Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Abortion, Sarah Palin and Feminism: They're Complicated

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Ah, carry me back to old 1960s. Women's lib, as many of us called feminism back then, divided women along the same fault lines that divide us today.

Decades ago a friend said to me: "I always thought liberation meant the freedom to do what you wanted with your life, even if that was stay home with your children."

Pretty good definition, and it just about summarizes the abortion debate. Freedom to become a mother or not. Freedom to be born or not. When those two freedoms are in direct opposition, whose freedom should be honored?

The baby's, says Sarah Palin. "You thought pit bulls are tough," Palin said at a recent Susan B. Anthony List breakfast. " You don't want to mess with the mama grizzlies."

Grizzlies are fierce, all right, and they will kill for their cubs. (Actually, they'll kill for the hell of it, too.)

The world is all a-twitter about Sarah Palin and the word feminist appearing in the same sentence. New York Times columnist Ross Douthat wrote: "However much heartburn Palin's 'mama grizzlies' give to those who associate feminism with the policies and prejudices of American liberalism, circa 1973, they should recognize their emergence for what it is: not a setback for the women's movement, but a happy consequence of its victories."
Even Palin's detractors have to admit she's putting some spit and polish on the tarnished feminist brand.

Politics Daily columnist Patricia Murphy said on this week's Woman Up video that whether or not it makes them uncomfortable, the Democratic Party will have to make room at the table for pro-life Democrats. In other words, a diversity of opinion.

But columnist Bonnie Erbé countered that "of all issues, [abortion] is probably the single toughest to have a diversity of opinion."

Indeed. Abortion is a litmus test for candidates, and some voters choose a candidate on that issue alone. Sure, Palin is a charismatic, good-looking woman, but even so, her enormous popularity can be traced to her abortion stance: "I am pro-life. With the exception of a doctor's determination that the mother's life would end if the pregnancy continued. I believe that no matter what mistakes we make as a society, we cannot condone ending another life."

For some, abortion is more a religious than political choice, and not just among conservatives. A believer in the Wicca religion made this argument in "A Woman's Sacred Right to Choose":
. . . no one makes choices in a vacuum. The opinions of others, of partners and doctors and friends and respected mentors of faith all come into play. . . . Feminism, however, is not a faith with a catechism and a belief-test for entry. . . . I know women who hold widely varying opinions about abortion who still work stalwartly to advance the project of women's overall liberation.
Prior to Roe v. Wade, pro-life rhetoric was for the most part confined to Catholic clergy, lawyers and physicians. Once abortion was legalized in 1973, the issue became a rallying cry for conservatives, evangelicals and lay Catholics too.

This one law galvanized conservatives, once dubbed "the silent majority" by President Nixon. Suddenly these quiet men and women weren't so quiet anymore. (A side note: I've complained that ovarian cancer will never get the attention or research funding that AIDS got because polite middle-aged women will not behave like outraged drag queens. But I digress . . .)

The pro-life movement noted and adopted some of the more effective techniques of the groundswell fight against the Vietnam War. The pro-lifers began to gather strength.

The Declaration of Independence proclaims that all men are created equal, and they did mean men. To be specific, white men. To be more specific, white men who owned land. The Founding Fathers could not have foreseen to a day when America would be one of the most diverse countries on the planet.

Our winner-take-all elections reinforce the two-party system and all but guarantee that third parties will fail. Therefore it's in every American's interest to have the Democratic and Republican parties be as inclusive, diverse, reasonable and centrist as possible.

The more strong women in the Republican Party, the better. Even if a candidate's beliefs vary widely from my own, she still stands as a rebuttal against centuries of oppression. You can take the girl out of the Democratic Party, but you can't take the feminine viewpoint out of the girl, regardless of her stance on abortion.

I have never conceived, so I cannot know what I would have done if I'd faced an unwanted pregnancy. But Woman Up has plenty more to say on the subject: Eleanor Clift in Carly Fiorina vs. Barbara Boxer: The Sisterhood and Abortion Politics, Bonnie Goldstein in Does Each Woman's Uterus Belong to Us All? The Limits of Sisterhood, Sandra Fish in 'Personhood' Abortion Issue Is Back on the Colorado Ballot, Luisita Lopez Torregrosa in Feminism: The Belief That You Own Your Body and Are Man's Equal, Sarah Wildman in Melinda Gates Can't Run From the Abortion Controversy and Marjorie Dannenfelser in Pro-Life and Pro-Woman: Sarah Palin's Case for Authentic Feminism.

A few months ago we here at Politics Daily were wondering what makes a post appropriate for Woman Up, and we found there was no easy answer. Women clock in at just over half the world's population. You could more easily list the issues that do not concern us than the ones that do.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

58 Comments

Filter by:
LeftoverdjII

Ours is a secular society. We do not permit religious belief, wholly unsupported by reason, to dictate our laws. Make no mistake, the notion that a fetus is somehow a human being with rights superior to those of its unwilling host is a religious belief, and a recent one at that.

June 16 2010 at 3:58 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
punnster

Liberals say, "Do not execute murderers who have been tried and convicted. Execute babies with no trial." Do criminals have more rights than innocent babies? Just wondering.

June 16 2010 at 1:56 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
hairhofla

It has been a centuries old practice to control societies by controlling reproductive rights and practices..This has been the goal of the conservatives since the beginning of recorded history and the latest incarnation of religious Reich is no exception.It's time "society" extracts itself from women's privacy and allows her along with her family to decide what is best for her medical and spiritual situation.This is the true meaning of feminism

June 16 2010 at 9:52 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
telcomman1

Jones- life begins at conception. Science is science. Please exclude "quacks." Want proof? Once a single cell becomes two, it has changed on the molecular level, Simply put, it is connected to the host (mother) therefore is alive.

June 15 2010 at 8:45 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
trb2244

Finally: a sensible viewpoint on feminism and conservative politics. There are three words I never thought I'd put in the same sentence!

June 15 2010 at 8:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to trb2244's comment
ernestvalerius

Sensible, conservative, viewpoint; who would have believed?

June 15 2010 at 9:17 PM Report abuse -5 rate up rate down Reply
fknhippie

We should never go back to the dark days of women being forced to carry a child to term. women get raped beaten and pregnant against thier will. women get pregnant accidentally when they are hooked on drugs and dont realize it until its too late. abusers get women pregnant in an effort to force themselves permanently into their lives and with child custody and so called "fathers rights" the way they are today that is a terrifying prospect to any woman trying to leave her abuser. we cannot allow the laws to change there are more ways to die than physical and banning abortion will push many women back into the days of coat hangers black market clinics suicide or worse. DONT give up your right to choose and dont listen to politicians or churches that have no concept of the hell many women ACTUALLY go through.

June 15 2010 at 8:29 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
Connie

Please quit writing about Sarah Palin.

June 15 2010 at 8:29 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
pop

A woman's sacred right to choose.. Wow thats great... Even many states do not get to choose to inflict the death penalty. I guess a woman's sacred right even trumps that.

June 15 2010 at 7:59 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
lwilli1192

Where are you anti abortion people in regard to our country doing business with China. They are the biggest aborters in the world?

June 15 2010 at 7:30 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to lwilli1192's comment
ernestvalerius

There is a difference between abortion and aborted principles.

June 15 2010 at 9:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
rverao

I remember watching tv and seeing disable children and wondered why the parent didn't choose an abortion.I was thinking about the child having to suffer for the rest of their life I was wrong to think that way all life is beautiful and if the parent can take care of their child that's great and if they can't others like the public should.If this government can waste our government money on hiring employees that watch porno and earmark money goes to stupid studies we should stop wasting that money and use it on orphans and widows.

June 15 2010 at 6:41 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners