent with a specific definition.

June 13 2010 at 2:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jane

THE OLD SAYING IS "AS MAINE GOES .....SO GOES THE NATION!!!!! Look out all you Dems ...time is just about to run out!!!!!!1

June 13 2010 at 1:48 PM Report abuse +10 rate up rate down Reply
wilkesgm

"The American system of democracy will prevail until that moment when the politicians discover that they can bribe the electorate with their own money" - Alex De Tocqueville 1909"

Minor tweak - He wrote it in the mid-1830's. He was dead by 1850.

June 13 2010 at 1:36 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
Ardith

This sounds like a great step forward. We all have opinions, but we need to express them with courtesy. What good does it to to berate people who don't agree. Ben Franklin prefaced his opinions with a phrase like "It seems to me" or "to my way of thinking." The person who talked to him was not faced with a belittling comment and so he could listen and consider what was being proposed rather than getting his hackles up.

June 13 2010 at 1:14 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>